SwissBird 🇨🇭

4K posts

SwissBird 🇨🇭 banner
SwissBird 🇨🇭

SwissBird 🇨🇭

@forestbirdp

Crypto Warrior and $BUM team member since the start

Katılım Ağustos 2021
183 Takip Edilen221 Takipçiler
M-log1
M-log1@log1_053·
Our friend @astronomer_zero going on a full rand of almost 200 messages in 1.5 day, to end with. "Part what you pay for, I just showed you my 6M dollar PLN flex with people in my inbox licking my ass, but I don't need the money, but I do it all for you guys, but you need to pay though". Spamming up to hide the multiple losses made past week(s) and all the wrong targets "claimed". Fucking larps they all are in their own way.
M-log1 tweet media
English
14
1
47
12.3K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
And it's done. The Astro Order Flow & Institutional Framework has been created. My complete institutional trading framework, fully decoded. "How to identify liquidity, understand positioning, execute with precision, and navigate markets with clarity and intent." And with that, I have completed the Astro Order Flow & Institutional Framework. This is a full institutional-style inspired trading framework built around market structure, price action, liquidity, order flow, execution, positioning, and risk management. For the first time, I have taken the exact concepts, techniques, and execution processes I personally rely on and structured them into a complete educational framework that can be learned, understood, and applied independently over time. You know by now one of my biggest frustrations with this industry. People posting hindsight charts, people posting fancy indicators, people posting vague predictions, people posting old tweets after the move already happened. And when everything is over, somehow the explanation always becomes "you should have known." I have always believed the trading industry should move in the opposite direction. More clarity, more transparency, more structure, more accountability and more live sharing and execution. It's what I've been trying to push since the day I arrived on this platform, and have not slowed since, as many of you know me for. And it's that philosophy what has exactly led to the creation of this framework. Because while many traders can show a trade, very few can properly explain the step-by-step live execution process behind it. The positioning, the liquidity, the execution, the invalidation, the reason the trade exists in the first place. Since my first day on X, many of you have seen the entries, the longs, the shorts, the targets, the liquidity pools, the executions, all in live time. But rarely the complete structure sitting underneath them. Simply because there is no time to explain, or make you comprehend fully. This framework changes that. It takes concepts that are often fragmented across dozens of different sources and combines them into one coherent actionable program that can actually be applied in real market conditions. Not just theory, not just isolated tools, a complete framework designed to take the complexity out of markets and replace it with structure, clarity, and repeatable execution. This took a long time to put together because teaching execution properly is significantly harder than teaching price action or indicators, especially when trying to make it accessible to traders of all skill levels. Learning these concepts early on can save years of confusion and bad habits later. Indicators and price action are easy. Execution is not. Anyone can draw a line or box on a chart. Very few people can consistently explain why a position exists, how it emerged, how it should be managed, where it should be targeted, where it becomes invalid (without being hunted), and how to navigate it when conditions change. Very few people can consistently explain why a position exists, how it emerged, how it should be managed, how it should be targeted, where it becomes invalid (without being hunted), and how to navigate it when conditions change. That is where most traders struggle, and that is exactly what this framework focuses on, with the goal to teach how order flow, liquidity, market structure, execution, and risk management combine into one complete process. So here you go, it is being delivered. The Astro Order Flow & Institutional Framework has been created. A sincere thank you goes to the mentors, traders, and researchers whose work contributed directly or indirectly to the concepts that helped shape my own understanding over the years, and I thank some of their permission to share some directly adopted tricks of the trade. Many of those influences are represented throughout the framework, combined with my own research, observations, execution models, and practical experience. Framework highlights: ✅ Institutional market structure ✅ TPO and auction market theory ✅ Liquidity pool identification and targeting ✅ Order flow fundamentals ✅ Advanced order flow execution ✅ Footprints, DOM and tape reading ✅ Institutional invalidation techniques ✅ Proprietary execution signatures ✅ Complete swing trading framework ✅ Complete scalping framework ✅ Practical real-world execution examples ✅ Designed for complete trading independence As always, this is not financial advice. It is simply a window into the framework that, with humble honesty, fundamentally changed the way I personally approach markets, making trading feel significantly more structured, more routine, and considerably less stressful, whilst still retaining the thrill that makes the profession enjoyable in the first place.
Astronomer tweet mediaAstronomer tweet mediaAstronomer tweet mediaAstronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

