Jennifer

41.1K posts

Jennifer banner
Jennifer

Jennifer

@flufffynan

Rejoined Twitter when Elon took over. I am hopeful for free speech here now.

Katılım Ekim 2022
463 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
IMPORTANT: A new website debunking all the Trump hoaxes including how they fool people. The next time you hear someone babbling about a hoax, please direct them here! americandebunk.com
English
10
6
75
12.3K
Alex Jones
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones·
BREAKING: Trump Has Not Only Early Dementia but His Swollen Ankles Are A Sign of Congestive Heart Failure. “TRUMP is Off the Rails. I Support the Old Trump. We’ve Got a Big, Big Problem.” 🔴TUNE IN NOW NOW NOW: 👇 x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
717
336
2K
192.7K
Vince Langman
Vince Langman@LangmanVince·
Do you still trust Tulsi Gabbard?
Vince Langman tweet media
English
433
47
706
18.6K
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
@MattWalshBlog 1000%. That was one of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen.
English
0
0
0
3
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
Bondi should have been fired the day after the Epstein binder fiasco, which was one of the dumbest, most gratuitous and wholly unnecessary stunts I’ve ever seen in politics. I’m glad she’s gone now. We need someone who will actually do things. Not pretend to do things.
English
552
1K
15.4K
197.9K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
SCOOP? I’ve been telling you this for weeks. 😅 And then everyone jumped down my throat and called me crazy when I said Tulsi Gabbard @TulsiGabbard would be leaving ODNI soon. Tulsi is done. The White House wants zero drama so they gave her the option to resign, but as I told them, she will do a lot of damage if she is given the choice to resign because she will launch her 2028 Presidential campaign, spew more Israel derangement conspiracy theories like her friend @joekent16jan19 (who she is responsible for) and undermine President Trump’s foreign policy. She needs to be condemned for protecting Kent and undermining President Trump’s agenda. Tulsi Gabbard should be fired. Not given the dignity of a resignation. It’s time for the White House to stop being so gracious to people who undermine the President and leak behind his back. Enough is enough. PS: Stop taking credit for my work.
Hugo Lowell@hugolowell

SCOOP: Trump has been asking cabinet officials in recent weeks whether he should replace Tulsi Gabbard as DNI, venting frustration about her leadership and that she shielded Joe Kent, a former deputy who undercut his rationale for war with Iran @guardian theguardian.com/us-news/2026/a…

English
234
469
2K
143.3K
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
@0hour1 Notice how none of the women are working out? Because they aren’t right for these kinds of jobs and it never works…
English
0
0
0
1
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
Rumor: Pam Bondi last day as AG April 30th 2026
English
223
140
1.4K
26.1K
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
BREAKING: Pam Bondi is OUT as Attorney General according to Fox News. What's your first reaction to this? Who do you want to see replace her?
English
3.1K
670
5.5K
186.4K
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
@ImMeme0 I’m triggered because it’s so ugly
English
0
0
0
1
I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Leftists say a “maggot” will be triggered watching her carry a Balenciaga bag, wear Fendi shoes, and pay for her groceries with food stamps.
English
724
358
1.2K
50.2K
Alex Christy
Alex Christy@alexchristy17·
Stephen Colbert concluded his interview with Meryl Streep by inviting her to talk about whatever she wants and she went for the voter suppression fearmongering, "the SAVE America Act, if that passes, all the married women that have changed their names are going to have to go to the registrar and prove that they are who they are. In other words, to your voting registrar, this is what I understand. Otherwise when you get to the voting booth in November, you might be disqualified because your name on your birth certificate doesn't match your name on the voting rolls."
English
434
39
164
128.5K
Charlie’s Voice Rising
Charlie’s Voice Rising@CharlieK_news·
🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump’s attorney John Sauer just wrapped his opening argument on birthright citizenship and absolutely schooled Justice Ketanji Jackson. Jackson tried to trap him with an emotional hospital-birth scenario involving illegal migrants. JACKSON: “Are we bringing pregnant women in for depositions?!” SAUER: “No. The executive order depends on lawful status. If a baby is born, a birth certificate is issued, and the system checks immigration status through existing databases.” Jackson then pushed again, asking whether parents would get a chance to prove they intended to stay in the U.S. Sauer shut that down too. He said the exact opposite is true: if someone believes they were wrongly denied, there are ways to challenge it, but those cases would be rare. When Jackson asked if that challenge only comes after a baby is denied citizenship, Sauer made it crystal clear: The system already verifies the parents’ status automatically, using robust databases, and for the overwhelming majority of parents, the process would look no different than it does now. Do you support ending birthright citizenship for illegal aliens? A. Yes, end it B. No C. Only for legal residents D. Need SCOTUS to decide
English
4K
2.7K
10.5K
253.3K
Mistie Comerford
Mistie Comerford@MistieComerfor2·
@RightScopee If they were raised here in our school systems, yes, because they don't deserve to be punished for the crimes of their parents or whoever brought them here. If they are still babies & children, send them home as a family.
English
56
0
19
2.1K
Jennifer retweetledi
Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
Mr Reagan 🇺🇸@MrReaganUSA·
Dear Ketanji Brown Jackson, Stealing a wallet is not a legal path to citizenship in Japan. You are an embarrassment to the Supreme Court. Sincerely, America
Mr Reagan 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
294
1.5K
5.7K
38.4K
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
John Sauer: “8 Billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who is a US citizen.” Chief Justice Roberts: “It’s a new world, but it’s the same Constitution.” Robert’s is saying we have to let the country be invaded and destroyed?
English
242
967
4.4K
149.8K
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
Certainly everyone on the Supreme Court understands this so why would they be deliberately destructive?
LHGrey™️@grey4626

