Sergio 🇪🇸

2.7K posts

Sergio 🇪🇸

Sergio 🇪🇸

@flying_sergio

Katılım Eylül 2020
294 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin Hehe good one. What I meant is that dozens of dead soldiers lying in a field it's a pretty strong picture, specially when used as wartime propaganda. But it's not indicative of the overall ratio of losses or course of the war in any remote way. Cheers.
English
1
0
1
40
Clément Molin
Clément Molin@clement_molin·
I put on a map a video showing 60 russian 🇷🇺 bodies on a 700 meter road along the Kazanny Torets river near the village of Boikivka. This road is only 1 500 meters from the infamous Novotoretske village with the hundreds dead russian soldiers. 🧵1/7 ⬇️
Clément Molin tweet media
English
53
665
3.5K
240K
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin That's massive the same way that losses on the Ukranian side are, despite you not seeing 15 dead bodies and trying to extrapolate that that means a 0:15 death ratio. It's a full scale war, with terrible losses on both sides.
English
1
0
1
50
Stevie Q
Stevie Q@stevenQ78611072·
@flying_sergio @clement_molin If your average failed assault (which there are many) involves dozens of dead, which means thousands dead a month as you admit, how is that not massive...? Or have we become desensitized by Russian losses?
English
2
0
7
157
Vzab
Vzab@vic_zab89·
@flying_sergio @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin Around 20km is the average along the front. Some parts haven’t moved and others moved more. As you said, Russia has 3-4x the amount of people and more money - by offering years of income as a sign up bonus, they find lots of volunteers, especially in poorer regions.
English
1
0
9
76
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin Yes, in a war that sadly kills thousands of soldiers a month, seing dozens (10-50) of bodies after a failed assault and calling that "massive" is more about wartime propaganda than reality.
English
2
0
3
144
Stevie Q
Stevie Q@stevenQ78611072·
@flying_sergio @clement_molin You have a hard time figuring out why seeing dozens of verified dead Russians on a single dirt road is considered massive losses?
English
1
0
11
136
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@vic_zab89 @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin Again I'm, not pretending to change your mind here. Believe whatever you want, who cares. But your point of view is very far from the reality, the same way that someone that thinks Russia is having a field day with almost no losses is.
English
0
0
1
51
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@vic_zab89 @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin I'ts very tiresome arguing with false claims (20km in 3 years?) The same logic can be applied to you. Russia is a 150m country, about 3* the people of Ukr. If Ukraine inflicts 3*, or even 2* the deaths that Russia does, how is Russia not forcibly mobilizing yet as Ukraine does?
English
2
0
1
195
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin I've never understood how can anyone come into terms with 20-30 Russian bodies in a failed assault are "massive losses", but dozens of 3000kg guided bombs don't. You can assume not every impact makes a loss, but I think the main reason is that you don't see the aftermath.
English
2
1
3
167
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin Ukraine is fighting a different war than Russia, that's why you see different things. We have daily videos of guided bombs (hundreds a day) impacting on Ukr positions. That makes a different but also lethal picture.
English
2
0
2
157
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@vic_zab89 @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin You can believe whatever you want, that's your own choice, reality doesn't care about opinions (not to say my opinion is the right one BTW). What you say makes sense, but also makes sense that (I.E)the side dropping hundreds of guided bombs a day can inflict more damage.
English
1
0
1
171
Vzab
Vzab@vic_zab89·
@flying_sergio @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin It is a full scale war but attacker always is at a disadvantage, especially in the age of drones. I don’t believe that Russian losses are 1M+ but I do believe they have been higher than Ukraine.
English
1
0
12
200
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@stevenQ78611072 @clement_molin I will try to summarize: you probably have a bit of an eco chamber in your information space that leads you to believe this claims. I think you are not really interested in analysing the reality of this war, so keep believing whatever you want.
English
4
0
2
364
Stevie Q
Stevie Q@stevenQ78611072·
@flying_sergio @clement_molin How does it never work when its just of of many pieces of evidence that Russia suffers more casualties....? We've never seen massive amounts of Ukrainian dead strewn about from failed assaults, its always Russians.
English
3
0
13
418
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@vic_zab89 @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin The fact is that's is a large scale war with terrible numbers on both sides. Believe whatever you want, but counting bodies on the ground that one side feeds in no indication of death ratio.
English
2
0
1
212
Vzab
Vzab@vic_zab89·
@flying_sergio @ShaunGahan64072 @clement_molin They are but fact is Russia has been recruiting lots of people and is barely moving the front. These soldiers don’t disappear- they die. Question is how many but Mediazona has over 200k confirmed and the time lag is significant for reporting.
English
2
0
29
252
Aidan
Aidan@aidannonx·
Can we stop doing the “we know how Iraq and Afghanistan went?” Iraq we lost 4k and 40k wounded, compared to 50k dead, Afghanistan we had 3.5k dead 23k wounded, they lost 50k at least The majority of deaths came from allied Iraqis and Afghanis We didn’t “lose” we lost the will
SOVEREIGN BRAH 🇺🇸🏛️⚡️@sovereignbrah

