
Girish Bharadwaj
32.3K posts

Girish Bharadwaj
@Girishvhp
Swayamsevak | ಕನ್ನಡಿಗ | Advocate | LLM-IPR | Ramana Maharshi | Tweets Personal, RT not Endorsement | [email protected]











U. T. Khader must clarify whether he is serving as the Speaker holding a constitutional office for only Muslim community or for all the people of Karnataka. How can the Home Department be urged to withdraw cases by branding certain accused as “innocent” merely based on religion? Innocence or guilt must be determined by law and evidence, not by religious identity or any other label. The charges against these so-called accused include the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and serious IPC sections such as 143, 147, 353, 307, 504, 427, 120B, among others. With such grave allegations on record, what compelled the Speaker to write such a letter?


















