Genxdoomer

14.7K posts

Genxdoomer

Genxdoomer

@genxdoomer

Katılım Temmuz 2022
532 Takip Edilen155 Takipçiler
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@SantiagoAuFund @rocinante2d So was the plan to bomb children's schools and hospitals and civilian infrastructure from the start? You're saying the plan from the start was war crimes?
English
0
0
2
22
Santiago Capital
Santiago Capital@SantiagoAuFund·
For those who think the U.S. does not have a plan with regards to Iran, pls answer this one question: If the U.S. has no plan, then why did Iran spend the last 40 years preparing to counter the U.S.'s plan...?
English
402
18
453
71.4K
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@SantiagoAuFund Is the plan to lose all the US bases in the middle east? It's going real well if it is.
English
0
0
0
13
Santiago Capital
Santiago Capital@SantiagoAuFund·
Imagine being confused as to why a military doesn't publicly disclose their war plans to you...
Ross Hendricks@Ross__Hendricks

@SantiagoAuFund I just want to see some evidence that this so-called “plan” exists and is working So far all we see is the most spectacular military defeat since Vietnam At what point do you just take the L on “trusting the plan”

English
65
10
276
25.6K
JustDario 🏊‍♂️
The “For You” of X is so broken, literally a slopfest. Once upon a time I used to find interesting content there, people I never heard before worth a follow. I am currently stuck on “Following” and I am grateful to all my dear followers who point me towards great info and sources
English
30
8
449
11.9K
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@FinanceLancelot Kushner was trying to get a deal with Iran 🤣🤣🤡. Something very off with this kent guy. Scott horton caught him lying multiple times and called him out for it in their recent interview
English
0
0
4
301
Financelot
Financelot@FinanceLancelot·
"The Israelis got nervous about a month ago, because they knew Witkoff and Kushner were actively engaging with the Iranians to get a deal." "That's why the Israelis launched their attack, knowing they could force our hands." - Joe Kent
Financelot@FinanceLancelot

The new narrative is out boys! You're about to fight and die for Israel so oil can drop below $100 per barrel... A problem that didn't exist before Israel attacked Iran. "There is no way out, but through."

English
28
393
2.7K
250.1K
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
That’s the problem- wanting him to be a hero. He’s not a hero. He’s literally just a guy, who was in the room, telling you what happened when he was there and telling you why he left. It’s possible to recognize someone’s testimony as valuable without putting them on a pedestal and asking them to lead.
English
6
0
20
612
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
This is retarded. Not everything is 4D chess. FFS just stop.
Sense Receptor@SenseReceptor

🤯Whitney Webb pitches mind-blowing theory on Joe Kent's real narrative purpose: engineer "anti-semitic, right-leaning domestic terrorists" to feed to the "pre-crime" machine: "[Kent's] an intelligence officer and top CIA guy." "Be careful in trusting 'former spooks' who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away." "Basically, the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." "I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in [Trump's first administration] come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself—even if no one else agrees with the definition—would define as anti-Semitic." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Dore: "What do you make of Joe Kent?" Webb: "Yeah, so with Joe Kent, he's a intelligence officer and top CIA guy. I think a lot of stuff is going on right now, and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about it. But I think people should be careful in trusting former, quote–unquote, former spooks who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away. Because a lot of times what happens is that these figures will do that to build up trust with the public and then they'll misdirect you somewhere else if you're not careful. "So I would advise vigilance and critical thinking, which is often in short supply, but should not be, about, that figure in, in particular. But I think— Dore: "So you think there's like, there might be some kind of a long-game plan with Joe Kent?" Webb: "Oh, yeah. So you saw—" Dore: "So, so I've heard this argument and, and that you know, don't take him as face value, that they're just setting him up to be the next Trump or JD Vance or something and then he's going to do all the horrible thing. So that's—" Webb: "They could. It's very possible, but I don't know how it'll go. But let me give you an example of why I'm really skeptical of him. "So when Trump was, I encourage people to go back and look at the first iteration of the Trump administration to understand what's happening now. And since my career in journalism began during Trump's first term, I thankfully remember a good amount of it. "So, about a year before the January Six event, there was this DHS official and this is the Trump administration, Elizabeth Neuman, I think her name was. She was basically saying, there's going to be a domestic terror event. We can see it building, but we can't quite stop it. It's another 9/11. Oh no. If only we had more surveillance powers and whatever, we could maybe stop this other imminent 9/11, whatever. "And so basically in that hearing, it was a hearing where she was testifying. Top officials from DHS and, and other intelligence agencies were basically painting who is the up-and-coming domestic terrorist profile in the United States, what Americans are domestic terrorists. "And so basically, the— I, I really wish I could remember the specific name of the hearing to direct people to that because it is on C-SPAN, still. But basically, the profile they gave were anti-Semitic Trump supporters or anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists. So I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in Trump One come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself, even if it, no one else agrees with the definition, would define as anti-Semitic." Dore: "So, so what I— explain that again to me because you lost me a little bit right at the end. So you're saying that—" Webb: "Okay, so basically the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." Dore: "And so do you think Joe Kent is, is one of those?" Webb: "So before this era they had the domestic terror threat they were trying to put in front of you were obviously these groups of like Feds, like Patriot Front and the Proud Boys. And all of that. Okay, so how, if you, if, if you can't fake the demographic, how do you engineer the demographic?... "So basically if you have Trump officials that are part of this apparatus claiming right-leaning anti- Semites are domestic terrorists that need to be targeted by this infrastructure and the surveillance infrastructure, in pre-crime and all of that, that's been a part of this buildup of the war on domestic terror. And then you have people coming out and being like we're going to blame, you know, you know, saying what people want to hear because obviously Israel absolutely is intimately involved with getting us involved in the Iran war. "But the other side of it is you create— you, you signal boost that with people like Joe Kent potentially. And then you have people sort of muddy the waters between Israel and all Jewish people, which is not fair. And then you can have the Trump administration swoop in and you know, look at Alexis Wilkins. Foreign government operators are driving these narratives. "It's, it's like reverse Russiagate. And well, I mean I probably should have thought this theory a little bit more before explaining it on your show, but basically I worry that someone like Joe Kent is coming out of, out of nowhere to try and sort of engineer this problem that the US Government has had is we can't make domestic terrorists appear that fit our profile. "So now we want people to create a class of right- leaning populists who basically fit our definition. If we just define anti-Semites as people who are critical of Israel and then we can target these people with our domestic terror infrastructure. So I worry that could be happening."

