flyfishingdadbod

Canadians watching their timber market go up in smoke. It does hurt us as we do buy 90% of it. Anyway F Canada!

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF

@flyfishingdadbo @TheSCIF There you go again with the party script - dismissing me with name calling and demeaning comments. But I commend you on not using names that are as cutting and derogatory as you did previously. That’s progress🌿d

President Trump started with a massive 800,000 vote lead in PA during the 2020 election. Then was ahead by over 600,000 votes with over 80% of the votes counted. Somebody gave the order to stop counting, not just in PA, but around the country. Mathematically impossible votes are dumped all throughout the night around the country for Biden, who then miraculously wins in every state Trump was leading in, including PA. Rudy and multiple election experts find over 600,000 fraudulent votes in PA alone, not including multiple other forms of fraud, not just in PA, but in every single state Biden cleared the margin of "victory" in.

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Try thinking for yourself. It’s evident you are a heavy AI user. Have a good day Mr AI

I had certainly heard of the settlement, but didn’t know very much about the details. I’ve reviewed it with my AI and I have a better understanding of it right now. It seems like one of the issues in the case is that there were rulings that the judge made earlier in the case which found that certain claims that Fox personalities had made against Dominion were false - and these findings were going to be given to the jury as directives. I understand your position and arguing that the settlement paid by fox is good proof that there was no fraud by dominion machines. The settlement certainly lends supports to your position on this topic, but it actually does not provide a definitive determination of whether the voting machines had any improper calculations or manipulation. I asked my AI for actual court cases where a person has been found guilty or pled guilty to voting fraud and/or irregularities regarding the 2020 election and their or a good number of such cases. I would be happy to provide those to you if you would like, but you can do your own search. Information is still being gathered, and there are a number of cases where election information on the 2020 election is being requested from states. DHS draft report (leaked July 16, 2026): Claims to have found noncitizens registered to vote in four states — California (190,832), New Jersey (35,152), Nevada (15,903), and Pennsylvania (14,576). Politico reports the data source is unclear, that DOJ has been suing states for voter files with all 15 judges ruling against those requests as overly broad, The issue and point I am making is the right to ask questions and gather the information necessary to properly evaluate allegations of voter fraud in voter irregularity should be encouraged and not summarily dismissed based upon procedural motions, like almost all of the cases brought soon after the election were dismissed. I’m also trying to make the point that those who try to pursue legitimate questions and determine whether or not these countries identified in the vulnerabilities report acted on these vulnerabilities or if there was other type of voting fraud or irregularity, we should encourage and welcome such inquiries because in dealing with those it actually improves the system and improves the integrity of the system, and people’s trust in confidence in the system. These inquiries should be encouraged and not subject to name-calling and demeaning comments. But I also recognize that people complaining about the system as Being unreliable is a danger that can also cause people to not have confidence in the system. It is very much like a referee making a call and then having all the different camera angles, which can help prove whether the referee’s call was correct or not. Without all of the camera angles being reviewed, which can show more clearly what happened, referees would probably not be held in very high esteem and neither would the integrity of the game. If we have the camera angles that can help us figure out the facts, but we keep the public from being able to see those and keep the other team from being able to see those then that does not promote integrity in the system. But in challenging the call of the referee , there are repercussions for repeatedly making idol protest. 🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Have you seen the lawsuit where Fox paid Dominion $780 million in defamation for false accusations of voter fraud? I beleive facts, not conspiracy theories.

This document does not show evidence of actual fraud, it was by its own terms, designed to show vulnerability in the US voting system, and also it identified several countries that had the ability to engage in activity, which would directly affect the US voting system. And this is only part of where voting errors can occur. Have you ever watched the film 2000 mules which details other types of voting fraud, and errors? Have you not been following the plethora of voting irregularity and voter fraud cases from various states that have taken place since 2020. I could give you screenshots of articles and posts which show voter fraud and voting a regularities, but you will not likely believe any of them, and even if you did believe them, then you will likely say that things like that happen, but it did not change the outcome of the election. So, going through that process would not likely produce anything helpful as far as a discussion between you and me. Gathering information about vulnerabilities in the system, and then trying to track down whether any of those things came to pass and trying to create safeguards to deal with these issues. It certainly something that we all should be able to agree on. But again, just name-calling and ridiculing people that ask questions and want to get accurate information is not helpful in getting our voting system to where it needs to be🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Thank you for your admission that there is no evidence of fraud occurring. I accept your concession. Have a good day.

