Eliot Richardson
2.9K posts

Eliot Richardson
@fitzcavendish
A Liberal for Freedom of Expression. Sex realist.












Three main reasons: the other side deny biological sex is the basis of sexual preference, and thus they deny that homosexuality is even real. Second: the maximalist lefty/centre/FF/FG position on “LGBTIQ+ rights” is so extreme that it will likely accelerate the conditions that will lead to even more anti-everything backlash. The more you mix “gay rights” up into troony shit (all normal people hate the troony shit and you know it) the worse it is for even the most basic rights of homosexuals. Third: gaybashing is done by immigrant cultures that don’t just hate gay people but see them as an affront to God. Whoever lets in fewer, the better for gays. Very few people who voted for gay marriage had any plan to get gay married. Even gay people. It was a symbol of acceptance. The marriage mattered less than the message. Maria Steen might have religious objections to gay marriage, but who bodes better for the *actual* future of gay people: a woman who has Judeo-Christian convictions? Or a bunch of freaky queer multicoloured neurodivergent open-borders Islamist-appeasing hysterics? We all know the answer.




Nepal has elected its first trans Member of Parliament. Like other Asian countries, Nepal recognises a third gender for people who do not fit neatly into male/man or female/women. The idea that gender can be fluid or non-binary is not a new or western idea. It has been around for millennia and exists in many cultures


Here’s a proposition for discussion: When the proportion of women in a sector—law, justice, politics, education—reaches a critical mass, the culture of that sector changes in ways that are functionally independent of the dispositions of the individual women.


The UK's censorship agency, Ofcom, issued 4chan with a giant fine today. We responded to Ofcom with a giant hamster today.


