Birthright citizenship isn’t some sacred constitutional bedrock. It’s a fucking loophole carved into the 14th Amendment and weaponized into a slow-motion coup against American sovereignty...one that the Chinese Communist Party is already exploiting with industrial precision to seize control of our elections from within. The clause is crystal clear if you bother to read it without the globalist fog: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was never meant to hand passports to the spawn of tourists, visa-hoppers, or invaders. It was ratified in 1868 to secure citizenship for freed slaves whose parents had been domiciled here under American law for generations...people fully within our political allegiance, not foreign agents dropping anchor babies on U.S. soil and jetting back to Beijing. The framers weren’t idiots; they rejected jus soli absolutism precisely to avoid this pathology. Yet here we are, pretending temporary presence equals jurisdiction while the CCP laughs all the way to the ballot box. Enter the Chinese angle...the one polite society refuses to name because it shatters the “diversity is strength” delusion. This isn’t random migration. It’s calculated demographic infiltration, straight out of Beijing’s United Front playbook and the long-war doctrine of the 100-Year Marathon. For over a decade, CCP-linked birth tourism outfits...dozens of them, advertising luxury “confinement centers” in California and beyond...have funneled tens of thousands of pregnant Chinese nationals here annually. Conservative estimates from Senate hearings and investigative reporting put it at 50,000 Chinese births a year at peak, with some tallies reaching 80,000 pre-pandemic and claims of 750,000 to 1.5 million U.S.-citizen children now being raised in the PRC. These kids get the golden ticket at birth, then vanish back to the mainland for full-spectrum CCP indoctrination: mandatory Xi Jinping Thought, surveillance-state loyalty tests, family guanxi networks that bind them tighter than any oath to the Stars and Stripes. Psychology 101: allegiance isn’t erased by a hospital stamp. It’s forged in the womb of the regime that raised them...through social credit, party discipline, and the ancient art of leveraging blood ties. When these “Americans” hit voting age, they won’t be voting for liberty. They’ll be vectors for Beijing’s hybrid warfare, tipping congressional seats, statehouses, and presidential margins in the very districts where foreign influence already festers. Geopolitically, this is lethal. China doesn’t need to hack voting machines when it can breed voters. These anchor citizens become the perfect cutouts: dual-passport leverage points for espionage, influence ops, and demographic swamping of key swing areas. They sponsor family chains later. They run for office. They normalize the CCP’s narrative in American politics while their parents and handlers back home pull the strings. It’s not paranoia; it’s the same playbook they’ve run on academia, tech, and Hollywood...only now it’s baked into the Constitution itself. Every nation on Earth except a handful rejects this absurdity because sovereignty demands it. We alone treat our citizenship like a participation trophy for anyone who can book a flight. This isn’t sustainable. It’s suicidal. It rewards the very adversaries who view our republic as a resource to be looted, not a civilization to defend. End birthright citizenship for non-domiciled foreigners...now...or watch the CCP’s womb warriors graduate into the electorate and rewrite our future in Mandarin-inflected ballots. America’s not a hotel. It’s a fortress. Time to slam the gates before the invasion by passport becomes irreversible. 💀🗡️⚖️