Thank you for your question. The document is dated January 15, 2020, so we can conclude that the document was prepared based on information available on or before that date. From reading the document, it appears that it was written as an assessment of vulnerability before the actual election. It does not say or conclude the fraud actually occurred, but does identify discovered vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities have been further researched since the election, and since this document was dated, and it is certainly reasonable to try and assess if these vulnerabilities were acted upon. I know you’re really smart, but you don’t know what happened and neither do I. Why would you oppose someone like me having the ability to assess whether or not these discovered vulnerabilities were acted upon. And these are not the only areas of concern regarding the votes cast and the votes tabulated for the 2020 election. There has been lots of information, uncovered since the election showing errors and fraud and potential for errors and fraud in the 2020 votes cast and vote totals. Do I know who to believe or what to believe as far as the election results or the security of future elections? I do not. But I do know that we should not artificially keep people from asking questions and making sure that we have accurate information and that we know who is legitimately authorized to vote and who actually voted, and that the votes were counted accurately. This is the very reason there are laws which require ballots and voting system information to be retained unaltered for long period of time following the election. Not welcoming questions and denying the opportunity to prove the accuracy of election does not promote election integrity, but promotes suspicion of impropriety. When someone has a question and other people, like you, my friend, jump on them and demean them, and start calling them names for merely asking a question, you are not improving the integrity of the process. You are causing folks like me to question it even more. And what this approach does is to make people like you and me suspicious of and mistrusting most everything.🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Show me the evidence of fraud. “Potential fraud” is not fraud…

@flyfishingdadbo @TheSCIF And exactly as predicted, you respond. Here’s your script @flyfishingdadbo - refuse to engage in civil debate, name call and demean the other person and feel securely superior.✌️🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Can you please show me where it states what fraud actually occurred????

Let me help you @flyfishingdadbo - here is just one of the unclassified docs referenced in last night’s presidential address - which I feel certain you will not read and/or which you will undoubtedly dismiss - because you know in that wonderfully protected mind of yours that the doc is so obviously irrelevant to the 2020 election or is just BS, that you will simply refuse to read it or allow it to contaminate your thinking. If you dare read it, I will be happy to engage you in a civil discussion about its contents✌️🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Haha, that trove of tripe? Even Fox News said his claims were unverified. There is zero evidence of any votes being cast illegillaly or votes being changed. Trump could say the moon is made of cheese and idiots like you would beleive him. Grow a brain.

You really might want to actually try the “civil discussion” thing sometime instead of just staying with the party line approach of name calling and demeaning others. Oh, and on the 2020 election, in case you want to be well versed and better prepared for “civil discussion” in the future, you may want to check out the newly unclassified documents referenced in Trump’s address to the nation last night🤔🤔🤔✌️🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF There is no point having a “civil discussion” with anyone who still believes the 2020 election was stolen.

There’s the familiar party line again - When you are afraid and unwilling to have a civil discussion using facts, respectful arguments and policy positions, you name call, ridicule and demean others. If that’s all you’ve got and you can’t break the habit, then you may want to quit this interchange because you no one wants to make you dumber✌️🌿d

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF You want to deal with facts yet you lap up Trump’s unfounded claims. Bitch please, I’m getting dumber just engaging with you.

And there you go again. Going right back to your learned talking points. When you are unable to deal with facts and civil debate and an appropriate give-and-take a facts, argument and mutual respect; then you just ridicule your opponent and call them a “gullible idiot.” As far as helping you, you appear to have misunderstood what I said or intentionally misrepresented it. I was offering arguments and observations on which I thought we both could reach some sort of agreement and that’s what I said: That I was trying to help you and me reach some sort of reasonable agreement. You seem to be someone interested in the welfare of systems but I find your go to talking points to undermine your ability to intellectually convince anyone to the efficacy of your position. At most, your style would seem to show them that you are skilled at name-calling and ridicule and making demeaning caricatures of others. And that may be enough to silence them, but I doubt you will convince them with these abusive tactics. So, on the topic I was trying to see if we could get agreement, I was offering those points to help you and me to see if we could have some sort of reasonable agreement or reasonable recognition of the position of each other. We’ll see what your second swing at this pitch looks like✌️🌿d

@TerryTheDude73 It’s public record….

The Chinese hacked 220 million voter files. I want you to defend that I dare somebody to defend that.

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Help me???? 😂😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡 You’re a Gullible idiot.

I’m still here. Do you think you can get rid of me just by ridiculing me. You are sadly mistaken, my friend. I’m trying to help you see what I see. I may not be right, but I will stay in here and get to the bottom of it between you and me. If you are ready to cut and run, then go ahead and do it. I’m here for the Long Hall. I’m here to help you and me come to some sort of reasonable agreement. So are you in or are you cutting and running? I’m still here.