Introducing the Astro Order Flow & Institutional Framework This is the culmination of years spent reading markets the way institutions do: uncovering liquidity, understanding order flow, and executing with precision. Now, for the first time, I’m working on offering the exact framework I’ve refined over the years to filter noise, identify positioning, and navigate markets with clarity. You voted for it, and I listened. After years of keeping this side of my process fully private, I’ve spent recent months carefully structuring and refining the clearest way to finally share it properly. I’m getting ready to reveal how I identify institutional positioning, order flow imbalances, and high precision execution, whilst integrating it into a complete trading framework designed to function as a standalone system in itself. Eliminating intuition, eliminating guesswork. Just structured logic, repeatable execution, and a deeper understanding of how markets actually move. Over time, after beginning the process of opening up more of my trading systems publicly, many of you started asking for the next layer: the detailed structure behind the calls, the logic behind the positioning, and the framework I personally rely on. So there you go, still undergoing preparation as effectively as me (and my team) can handle, but it should be ready the coming week. This is indeed my complete institutional framework at hand: a system designed to remove noise, reduce emotional decision making, and focus on how major market participants actually position and execute. Some further teases of what is coming: ✔️ 3 institutional-level execution frameworks ✔️ Order flow methodology built around real liquidity shifts and liquidity pool targeting ✔️ My infamous order flow signatures ✔️ My institutional invalidation strategy in full detail, keeping you hidden from SL hunts ✔️ Step-by-step logic designed to remove discretionary confusion of entering and exiting position ✔️ Practical executions that appear regularly and teach you to think structurally ✔️ Designed to give you full independence, no blind following, not even of me If you’ve followed my market navigation over the years, then you already know the track record. Now, I’m offering the framework behind it. To be candid, releasing this wasn’t easy either. As a matter of fact, it still isn’t fully released yet, and there are still final confirmations and mentor permissions I need to work through properly behind the scenes. But once I began the process of opening up the systems I’ve built over the years, this naturally became part of that culmination. And equally important, the systems I have built to protect the framework itself whilst still allowing me to share it properly with you, are now battle tested and give me the confidence to finally move forward with this release whilst keeping the edge itself protected. I’m proud of what has been built, and even more motivated to help serious traders break through the noise properly. If all goes well, further details will follow as I continue refining the final execution and structure behind the framework. As always, this is not financial advice, just a window into the framework that heavily refined, or with (humble) honesty: frankly changed, the way I personally trade.

English
69
28
427
113.6K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc Like clockwork, lows taken out. As per last post, longed again low here, to sell it higher again. Alright, clean hunt of the low with our setup which turned rather crowded, now cleared and good for a better run up as I mentioned not 1 hour ago. With some key signatures triggering once again, looking for a reclaim local range, followed by a solid push up as we are now inside more sensitive areas of our high timeframe long zone, also reaching the bottom of the point I drew out to be my estimated ideal level to long and forming local three drives. Reminding you that I am done entering fresh shorts, I am looking for long setup only, as they trigger again and again here with lots of shorts being triggered below the low as if this is the breakdown of the year. Those local shorts and sentiment should be good for another solid push up, showing the authority of the sensitivity of my zone. TPO also forming a stronger low. Not quite exactly tapping into the perfect level yet, but all the long-term followers who know my zones, know that they can react early as my high timeframe zones are sensitive. And if our reaction plays out, we can adjust our stop regardless to a level below our highly favoured level. A plan is a plan, a long is a long. And I followed my plan, my long and my promise. Very close to the second local lower low (into the three drives), and with local early insititutional confirmation, we must act.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc After the TP at 73.7k, quite neutral on this long now as we didn't claim the pool yet. I'd personally prefer a long from lower after taking out the low, pushing us deeper into our key zone, over running the second and third TP's on this long on what has turned into quite a crowded long now based on some key order flow checks, leading us only to our first pinpointed TP level. Neutral, but ready for a higher conviction core long setup from our mapped out zone, as price heads deeper closer the higher timeframe zones below.