English
0
0
0
2
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
@grey4626 Any normal thinking person knows this is true. Our Supreme Court isn’t stupid (well most of them) so why are they being so deliberately destructive??
English
1
0
1
35
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
Birthright citizenship isn’t some sacred constitutional bedrock. It’s a fucking loophole carved into the 14th Amendment and weaponized into a slow-motion coup against American sovereignty...one that the Chinese Communist Party is already exploiting with industrial precision to seize control of our elections from within. The clause is crystal clear if you bother to read it without the globalist fog: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was never meant to hand passports to the spawn of tourists, visa-hoppers, or invaders. It was ratified in 1868 to secure citizenship for freed slaves whose parents had been domiciled here under American law for generations...people fully within our political allegiance, not foreign agents dropping anchor babies on U.S. soil and jetting back to Beijing. The framers weren’t idiots; they rejected jus soli absolutism precisely to avoid this pathology. Yet here we are, pretending temporary presence equals jurisdiction while the CCP laughs all the way to the ballot box. Enter the Chinese angle...the one polite society refuses to name because it shatters the “diversity is strength” delusion. This isn’t random migration. It’s calculated demographic infiltration, straight out of Beijing’s United Front playbook and the long-war doctrine of the 100-Year Marathon. For over a decade, CCP-linked birth tourism outfits...dozens of them, advertising luxury “confinement centers” in California and beyond...have funneled tens of thousands of pregnant Chinese nationals here annually. Conservative estimates from Senate hearings and investigative reporting put it at 50,000 Chinese births a year at peak, with some tallies reaching 80,000 pre-pandemic and claims of 750,000 to 1.5 million U.S.-citizen children now being raised in the PRC. These kids get the golden ticket at birth, then vanish back to the mainland for full-spectrum CCP indoctrination: mandatory Xi Jinping Thought, surveillance-state loyalty tests, family guanxi networks that bind them tighter than any oath to the Stars and Stripes. Psychology 101: allegiance isn’t erased by a hospital stamp. It’s forged in the womb of the regime that raised them...through social credit, party discipline, and the ancient art of leveraging blood ties. When these “Americans” hit voting age, they won’t be voting for liberty. They’ll be vectors for Beijing’s hybrid warfare, tipping congressional seats, statehouses, and presidential margins in the very districts where foreign influence already festers. Geopolitically, this is lethal. China doesn’t need to hack voting machines when it can breed voters. These anchor citizens become the perfect cutouts: dual-passport leverage points for espionage, influence ops, and demographic swamping of key swing areas. They sponsor family chains later. They run for office. They normalize the CCP’s narrative in American politics while their parents and handlers back home pull the strings. It’s not paranoia; it’s the same playbook they’ve run on academia, tech, and Hollywood...only now it’s baked into the Constitution itself. Every nation on Earth except a handful rejects this absurdity because sovereignty demands it. We alone treat our citizenship like a participation trophy for anyone who can book a flight. This isn’t sustainable. It’s suicidal. It rewards the very adversaries who view our republic as a resource to be looted, not a civilization to defend. End birthright citizenship for non-domiciled foreigners...now...or watch the CCP’s womb warriors graduate into the electorate and rewrite our future in Mandarin-inflected ballots. America’s not a hotel. It’s a fortress. Time to slam the gates before the invasion by passport becomes irreversible. 💀🗡️⚖️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
70
650
1.5K
12.6K
Jennifer
Jennifer@flufffynan·
@JasmineForUS So we’re not alllowed to point out that she’s stupid just because she’s black?
English
0
1
1
19
Jasmine Crockett
Jasmine Crockett@JasmineForUS·
The meltdown over Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is truly something EVERYONE needs to pay attention to. You see, as the first & only black woman to ever serve on the court, she had to be 10 times better than most… She continues to flex her brilliance in oral arguments & many dissents. Please note that by the time a black woman ascends to a powerful position, she Definitely Earned It… if you have any questions… let’s talk about Senator, now Secretary Mullin… or please pull the resumes of some of the other justices before entering this chat… actually just don’t, it’s not a debate, these are FACTS (alternative facts = LIES).
English
15.2K
5.5K
32.8K
1.6M
Brandon Gill
Brandon Gill@realBrandonGill·
Something tells me that when Senator Jacob Howard wrote 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' in the 14th amendment, his intention wasn't that pregnant Guatemalans could cross into Texas, give birth, and have a child with the same rights as you and I.
English
400
2.1K
10.2K
120.5K
Jennifer retweetledi
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
Sauer drew a clear line with Justice Barrett. Today's illegal entrants cross by choice in open defiance of U.S. law. Their presence is not rendered lawful by mere arrival. Under the original public meaning, citizenship flows only to children of parents who are lawfully present with intent to remain. The 14th Amendment was never meant to reward lawbreaking or erase Congress's power over immigration. It affirmed sovereignty, not surrender.
English
141
4.4K
18.6K
266.6K