Iran is calling our bluff because they know a ground invasion would be catastrophic for US forces. Doing targeted strikes with Delta or DEVGRU is one thing –– doing a full scale democracy-building invasion is the dumbest possible thing we could do. They have an overwhelming strategic advantage. We have an incredible military. Best in the world by far, no one else comes close. Still doesn't matter here. Iran is massive, and built like a fortress. It has 90 million people, tons of hidden bases and outposts, infinite places to ambush US troops, and more than 600,000 fighters who are ideologically motivated to fight to the death and kill as many US troops as possible. Their landmass is 50% larger than both Iraq and Afghanistan combined. They have 5x more troops than we faced in Iraq and Afghanistan combined –– and everyone knows how those went. These aren't a bunch of goat herders with RPGs, either –– they have a sophisticated military, they're better-equipped than anyone else we've faced in decades, and they've also prepared for this conflict for decades. Further, their fighters believe they're on a holy and righteous mission. We martyred their religious leader and humiliated their country on the world stage –– and the Persians are a very proud people. These people would gladly fight to the death for decades on end in a brutal war of attrition, honored at the opportunity to kill as many Americans as possible and eventually be martyred at the hand of the Great Satan. Analysts estimate it would take 500,000-1M troops to secure Iran in a full-scale ground invasion. It would require decades, many trillions of dollars, and be orders of magnitude more challenging than conquering Iraq and Afghanistan combined. It's hard to estimate how many American troops would die. Not gonna happen. Ridiculous to even consider a full-scale ground invasion. This stuff about the admin potentially drafting Americans for an invasion –– it's nonsense. They're bluffing to get Tehran to come to the table, and Tehran knows it. That said –– if we ever were crazy enough to attempt a full-scale invasion, the Iranians would welcome it. Their country would become a graveyard for American soldiers, and the expenditures would bankrupt our country. We can't afford to make that mistake.

English
74
6
110
21.1K
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@PedroInsua1 @habladorXXI "Podríamos usarlas si quisiéramos. Podríamos simplemente volar y usarlas. Nadie nos va a decir que no". Esto no es una amenaza territorial? x.com/negocios_tv/st…
Negocios TV@negocios_tv