English
36
12
195
39.8K
SwissBird 🇨🇭
SwissBird 🇨🇭@forestbirdp·
@astronomer_zero This time I am in the poor category no. 2, I almost read the signs properly, but didn't executed, pity, now simply try to avoid fomo
English
1
0
0
53
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc longs - and a full step-by-step guide An educational-execution based hybrid post. Low timeframe execution of our long idea: this is a good spot to perform your first trim. Yesterday, at the time of the post, where price was at $73093, we have again received "the guaranteed reaction" from that zone, I have been talking about each and every time in recent past. One that is clear to spot if you know what to look for. Before I go further, I am very pleased with the comments of last post overall. Many commenting how they took a first attempt at the 72.7k-73k response zone, the exact time I posted this long plan. You immediately took my plan seriously. And whether that is your aggressive mindset, simply because you blindly trust me and my plans since they have been accurate and usually are accurate in general, and my zones very often show a response, just like this, or you instantly knew what to look for. All I say is: well done. Taking the long is also what I did, with some (I believed to be) too obvious hints. I quote myself from last tweet: "And, in reality, this plan is clearly detailed enough to simply long here already in theory: enter here, stoploss below... ...so let's use it as a baseline framework and take the trade that way." There were also some hesitators. "I am not sure about trying this today". "I would rather look for strength". "I think we can go deeper first". "I will wait for a better entry". To you: also well done. Because you firstly are able to believe in a plan (you likely have some good data to back you), and you have a mindset of selectivity. Which is prone to learning methodically what to look for, ready to be autonomous, you just don't know exactly what it is. The only danger is: you are now prone to FOMO after my anticipated classic first "guaranteed" reaction played out locally. So you may feel like you missed the best entry already, have to sweat a few hours. With price never going back to the low. Is that possible? Not necessarily. But is this a missed shot? Let's assume it is, then I would say: missing trades is okay. But missing trades when a setup is clearly prone is less ideal (missing a 2RR trade when your setup has formed is the same as taking two losses, because your setup forming gets you prone to enter). And then finally, there were the few funny "bears". Saying: "we're going to drop from here, your plan is bad, we are going to 67k tonight" etc etc etc. Also all power to you. You believe what you want. You don't follow or believe in my core edge and framework and I am not telling you to. You may have your own reasons why you think the market goes somewhere and it could be better. But you are also the beginners, who simply don't know how to form a plan. We all start somewhere and awareness is key. So the flow chart goes: 1/ Believers in my plan (strongly): taken the entry 2/ Believers in my plan: but hesitating/waiting it out 3/ Non-believers in my plan. (the bears, the beginners) These three bullet points are the foundational decisions every single trader makes, every single time he sees, or creates a plan. To get to 1/ or 2/, it already takes some reasonably strong foundations. 3/ could be anything: either just watching, you are very skilled and have very good reasons to believe your own plan. Or, you hop from one plan to plan from one idea to the next, not even sure what to believe, because you don't know what drives markets. Further steps For each group: what are the next steps? 1/ are the ones who have been rewarded. They took the trade with authority and are now up 700$. The initial sweet "guaranteed" reaction. What do you do next? There are options. First thing you can do, is just hold. Hold and risk going back underwater. Psychologically? Fine now, but as soon as price goes back to BE, you will start to sweat. Going underwater? Even more sweat. Going deeper underwater? (Yet my plan is still valid): you may capitulate. Plan still works out in the end: very deep regret because you lost a trade which should have been a win. Sound familiar? Better alternative: trim your trade at the first next liquidity area. Well Astro, where is it? I am telling you now, it's right here, right now at the time of this post. But to repeat it yourself, that is where edge comes in. Because you have to know. It's not excessively hard to determine though. If you don't know, it also makes sense to just guess the trim (at 700-800 dollars, or if you have anxiety of price: just wait until the next H6 close after a "good" move), and then adapt the SL so that your portion of profits, after SL hitting, no longer results in a loss. And you have a (stress) free trade. And use: Trim % = 1/(1+RR). For me it's up 1.2 RR right now so Trim % = 45% to fully eliminate risk. If the trade gets stopped out later, then you get a free entry lower, look for a reaction and repeat the process. If it runs to target, you get a big payout, because you just refined an entry with a tight SL (This SL here is just 1% tight), potentially catching a massive swing trade move, all for free and just one day of, relatively easy work if you know how to do it. Where to put SL? I'm trying to keep the post short, maybe for another post. Choosing the low is okay. Choosing right under key liquidity you may find is better ("allowing for a sweep") This is a classic example of how you: miss less trades, feel far less stress, and score huge runners for big pay outs, rapidly scaling your account, with the cost: just a bit of finesse. 2/ You are still hesitating. A harder case... and it all depends on what your initial thoughts are. But since you have missed the right action (enter around my time of posting), you are subjected to wrong actions (fomo higher, which is bad, or revenge short "towards a better entry") etc, also bad and not according to plan. You are also possibly psychologically frozen out of actions. If price goes deeper, you continue to hesitate. Recipe for disaster. Because markets love performing fakeouts or fake moves and if you don't understand those, you may get sucked in each time since you are not positioned. Compare that to 1/ who is just relaxing, monitoring, waiting for price to move. This is how liquidity is generated. But you are very close to being successful because all you need is just that timing to enter. Not so hard of a step. 3/ You don't believe my plan. In the (let's humbly say) rare cases my plan fails: you will feel like a genius. "I knew it". "Astro is wrong". "I was right". "Let me write that in the comments". I will applaud you. And probably say something like: "I was wrong, I didn't lose money, but yes I was wrong, and you were right" and I would ask you: "But did you execute?". And you would hesitate. Or in the business as usual case where my plan works, price goes up here to swing targets, where the overall plan clearly played out. You may feel like you missed price, or "admit you were wrong", maybe even performed a few executions in between. "Shoot, maybe he