Obversus

3.3K posts

Obversus

Obversus

@geekof92

Liking any of my tweets doesn't mean you agree with all of them. Nuance matters.

Katılım Eylül 2016
2K Takip Edilen89 Takipçiler
Obversus
Obversus@geekof92·
@ScottPresler @LeaderJohnThune “Pass the Save Act, salvage what’s left of your career. Please. Neither of us want you to retire a failure.” End of meeting.
English
0
0
1
14
Obversus retweetledi
C3
C3@C_3C_3·
Sitting down? 1970: 8 welfare programs 2026: 80+ welfare programs 1970: 1 million illegals 2026: 50+ million illegals 1970: 4% foreign born population 2026: 16% foreign born population 1970: $371 billion Debt 2026: $39 trillion Debt The planned demolition of America. Sick.
English
507
9.7K
26.2K
295.6K
Obversus retweetledi
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand. "Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣ "For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣ This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣). The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed. The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence. I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.
Dries Van Langenhove tweet media
English
535
3K
9.7K
184.2K
Obversus retweetledi
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
A very sad announcement. I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration. In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least. Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration. In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence. Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth. Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration." You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible. Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it. The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration. Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail. Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win. If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM. If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
Dries Van Langenhove tweet media
English
2.5K
17.5K
64.4K
4.6M
Obversus
Obversus@geekof92·
@HydeSynister Cooking is a necessary skill for life and having supplies for at least three home cooked meal options is necessary for dealing with a hangry wife. Bonus points if you cooked her those meals while you were dating so they have sentimental value too. Desserts don’t count.
English
0
0
1
13
HydeSynister
HydeSynister@HydeSynister·
As a man, you should be ready and able to fully look after your woman. Cooking is such a personal thing and its very underappreciated in modern times. Lads, get the cookbooks out and treat your ladies 👨‍🍳
Josephine@_josephine0_

In your opinion.

English
15
3
66
1.4K
Obversus retweetledi
​𝐥𝐲𝐫𝐚
​𝐥𝐲𝐫𝐚@sunnkssdseraph·
A horrifying number of people have not been genuinely held, comforted, touched, or shown physical tenderness in so long that their nervous system has started adapting to affection deprivation as a normal human condition. Over time the body begins adapting to emotional deprivation the same way it adapts to survival conditions: hypervigilance, emotional numbing, difficulty relaxing, chronic loneliness, depression, anxiety, sleep disruption, elevated stress hormones, and eventually a nervous system that no longer fully believes comfort, softness, or safety are meant for it. The human nervous system was never meant to survive this much emotional isolation without consequences. People are adapting to conditions they were never biologically designed to live in.
quote@itsmubashi

Hit me with the harshest reality truth.

English
237
1.8K
14.2K
670.1K
Obversus retweetledi
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
All you had to do was pass the SAVE America Act.
English
537
4.8K
46.9K
312.2K
Obversus
Obversus@geekof92·
@KirscheVerstahl Replacement is a conspiracy theory and you’re a bad person for noticing, but isn’t it great?
English
0
0
2
152
Obversus
Obversus@geekof92·
@KitsuneMizuki Freaks have money. Woman wants money. Everyone else has to suffer the exchange happening in public.
English
0
0
2
48
Obversus
Obversus@geekof92·
@Amalgamyte_VT Nothing burns hotter than the hatred of the ugly and profane for the beautiful and virtuous.
English
0
0
25
503
The Bloooop
The Bloooop@The_Bloooop·
Best Team 🥰
The Bloooop tweet media
English
23
12
116
2K
Crazy Clips
Crazy Clips@crazyclips_·
Bro did he really just call in an air strike with a frog 😭
English
195
3.2K
82.6K
4.1M