JXT
135 posts


司法要改革 不能再等「某時地」
Judicial reform cannot wait for some vague “time and place”— it must happen here and now
I. Introduction
各位關心柯文哲的朋友、各位媒體記者,大家晚安:
Good evening to all friends caring about Ko Wen-je, and to members of the media:
「司法是國家的最後一道防線,司法應該被人民信任,司法唯一的目的是維持社會的公平正義,司法不可以是政治工具、更不可以是執政者打擊反對黨的工具。
“Judiciary is the last line of defense of a nation. It should be trusted by the people. Its sole purpose is to maintain fairness and justice in society. It must not be a political manipulation tool, nor should it be used by those in power to suppress opposition parties.
司法應當遵守程序正義,司法應該以證據為基礎來辦案,司法不可以用編故事的方法來定罪。」
The judiciary must follow due process. Cases must be handled based on evidence. It must not rely on fabricated narratives to convict.”
這是3月3日,我前往法務部檢察官評鑑委員會,申請評鑑本案檢察官時說的話。這個司法案件並不是在追求事實真相,而是在為一個早已寫好的政治劇本善後而已。
These were the words I spoke on March 3 when I went to the Prosecutor Evaluation Committee of the Ministry of Justice to file a request for evaluating the prosecutors in this case. This trial is not about pursuing facts and truth—it is merely about filling in the final chapters of a political script that was already written in advance.
在這場審判中,證據法則被拋棄、證詞被選擇性採信、程序正義蕩然無存。我們看到的,這不是一個法治國家的審判,而是一場政治操作下的司法表演。
In this trial, the rules of evidence have been abandoned, testimonies have been selectively accepted, and procedural justice has completely collapsed. What we are seeing is not a trial in a country governed by the rule of law, but a judicial performance under political manipulation.
這個案子過程中有太多的政治介入,台灣司法社會信任度本來就不高,誠如本案審判長說的,台灣司法很脆弱,我回應:「老百姓面對國家機器,其實更脆弱」。經過這個案子,台灣司法更脆弱,社會信任度更低了。
There has been far too much political interference throughout this case. Public trust in Taiwan’s judiciary has never been high. As the presiding judge in this case said, Taiwan’s judiciary is very fragile. My response is: “Ordinary people facing the state apparatus are even more fragile.” With this case, Taiwan’s judiciary has become even more fragile, and public trust has declined further.

日本語

@888_very75135 @whyyoutouzhele 我發現很多人真的都被民眾黨似是而非的講法混淆,「政治獻金」只要公開申報,並且沒超過上限就是合法,柯的問題是,他根本就沒申報這幾筆,而且金額都超過政治獻金上限,根本就不能稱之為「政治獻金」。
不然阿扁也說自己的七億是政治獻金不就好了?
中文

@whyyoutouzhele 在等判決書..跟之後審理法院影片放送
另外目前傳言,如果政治獻金捐款..真的也算貪汙
那接下來,只要類似京華城...事件,都是變相鼓勵有心人可以告了...
此外等判決書公開...如果沒有之前三立民視東森所講貪汙
1500..其他內容 那些人以後說話也沒人信了...也斷了一切了
因為網路都有紀錄
中文

@whyyoutouzhele 法院认为210万新台币的政治献金是几百亿京华城都更案的后谢,所以判贪污罪成13年徒刑。天底下有这种贪污方式?
中文

@6NK6PMSbvF35Wfp @cap456852 @woggcc1986 @Taiwan_Dreamer 一個有礦、土地是台灣三倍大、人口是台灣兩倍多又沒被中共打壓的國家,確實GDP成長率輸台灣也是只能無奈的笑啦
中文

@cap456852 @gg3be1 @woggcc1986 @Taiwan_Dreamer 你這篇文的重點只有最後一句而已
抹在野舔共 就能說支持民進黨無腦執政
抗中保臺抗到連韓國都在看笑話
天色漸漸亮
中文

@6NK6PMSbvF35Wfp @cap456852 @woggcc1986 @Taiwan_Dreamer 確實啊!看看人家日韓的服務業,用心做事、創造獨特價值,再看看臺灣服務業,大部分相似度極高、東西又只有平均水準,你跟我說這樣要高薪?
中文

@6NK6PMSbvF35Wfp @cap456852 @woggcc1986 @Taiwan_Dreamer 無核確實是有點問題不否認。
本來就沒有一個政治人物會100%跟自己立場相同,但至少我不會再投那個騎飛輪收300萬,然後滿嘴藍綠一樣爛,自己把政治獻金收入口袋,爛帳一堆的破人!
中文






