was right let me long". No matter which one of these is yours, it's likely one of them, and for each, exists a solution (if you want to learn). You are 1/ means you probably don't need much refinement if you know exactly where the liquidity is to TP, if you can anticipate these guaranteed reactions, and already have a strong understanding If you are 2/ you already know what plans to believe in, or can put conviction in a plan even if wrong. You just don't know how to execute on it in a refined, safe and stress free way. Costing you lots of capital, more than it should perhaps. Certainly the most frustrating phase because you are so close to success yet the most prone to overtrading, or some emotional leakage. (Classic valley of despair). If you are 3/ you either don't care about it, or you don't know how to form a plan in the first place and are a beginner. Your options are funnily enough quite broad. You could simply learn how to enter first, and just in good faith, let a runner go hoping price magically goes in the direction. If you get really good at just spotting reactions, you could actually become consistently profitable. Are you could learn to form plans and enter broadly first, going through the psychological stress. The second route is the most logical, the first route may be the most stress free route funnily enough. Most perform a hybrid and learn both someway along the way. The key is awareness to what you are missing. My next steps? Since I longed at 77093 (and didn't try to make it obvious), I know there is some liquidity at 73.7k, so I go ahead and make it risk free right here, adapt the SL ("Below the low", mine is slightly different, just not trying to show how bybit can make an easy 1 mil+ on me), potentially setting me up for a massive run to our swing trade targets. I hope this has been insightful. A deep dive into how I trade every single step of the way, and how institutions do it as well (with some variations, I am just "retail" after all). Sound like an extensive process. But aside from the fact that I was able to write it in one post, it's the same process, every single time, for every single trade. Do it once and do it a few times, become confident, and you can do it again and again and again, scaling capital fast. Suddenly, your life changes, drastically.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc The next long, and the plan for our fifth win in a row Now that I have reminded you of the high timeframe outlines, more specifically, my high timeframe outlines and ideas, and now that you have been reminded that a bearish stance has been right from 83k and down. But that a bearish stance is no longer correct imo i.e. is wrong here, It's time to specify more and shift down one timeframe, the daily. Usually some plan creation steps I skip, I just call the trade entry/exit, give my reasoning, and leave. But with the last 4 trades being a perfect 4, for number 5 (at least start) make you think about how you will approach this very highly anticipated long we have been posting about very loudly and clearly. Indeed, this time, I am not immediately giving you the spoon-fed exact moment I am long, at least, as of yet. I might in the future. But I just want you to forget one trade in dozens I call out every month, and try to learn the lifechanging skill, of execution, with the plan already given just for this one. Because I have drawn the plan out right in front of you, on a silver platter with max clarity. ➡️My bias is bullish ➡️I am looking to long right here, right now ➡️I am giving you the exact zone to long ➡️I am giving you the exact targets I am looking at (keep in mind, estimates for now, I want liquidity pools to appear but this is where I expect them to form, but regardless, good baseline steps) So I am giving you everything needed to make money. The only thing I have not given you, is the moment of when to press the button. This plan, is fully functional, fully operational and can be created with simply my framework, my core edge and what I shared over the years. Invaluable to make money. And, in reality, this plan is clearly detailed enough to simply long here already in theory: enter here, stoploss below the zone, targets shown. And with a humble word of own NFA, if you just found out about me, therefore potentially have no long runners from below, have 0 long exposure, it wouldn't even be that bad. So let's use it as a baseline framework and take the trade that way. But, for the trader looking for setups every week, we all know that pressing buttons is harder, draining, if not the hardest thing, let alone holding through it. That is why no one dares to show it (it exposes everyone immediately of how many of them probably can't trade profitably consistently). Now a good plan and bias is mandatory because it's one you can be confident in, which already helps execution a lot. But when executing like this, it still feels slightly in the direction of relying on good faith partly speaking, especially when you are a little nervous that day, fragile or with things on your mind for whatever reason. And especially true with hundreds of thousands on the line. But frankly any capital significant to the beholder (higher risk, higher gain trades) has this effect. That is why my own live executions I have been sharing on X, aren't just simply: "enter here SL there, target here". They are refined institutional positioning strategies, dynamical SL selection and liquidity pool targeting with monitoring there after. To give the view behind the scenes. A little bit of extra effort, getting you a long way of more refined, comfortable trading, no matter the size. Exactly what institutions do. It helps you position, take multiple entries properly. It helps you find accurate entries, and it even helps you find swing trade targets and follow through. Today's order flow technology is strong. It is so strong that it can even help you trade and do it very well using nothing else. And many who can't use a classic systems rely on it on their own. But the problem is that there is a lot of information overload. That's partly why refined execution is not mastered very widely nor is material available online. Yet that is exactly the missing piece, of, after plan creation, executing this trade with less stress than just entering here, going to target, and with a defined SL and holding your breath for days on end. Although, it still can be done. Why would you though. Some like it. I prefer refinement and surgical approach. Don't let "just having this plan" in front of you stop you though. You know my record and accuracy, so you can use this plan as a strong baseline for the next trade idea I have in mind to (hopefully) secure the fifth W in a row. But I would be bluffing if I said I won't try to refine execution while looking at this, so that L's still turn into BE's, and BE's still turn into W's, boosting your overall win rate and consistency in tricky bear phases, even more so in straightforward bull phases. So let's see, no matter which way you choose to approach it, whether you turn this into a W or not, and how much stumbling happened along the way. This test will be invaluable feedback for your own skill. Maybe you are closer than you think.