English
361
36
670
47.9K
Ace
Ace@acethebulllly·
When you’re broke and you don’t have a pot to piss in, you turn into this sad little pleb. Hates the world because everyone else is winning while he’s still crying in the corner. Praying for you… not that it’ll help. 😏 @RealPrinceWily
Ace tweet media
English
8
0
22
3.6K
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@Villgecrazylady Are you saying jd vance was lying when he said iran had nuclear suicide vests? 🤣
English
0
0
1
109
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
Yes. Propaganda is every bit as important as physical violence in wars of attrition. Why do you think Israel has a billion dollar propaganda budget? Why do you think Congress forced the sale of TikTok to Larry Ellison? Boomers saying propaganda doesn’t matter “in the real world” is absolutely hilarious considering they are by far the most propagandized generation to ever walk the earth.
Cal Was Here@PrepperLocal

@Villgecrazylady And you think that means something in the real world?

English
29
228
1.4K
21.9K
MSJ Bama
MSJ Bama@JonesvilleAL·
@MazeLove14 @xerias_x They are eating McDonald's and watching all of the crazy post about the pixel pictures laughing their ass off right now. And so m I just not eating McDonald's. Lol
English
1
0
0
20
Ryan Grim
Ryan Grim@ryangrim·
Nancy Mace gives Dems the votes to pass the War Powers resolution. Meeks said go talk to Republicans. Prem talked to Mace, I talked to Davidson. The votes are there. If Dems don’t put it on the floor now it’s because they don’t want it to pass now.
Zeteo@zeteo_news

Just as Democrat Gregory Meeks told Drop Site he would not put the War Powers Resolution to a vote because he didn't think it would win, Rep. Nancy Mace told @prem_thakker the case she makes for one. Mace's possible support could’ve been enough to help pass the resolution.

English
177
2.6K
12K
531.6K
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@DarioCpx Iran has already released its uae/saudi targets they will hit if the US attacks its infrastructure.
English
4
0
5
195
JustDario 🏊‍♂️
Not only things are bad, but they are worsening every day because the more storages fill up in the Middle East the more production and refinery will have to be shut down. With regards to damages, pray Saudi and UAE don’t decide to announce active participation in this conflict.
Financelot@FinanceLancelot

Global oil demand = 105M barrels per day ❌ Hormuz shutdown: -20M ❌ Refinery shutdowns: -8M ❌ Damaged refineries: -2M Every fix they’re throwing at it: ✅ SPR: +2M ✅ Saudi pipeline: +3M ✅ Oil on water: +2M Result: -23M bpd shock This is going to be worse than COVID.

English
18
52
375
31.9K
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@DarioCpx Uae said the would help with a ground invasion
English
4
0
3
148
Genxdoomer
Genxdoomer@genxdoomer·
@RudyHavenstein But ya "invading" iran is a death sentence. They may get in but they wont come out, alive anyway.
English
0
0
1
25
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator.
The U.S. has kicked a hornet's nest without popular support. We attacked Iran not in U.S. interests, but in the service of Israel. Iran's fighting on their own turf, in mountainous terrain, and have the same sort of end-times theology as Hegseth. This war is very bad for America.
English
58
109
1.1K
41.3K
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator.
“If you want to invade Iran, in the sense that you want to invade Iran and take Iran, depose the government, and transform it, you’re going to need the U.S. Army. And you’re going to need a bigger army. What I mean by that is you’re going to need the whole U.S. Army. You’re going to have to reactivate divisions that we have shut down in recent years. I don’t know how you’re going to do that without drafting people. I mean, you’re talking hundreds and hundreds of thousands of guys on the ground.” Sam Faddis
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator. tweet media
English
4
5
48
2.6K