🚨 TRUMP ROMPE CON ESPAÑA: "HE ORDENADO CORTAR TODA RELACIÓN, USAREMOS LAS BASES SI QUEREMOS" 🇺🇸❌🇪🇸 En una de las declaraciones más hostiles hacia un aliado de la OTAN en la historia reciente, el presidente Donald Trump ha dinamitado este 3 de marzo la relación con el gobierno de España. La negativa de Madrid a permitir el uso de sus bases para la ofensiva contra Irán ha desatado la furia de la Casa Blanca. 🏛️📈 Los puntos clave de este choque diplomático: 🚫 RUPTURA TOTAL: Trump no se guardó nada al calificar la postura española: "España ha sido terrible. Le dije a Scott [su asesor de Seguridad Nacional] que cortara toda relación con España". Esto implica la suspensión de cooperación en inteligencia, defensa y comercio. 📉🧱 ✈️ DESAFÍO A LA SOBERANÍA: Ante la prohibición de usar las bases de Rota y Morón, el mandatario lanzó un desafío directo: "Podríamos usarlas si quisiéramos. Podríamos simplemente volar y usarlas. Nadie nos va a decir que no". Una frase que pone en entredicho la soberanía territorial española. 🦅🛡️ ⚔️ "POR LA FUERZA": Trump sugiere que la importancia estratégica de las bases en suelo español para la operación contra Irán prevalece sobre los tratados internacionales: "Nadie nos va a decir que no las usemos". 🎖️⚠️ 🌊 CONSECUENCIAS PARA LA OTAN: Esta ruptura marca un precedente peligroso dentro de la Alianza Atlántica, posicionando a España como un "paria" a ojos de la actual administración estadounidense mientras dure el conflicto. 🌍⚖️ La situación es de máxima alerta en el Palacio de la Moncloa: "Para Trump, España ha pasado de aliado a obstáculo; su amenaza de ignorar las prohibiciones y 'simplemente volar' sobre las bases pone a la diplomacia europea en el momento más crítico desde la Guerra Fría". 🎯⚖️ ¿Crees que el gobierno de España debería ceder ante la presión de Trump para evitar sanciones económicas, o es el momento de que la Unión Europea se plante ante lo que muchos consideran una violación de la soberanía nacional? ¿Qué opinas? 👇💬

Español
0
0
0
25
Pedro Insua
Pedro Insua@PedroInsua1·
@habladorXXI ¿Amenazas a nuestro territorio? ¿Dónde?, ¿cuándo?...¿quién? Menudo hombre de paja se fabrica usted, caballero. Trump ha hablado de cortar relaciones comerciales, cosa bastante normal si un, se supone aliado, te da la espalda.
Español
5
0
2
105
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@PedroInsua1 @habladorXXI Ser "aliado" y "no dar la espalda" no significa ejecutar cualquier orden, deseo, o ambición que otro país "aliado" nos exige. Debería EEUU detener los ataques si se lo exigimos? Al fin y al cabo, el impacto económico sobre España será alto y son nuestros "aliados", verdad?
Español
0
0
0
21
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@sovieperiodico Ojalá la puedan ayudar a encontrar al perro. Pero cada vez que sale una tragedia que involucra un perro me dan náuseas de ver decenas de comentarios comparando la vida de un animal con la de una persona, y muchas veces de niños. Es un shock de realidad terrible.
Español
4
1
91
13.2K
Laura
Laura@sovieperiodico·
La hermana está en estado crítico por proteger al perro y ni aún así sois capaces de entender lo importante que es para esa familia. Por algún motivo que no comprendo os molesta que se esté ayudando a una familia que ha sufrido un accidente.
Español
54
1.8K
15.4K
593.5K
EL ESPAÑOL
EL ESPAÑOL@elespanolcom·
#Opinión | Admitamos, de una vez por todas, que la guerra de Ucrania es nuestra guerra y que son nuestras seguridades nacionales ✍️ Bernard-Henri Lévy 📲 Lee la #opinión completa aquí: dozz.es/p3z09
EL ESPAÑOL tweet media
Español
1
3
4
2.3K
Sergio 🇪🇸
Sergio 🇪🇸@flying_sergio·
@CdmxCiudad Un buen mecanico es el que se tira 15 horas para arreglar un coche, pero el que lo arregla en 8 y se va a su casa para ver a sus hijos debe ser un vago incompetente y probablemente rojo (¿sino a quien se le ocurre no echar horas extras por el mismo dinero?).
Español
1
0
2
25