English
33
25
349
61.7K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc The next long, and the plan for our fifth win in a row Now that I have reminded you of the high timeframe outlines, more specifically, my high timeframe outlines and ideas, and now that you have been reminded that a bearish stance has been right from 83k and down. But that a bearish stance is no longer correct imo i.e. is wrong here, It's time to specify more and shift down one timeframe, the daily. Usually some plan creation steps I skip, I just call the trade entry/exit, give my reasoning, and leave. But with the last 4 trades being a perfect 4, for number 5 (at least start) make you think about how you will approach this very highly anticipated long we have been posting about very loudly and clearly. Indeed, this time, I am not immediately giving you the spoon-fed exact moment I am long, at least, as of yet. I might in the future. But I just want you to forget one trade in dozens I call out every month, and try to learn the lifechanging skill, of execution, with the plan already given just for this one. Because I have drawn the plan out right in front of you, on a silver platter with max clarity. ➡️My bias is bullish ➡️I am looking to long right here, right now ➡️I am giving you the exact zone to long ➡️I am giving you the exact targets I am looking at (keep in mind, estimates for now, I want liquidity pools to appear but this is where I expect them to form, but regardless, good baseline steps) So I am giving you everything needed to make money. The only thing I have not given you, is the moment of when to press the button. This plan, is fully functional, fully operational and can be created with simply my framework, my core edge and what I shared over the years. Invaluable to make money. And, in reality, this plan is clearly detailed enough to simply long here already in theory: enter here, stoploss below the zone, targets shown. And with a humble word of own NFA, if you just found out about me, therefore potentially have no long runners from below, have 0 long exposure, it wouldn't even be that bad. So let's use it as a baseline framework and take the trade that way. But, for the trader looking for setups every week, we all know that pressing buttons is harder, draining, if not the hardest thing, let alone holding through it. That is why no one dares to show it (it exposes everyone immediately of how many of them probably can't trade profitably consistently). Now a good plan and bias is mandatory because it's one you can be confident in, which already helps execution a lot. But when executing like this, it still feels slightly in the direction of relying on good faith partly speaking, especially when you are a little nervous that day, fragile or with things on your mind for whatever reason. And especially true with hundreds of thousands on the line. But frankly any capital significant to the beholder (higher risk, higher gain trades) has this effect. That is why my own live executions I have been sharing on X, aren't just simply: "enter here SL there, target here". They are refined institutional positioning strategies, dynamical SL selection and liquidity pool targeting with monitoring there after. To give the view behind the scenes. A little bit of extra effort, getting you a long way of more refined, comfortable trading, no matter the size. Exactly what institutions do. It helps you position, take multiple entries properly. It helps you find accurate entries, and it even helps you find swing trade targets and follow through. Today's order flow technology is strong. It is so strong that it can even help you trade and do it very well using nothing else. And many who can't use a classic systems rely on it on their own. But the problem is that there is a lot of information overload. That's partly why refined execution is not mastered very widely nor is material available online. Yet that is exactly the missing piece, of, after plan creation, executing this trade with less stress than just entering here, going to target, and with a defined SL and holding your breath for days on end. Although, it still can be done. Why would you though. Some like it. I prefer refinement and surgical approach. Don't let "just having this plan" in front of you stop you though. You know my record and accuracy, so you can use this plan as a strong baseline for the next trade idea I have in mind to (hopefully) secure the fifth W in a row. But I would be bluffing if I said I won't try to refine execution while looking at this, so that L's still turn into BE's, and BE's still turn into W's, boosting your overall win rate and consistency in tricky bear phases, even more so in straightforward bull phases. So let's see, no matter which way you choose to approach it, whether you turn this into a W or not, and how much stumbling happened along the way. This test will be invaluable feedback for your own skill. Maybe you are closer than you think.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC A reminder of where we are, and where we are going. And my higher low estimate reminded. Before I take or frame or even talk about any longs publicly here, What many people need the most right now, is a reminder, of where we have come from, and where we are now. Because like absolute clockwork, the timeline is being absolutely flooded again with all the bears popping up, making a high frequency of posts again right out of the fog of long and forgotten. That common denominator presents itself in other comments, and even mine. That is frustrating to read. Because despite the endless effort, 1 emotional post taken seriously can ruin quite a lot of that. So, it's up to me to remind you and set it right, of what the market's true intended direction is here IMO, and how it's tracking like clockwork, right as the bears come out again. Of course, they all do it when the best shorts have already sailed and price nearly bottomed, classic. I mean frequency started ramping up 4 fold just Today. That behaviour, is not the first time. In fact it happens every leg on the weekly. So let me remind you of the story and context so far, so you can understand Today what it's about. Before you read on, no one is targeted, this isn't directed at anyone specifically. These are just my clear comments that are as hard to unsee as an elephant balancing on a tiny beach ball. I am sharing this context because only context helps you to understand why they are doing it again now. During the exact bottom, which we in advance estimated to be 63k, then turned out 60k, the majority of bears were very loud, not only saying we would see 50k, but also: "we would see lower lows in Q4" (remember this, this is important later). We took it as a sign, followed with an estimate and confirmed with all the data, and took action on major longs, which, resulted in our first two runners now. Then, we relentlessly pushed into the first high, and then went ahead and made a major higher low around 66k. That is another major zone we have turned very interested in longs again. Resulted in our third and fourth (and fifth, closed at 81k) runners now total. FYI, it is also when I created the post in the quoted tweet, 66k. The next narrative, was during the run off 66k into the high, we estimated as 81k, and which turned out to be 83k. With a very very interesting sentiment: of the bears suddenly starting to actively admit they were wrong, or going quiet. 83k was higher than I expected personally, but with that sentiment the data we posted and the order flow I also highlighted bits and pieces of, and with my estimates of 75k coming again first, and then the higher low forming in the low 70's, like absolute clockwork, here they are all again, active, posting frequently, and "in their swing shorts". Like Harry Houdini, pulling up their conviction again as if it never left. All whilst this zone is highly sensitive on the monthly here to form a higher low. All whilst our estimates seem to have arrived just once more quite reasonably well, for more accurate profits and trades. All while we have our trademarked data shape up once again (for fun: check some volatility indicators (such as vix fix, check some price action indicators (such as long term whale filtered trend exhaustion and high timeframe volume burst, and some misc indicators such as hash ribbons, production cost, and a few more nice ones I showed you). We also have very distinct trademarked order flow signatures above, the same we had for the drop to 74.1k, all uniquely shaping up for the same type of move we already had twice in this range. It never stops to please me, how clockwork-like the sentiment interacts with the average trader, and mostly against the way the market actually goes, just like how the news interacts with markets. So I believe, this is an important reminder, for today, this move, this market, and the reason I am actively looking for longs again after a short hibernation, coming off the 83k high, to keep in mind where we are now and where we have come from, to see where we are going. And I could be wrong, it's always possible. Let's not risk it all. But let's keep risking what has already given us the 91.4%+ wins over the last 2 years I have been showing on X, all publicly visible and trackable with live timestamps on my timeline. Be reminded. Thank you.

