ふかくさ
208.4K posts

ふかくさ
@fukaxa
哲学サークル運営。ヘーゲル研究者ワナビ。ASD。同棲中。AIキッズ。 noteブログ https://t.co/vcO6MLnu6t youtube https://t.co/n0wbHqcYov


【平和と加害は表裏】東浩紀が考える戦争時代の哲学/イラン攻撃容認は日本にリスク/ポケモンバトル化する国際政治/平和国家と核武装の両立? <混乱する世界に必要とされる平和の哲学について、大著『平和と愚かさ』を発表した東さんに、広野真嗣さんが話を聞きました> youtu.be/ymzSOue6dc4

プロジェクトヘイルメアリーの原文を訳文と比較しつつ読んでみる。

wow, amazing anti aging news/paper. This is Huge. Here's why. Reseachers in new review published in Nature reframe ageing as a system wide failure of epigenetic control, not just random damage, but a coordinated breakdown of the system that keeps your cells knowing what they are. In other words: ageing isn’t just wear and tear, but loss of biological information and control. The authors introduce a systems level framework showing that ageing happens when "epigenetic fidelity" collapses, the ability of cells to maintain precise gene expression over time. And they identify 4 interconnected failure modes: 1. Nuclear architecture breaks down. The physical structure of DNA organization deteriorates. Chromatin domains lose their integrity. 2. Epigenetic memory gets scrambled. Systems that maintain gene “on/off” states (like PRC2) stop working properly. 3. Nucleosome instability increases. Histone changes (like H3.3 accumulation) disrupt DNA packaging. 4. Transcription gets reprogrammed. Gene expression patterns drift away from their original identity. And these don’t happen in isolation, they feed into each other, creating cascading failure across the cell. Why this is a HUGE deal It’s a unifying theory. It explains why ageing affects so many systems at once. It connects previously separate ageing mechanisms into one network. It shows ageing is systemic and programmable, not purely random. It turns ageing into something that looks…engineerable. Instead of targeting individual damage, this framework suggests we can target the epigenetic system itself. Potentially reverse multiple ageing features at once. Because these systems are interconnected, fixing the control layer could fix everything downstream. This paper is basically saying: Ageing = loss of biological information integrity And that’s massive, almost insane because: Information loss is reversible in principle. It aligns with ideas like cellular reprogramming. It suggests ageing could be treated like a software problem, not just hardware damage.








