Phileas

Why does the weekly limit feel like the 5h window now?

@mirochill Indeed. Its the most intuitive and clean one i have seen so far. I really hope they steal it.

🔥 J’ai personnalisé mon sélecteur de modèle grâce à GPT-5.6 Sol ! J’ai vu beaucoup de personnes proposer leurs propres idées de sélecteur, alors j’ai décidé d’inventer le mien et de demander à Codex de le mettre en place. Sans vouloir me vanter, je pense que c’est le meilleur sélecteur imaginé jusqu’à présent. @thsottiaux, il faudrait peut-être s’en inspirer ? 👀

We really need an improvement for the remote feature on ChatGBT. There is close to no control and observability over the codex app... Please fix that.

@TrollFootball What about portugal?

@corbin_braun More lines = more vulnerabilities

Fable 5 just prints

@Syona_rose 10x better at sucking

Windows is literally 10x better than Linux. People just don't want to admit it

@Anas_founder Clearly Fable 5. I heavily tested it and it wasnt that big of a jump for LLMs as everyone on X was stating.

Be honest: Which AI model is this? 👇

@VadimStrizheus GBT 5.6 pro > GBT 5.6 Ultra > FABLE 5 Ultra GLM 5.2 is great but not comparable with them.

As a founder, which AI model do you prefer? 1. Fable 5 2. GPT 5.6 3. GLM 5.2

@sayoojkeloth @rezoundous Im investing into this prediciton. You actually 2 steps ahead...

@rezoundous probably anthropic monday post: fable 5 now available in our new ultra max $500/month subscription

I can already smell $500 AI plans coming

@rezoundous GBT 5.6 Sol Ultra has far better reasoning. Fable is mostly worth using as a pre architecture constructor.

Fable 5 as orchestrator GPT-5.6 as executor this has been the best setup for me currently. what's yours?

They really wanna shoot themselves in the foot... Aint no one paying for a 20x then! Grok 4.5 here i come.

GBT 5.6 pro is AGI. Fable isnt even close to this reasoning level.

@thsottiaux Larp... It is a fumble!

Or a generational run. We will continue to make tweaks and we have a TON coming for developers. Meanwhile traffic yesterday sat at ~2X previous peak, team is scrambling to keep everything up and reliable. Time will tell, but I have conviction that attempting to build the one interface to AGI is worthwhile.

@BuildFastWithAI Ngl GLM 5.2 did the best.

We tested Fable 5, Grok 4.5, GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra, and GLM 5.2 on the same arcade game prompt. This was the result : Claude Fable 5 - the smoothest gameplay of the four. fluid movement, no jank. Grok 4.5 - nailed the screen shake, particle explosions, neon cinematics. most visually dramatic build. GPT 5.6 Sol - the all-rounder. genuinely great gameplay experience, nothing broken, everything solid. GLM 5.2 - an open-weight model shipping a complete, playable build that held its own against three closed frontier models. Which one did you like the most?

@thebuggeddev GBT was never good for frontend... Its just good for technical stuff

Eh, i'm really not impressed by GPT 5.6 sol lol. Asked it to recreate a 3 screen app design with image generation skill. Given how well it performs on benchmarks, I expected a lot more but the results were pretty ehhh. Not even close. Maybe I need to try harder but then... wasn't it supposed to do better?

Whats the point of benchmarking Fable or GBT 5.6 if we all use them just for planning and its general intelligence? Whats the best reasoning benchmark?

Who is the most intelligent?

@bridgemindai Bro i actually like GBT 5.6 more?

GPT 5.6 is NOT on the same level as Claude Fable 5. Check out the BridgeBench lava lamp test. Claude Fable 5 produces far better UI designs compared with GPT 5.6. GPT 5.6 is a step up compared with GPT 5.5, but not on the same level as Fable 5.

Is this ragebait? Where is my beloved GBT 5.6? I already miss it😭

@melvynx One more hour... Its always 10am

when is gpt 5.6 arriving exactly lol ?