English
59
37
420
126.2K
SwissBird 🇨🇭
SwissBird 🇨🇭@forestbirdp·
@astronomer_zero I think this should be restriced to the audience in the Codex Edge Codex sir, I don't like to see this here after I was allowed to get in there
English
1
0
1
43
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
Introducing the Astro Order Flow & Institutional Framework This is the culmination of years spent reading markets the way institutions do: uncovering liquidity, understanding order flow, and executing with precision. Now, for the first time, I’m working on offering the exact framework I’ve refined over the years to filter noise, identify positioning, and navigate markets with clarity. You voted for it, and I listened. After years of keeping this side of my process fully private, I’ve spent recent months carefully structuring and refining the clearest way to finally share it properly. I’m getting ready to reveal how I identify institutional positioning, order flow imbalances, and high precision execution, whilst integrating it into a complete trading framework designed to function as a standalone system in itself. Eliminating intuition, eliminating guesswork. Just structured logic, repeatable execution, and a deeper understanding of how markets actually move. Over time, after beginning the process of opening up more of my trading systems publicly, many of you started asking for the next layer: the detailed structure behind the calls, the logic behind the positioning, and the framework I personally rely on. So there you go, still undergoing preparation as effectively as me (and my team) can handle, but it should be ready the coming week. This is indeed my complete institutional framework at hand: a system designed to remove noise, reduce emotional decision making, and focus on how major market participants actually position and execute. Some further teases of what is coming: ✔️ 3 institutional-level execution frameworks ✔️ Order flow methodology built around real liquidity shifts and liquidity pool targeting ✔️ My infamous order flow signatures ✔️ My institutional invalidation strategy in full detail, keeping you hidden from SL hunts ✔️ Step-by-step logic designed to remove discretionary confusion of entering and exiting position ✔️ Practical executions that appear regularly and teach you to think structurally ✔️ Designed to give you full independence, no blind following, not even of me If you’ve followed my market navigation over the years, then you already know the track record. Now, I’m offering the framework behind it. To be candid, releasing this wasn’t easy either. As a matter of fact, it still isn’t fully released yet, and there are still final confirmations and mentor permissions I need to work through properly behind the scenes. But once I began the process of opening up the systems I’ve built over the years, this naturally became part of that culmination. And equally important, the systems I have built to protect the framework itself whilst still allowing me to share it properly with you, are now battle tested and give me the confidence to finally move forward with this release whilst keeping the edge itself protected. I’m proud of what has been built, and even more motivated to help serious traders break through the noise properly. If all goes well, further details will follow as I continue refining the final execution and structure behind the framework. As always, this is not financial advice, just a window into the framework that heavily refined, or with (humble) honesty: frankly changed, the way I personally trade.
Astronomer tweet media
English
84
13
413
55.7K
Imanol
Imanol@ihargom·
El nuevo Ferrari eléctrico. Diseñado por Jonn Eve, el anterior diseñador de Apple. No se que opinaréis pero yo mandaba al Sr Eve de vuelta a montar iPhones.
Español
1.3K
382
4.6K
918.5K
Yusei
Yusei@0xYusei·
Following a quieter period, here’s an update on Reflect. I have decided to wind up @RFLnow. The project may be acquired or resumed under new management, but I will no longer be running it. Several offers are on the table right now. I believe this is the right decision.
English
10
3
22
4.2K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🇨🇳 NEW: China has developed autonomous robots designed to clean pollution from rivers and lakes without human operators.
English
166
298
2.7K
266.4K
SwissBird 🇨🇭
SwissBird 🇨🇭@forestbirdp·
@coinfessions Sounds ridicolous, but I have lived through something similar, you can't believe till you have seen it by yourself what greed is doing to you, in hindsight it's inbelievable how stupid human beings can act
English
0
0
0
152
Coinfessions
Coinfessions@coinfessions·
I turned 10k into 350k and lost it all while now having to work for $23 an hour.
English
67
25
929
48.6K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc longs I'm back online and can monitor again: I entered again. Alright, back after 8 hours of offline. Meanwhile the long setup as mentioned last time is still valid and active. Was away for 8 hours, exited at the exact entry price, and ironically, price is still at the exact same level as if nothing happened, so I'm entering again. Same plan, same idea, same strategy, and same goal. Weekly bias: bullish Daily bias: bearish Hourly bias: leaning bullish (countertrend against daily). And in alignment with those biases when they zig-zag as of current: build long term positions in alignment with the weekly bias (runners and spot), build big hedges with daily bias (shorts active as main trades this week), and countertrend local plays with hourly bias. Confirming order flow, we have more longs unravelling un panic somewhat. The order books, where we had a large number of asks above us have also been released, which adds to the narrative that large capital filled here for a local squeeze. The only issue I have are the TPO charts, with still weak lows below. But they also have weak lows above so it's a fifty-fifty on only one confluence. We're still holding the daily POI we mapped out days ago and we're reaction textbook to it in alignment with expectations, so I'm still going off of that. In alignment with the pattern of the week, I would mind a red Monday, neutral Tuesday into lightly bullish Wednesday where Thursday reverses and Friday chops/goes down again, or something similar. That's still my plan and I'm back now to execute it so without further ado.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc longs Closed be for now, don't like reaction so far. Alright quick post. Still believe in the long idea but just closing be because I don't like the reaction. Also can't monitor for the next 8 hours. My promise is to always share every single move I make on $btc so just fyi for my exit In terms of my attachment to trades, still mainly on the frame of a short to 75k until it (finally) gets taken out, so conviction in shorts remains highest, and this is a countertrade idea as you know hence my aggressive exit be. I do think it plays out. But it's not worth holding a trade through for me with a slow reaction and not being able to monitor when it's a countertrend play which needs active monitoring. Also doesn't help how longs are building up hard in this local consolidation. Main goal is to short the lower high if given (still think it will form), or bank final short profits if we finally hit 75k. Still looking to relong with higher conviction below 75k.