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF

Exactly! You are acknowledging This is the way you feel about Trump, although he represents the government of the United States of America. But I don’t expect you to trust him because he is in that position. You have lost confidence in him. You don’t think the system around him would catch his lying and cheating and malfeasance. So you don’t trust him and you don’t trust the system around him. But, you expect me and people like me to trust the election system like you trust it. And not only do you expect us to do it but when we don’t, you ridicule us. Don’t you see the problem you are creating? you say the government has answered the question of voter integrity, and that is the end of it and you expect me to just buy what you were selling. I don’t ask you to buy what Trump is selling. You get the ability to question it, and we can discuss the facts of it. But when I question voter fraud, you just ridicule me and tell me I am stupid. I encourage you to question me and we can discuss the facts and hopefully we can arrive at a positive conclusion. But when you ridicule me and dismiss me without engaging the facts, then you become the problem.

🚨JUST IN: More than 100 House Democrats vote to cut off aid to Israel.

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Seriously??? Why don’t I trust Trump???? He is a liar and a conman. The better question is, why do you beleive him??

Maybe you are unaware that until so many changes in election laws which occurred during Covid, in person voting, whether early voting or on election day, was the norm; and the absentee ballot process was fairly secure and it allowed those in the military and disabled, etc. to responsibly and timely cast votes. When Jimmy Carter, after he left presidency, begin working with voter integrity in countries that had voting systems that were filled with fraud in era, one of the things he did was require in person voting, and when the person voted, they had indelible ink put on their hand so that they would only be able to vote once. Cheating in casting and counting votes is not not a new problem. To take the position that the problem that and many others are raising concerns is a made up problem is itself a denial of history, and also a denial of human nature. Let me ask you, since you seem to be taking the position that people in positions of authority, do not lie and cheat, and would not lie and cheat in elections, the why don’t you just trust whatever President Trump does? After all, he is the sitting president and you trust government so implicitly. Why will you not trust him? There are systems in place to prevent him from lying and cheating and whatever other bad thing you think he may be doing and you trust the systems to take care of those things so what’s the problem with you trusting him? Because you don’t trust him. You have lost confidence in him. You don’t think the system around him would catch his lying and cheating and malfeasance. So you don’t trust him and you don’t trust the system around him. But, you expect me and people like me to trust the election system like you trust it. And not only do you expect us to do it but when we don’t, you ridicule us. The difference though is that I would defend your right to question and ask for proof and to question the decisions of the president or any other government official. But that’s not what I receive from you. I receive ridicule and condemnation and avoidance of the opportunity to have a full and fair challenge the of the accuracy of what I’m being told by a government system that I do not trust. I’m interested in how critical, and self-critical, your thought process actually is.

@DaledoveDove @TheSCIF Cheating doesn’t exist to the point where disenfranchising a huge portion of the electorate is justified which is why lawsuit after lawsuit have been thrown out of court.

You know better. All you’re doing is parroting the prescribe talking points. What you were doing and what you were saying, these are the very things that are diminishing trust in the electoral system. This is not anything hard and all this stuff that the Democrats are pushing just create mistrust and uncertainty for all sorts of reasons. If you want to increase trust in the process, then require in-person voting, with a valid government issued id; limit mail in voting to only provable inability to get to the polls. If you argue that some people will be disenfranchised, then that is a small price to pay for disenfranchising The entire electorate. That’s what you and your arguments are doing. You were promoting the disenfranchisement of the entire electric in the integrity of the system. This is not hard but your talking points are making it seem that way. I hope you will join me in promoting things that make cheating hard and provide clear verification for the person casting the vote and also 100% transparency on those people counting the votes.

@s_mossawi There are clearly England players behind the blue line….

🚨🚨 حالة التسلل التي اتى منها الهدف الأول لمنتخب الأرجنتين ؛ المعلق الانجليزي كان يصرخ انها تسلل والمخرج لم يقوم بالاعادة والـ VAR لم يراجع اللقطة . #ENGLAND #ARGENTINA #كاس_العالم_٢٠٢٦

HOLY CRAP. President Trump is preparing to disclose that there are over 100,000 non-citizens or illegal aliens ON THE VOTER ROLLS — Paul Sperry

@piersmorgan “Should have won”????? By what measure? Pipe down morgan. England fails on the world stage time after time. You’re a pathetic lot.

As for England’s players, they gave us some fantastic moments, especially the 10-man heroics in Mexico. Let’s not forget that amid all the bitter acrimony of losing a game we should have won. The next big tournament is the Euros on UK soil. I back Tuchel to bring it home then.