English
29
9
251
68K
SwissBird 🇨🇭 retweetledi
MASTR
MASTR@MastrXYZ·
Fuck you. Some of you are panic posting about a few reported hantavirus cases as if the sky just cracked open. Perspective matters: The WHO estimates 10,000 to over 100,000 hantavirus infections worldwide every year. That means roughly 27 to 274 new infections every single day somewhere on this planet. Every year. The EU and EEA alone reported 1,885 cases in 2023. The US has recorded 890 lab confirmed cases since surveillance began in 1993. So ffs no, hantavirus did not suddenly appear this week. It occurs repeatedly in several dozen countries worldwide, especially across Asia, Europe and the Americas Yes, it is serious. Yes, the Andes strain matters because rare human to human transmission is possible in close contact. Yes, deaths are tragic and should never be treated lightly. But turning a small cluster into apocalypse content is fucking fear farming.
Leading Report@LeadingReport

Hantavirus exposure may have reached up to 12 countries, per WHO.

English
31
17
118
10.3K
SwissBird 🇨🇭
SwissBird 🇨🇭@forestbirdp·
@astronomer_zero The best thing about your posts besides the outstanding accuracy is the high level of honest reflection
English
3
0
14
649
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
bitcoin:native Plan for trade #5 this week: still looking to long (not in it yet) Alright, 4 trades entered so far since Monday. Certainly higher than my usual frequency. Goes with volatility. So far a small short win followed by a small short loss. A normal long win and just had a long BE again. My cap on trades per week is 5 so one more try unless I have a very good reason to go over it. Part of me wants to just monitor the next trade idea. But given I have taken mostly small trades this week and how have been handling them aggressively/cautiously while we are awaiting for strong acceptance up or getting the last pullback over with, I'm still actively looking for another trade. Market is still tradeable up to 83k as long as we hold 81k, and we are still holding it. So the plan is clear. We do have the risk still open for lower, still very much in the grey area now that we have volume and resistance again in the 81-83k zone with recent price action. If we lose the hedge level, that's not great for longs. But so far we have been holding it since the day we mapped it out so that's still good for the bulls and that should be respected. Not trying to trade my PnL, but certainly not trying to end up red either this week. Currently 0.4 R in the green, so going for a 0.4 R risk long to try and increase that since we still have the idea open. If it ends in a loss, that's full stop for me plus some evaluation since trading has been slightly messier this week, apologies. Great way to end the story would be with one more great trade, we'll see, no need to force it. Yes, in hindsight, I should have just held the last long from 75k which I fumbled. But there's no living in the past, I don't think just ignoring the FOMC reversal was the right move regardless even if it has been invalidated. It certainly slowed the PnL curve as well as causing some mental strain. We'll see. Hope to spot a good trade, still a long for now next, not in it yet. I'd like some confirmation during New York Open.
Astronomer tweet media
English
26
7
186
45.2K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🚨 JUST IN: Apple's iOS 27 will let users choose third-party AI models including Claude and Gemini to power features across its devices.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
75
148
1.3K
65.3K
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC long runners (TP 1 out of 5) We are just above 81k, fully closing first long. Alright, as per plan, closing the first long runner of the entire collection of longs we collected. If you have traded along, reminding you to close the most recent one (this one is taken at 71.5k). This because the risk of a local 5% ish drop still exists, so TP'ing this one here would allow to pick up the same long again + leave a runner for free. We are still working on the reclaim of 81k, it's still not fully established, we have the order books ready and set for a big squeeze, but it still needs to happen. Tuesday isn't the ideal day, but trend shifts don't wait for the right time, they just go, so it's wait and see. The most strategic move is to bank in the first runner at the very start of the breakout. We have been patient, lets pay ourselves.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC We have collected 5 runners by now for the breakout, here is my TP strategy. Alright, we are at a pivotal point in price at the moment. We are about to break into the pivotal low from last range (81k). If this is a bear market and we were to see new lows, that typically doesn't happen, nor does it happen in market maker models. So while I am not a "reclaim trader", this is one reclaim that matters a lot and one I care about. Besides, I am not trading it here, that is way too late, we have been trading it since the very start of the range, off 60k. We know the breakout is coming. Because my confluences of why we are bullish, go well beyond that. I don't have to repeat them, nor can I do that efficiently in just 1 post. But it means we could start to trend and what was our bottom call on Feb 6th, with increased boldness on Feb 15th to hold long runners the entire range (quoted tweet), now turned into exactly the HL structure we wanted to see. A higher low structure, by definition, allows us to hold every long on every higher low we took. In our dashboard, we collected 5, on the backbone of our strategy all the way into the breakout. We have now come to that very point potentially. So now it's time to reveal the opposite, which is my take profit strategy once 81k is crossed. This is by the way a general strategy I apply in a scenario of reversal (bottom in this case) range, that is at the same time a higher low structure, very logical, easily applied, and maximised towards making profit with as little effort (and prediction power) as possible. And although I often know exactly where the market is going, I sometimes don't or I risk where I do not want the market to go to protect positions whenever it makes the most sense especially when follow through is limited (such as the recent short). That's why my trades are optimized minimal prediction effort. At the same time, that's how overtrading over overconfident trading is eliminated. And this building runners -> taking profit strategy we used for this entire range is tailored for that. So the way of approach is simple. Since we are nearing the 81k pivotal point, the decisive point where arguably many bears capitulate, fomo kicks in and that moment of silence happens, because the staircase, market maker model is fully invalidated with no dispute possible. Yes, some bears will once again move their goalposts, hold underwater even further, or other disastrous management "styles", but the clear case and point is that 81k reclaim is a shift. So at the same time, that's also where my first TP is, of the first long runner. And by first, I mean last. Since the way I am going to TP these, is by TP'ing the one with the highest entry the earliest, because when price retraces back into the range, they are the first to be threatened. You can see the SL's on the screen, they are non negotiable or they lose their role as runners. This strategy holds because my size on most trades is fairly consistent and my losses scale with the SL width (institutional trading). If you size your trades with SL width, narrowed SL, bigger trade size and vice versa (not recommended but some like it that way), then arguably holding the tightest SL runners for longer results in the highest pay-out, or TP'ing the tightest SL's at the strongest resistances on the way up is probability optimized. So my strategy is simple, where I TP the runners one by one, as we reach higher and higher, and the higher we reach, the older the TP'd runner will be. Now the question: do I think we go to ATH and where are the exact TP's? I have simply drafted an example of the screen (where the green ends is where I TP). These are just the idea and still subject to change. But I did mention that my last runner will be TP'd at ath, which is exactly what I aim for, indeed. And given the local resistance, and magnets below (we still have yet to claim 81k), I am looking to TP the last one, entered at 71.4k, first and very soon: just above 81k and into the brink of confirmation of claiming the level. In case we still get 75k-, that simply allows us to pick up that long again, so it's not even a loss per se. Also a chance to pick up that fumbled long in recent time, which I added on the chart too for context and full transparency. That is the optimal strategy for me, going into this trend in the hopes to reclaim 81k. Does it make sense to go for a breakout long on top? I know it's frustrating to hear: but not in these conditions yet, clearly not with risk of 75k- still open, no reclaim of 81k yet, and after playing on and off with a short idea still technically playable (but not worth the risk for me anymore once 81k is crossed). So, that's my plan. I think very clearly, to unravel the months of preparations for this potential moment. Just showing the outlines of how a range + breakout should be played when anticipating a range of higher lows, where long runners are easily compoundable. Mind you, this type of plan is also applicable for other type of ranges with a sweep at the end. But then all the longs have to be built in the last leg which is more tricky and then it makes more sense to hold for example half (50%) of the long of the last sweep, and TP that gradually into high, post-breakout territory. In this case, we planned for and received a HL structure (so far), so we trade exactly that. No hopium, no wishful thinking, just planning what we expect to see, and then trading exactly what we see. Enjoy. Let's see if we go straight up, or see one last dip (one that I am not shorting). To be fair, I had enough of the sub 50k posts, or even new low expectations all over the timeline. And until still today, the goalpost moving. Being bearish is great for engagement, if the market goes down they were right and if it goes up, they made money since most of them are all BTC holders.

English
9
8
164
21.1K