glu🐢

@Adriana19Flower @LilaGraceRose @yesiwetmyplants @megbasham This

The smart married women on here are staying quiet about the husband who bragged about how his reformed harlot wife is purer than a virgin The foolish married harlots are letting everyone know that they slept around by defending this @LilaGraceRose @yesiwetmyplants @megbasham

@Adriana19Flower At this point, christians are some of the main allies of 'degeneracy' Bomb the churches. Don’t let any boy end up with them lol

@gl_4433 We are living in a Sodom and Gomorrah. You can see that woman has no shame, she’s bragging about how she got away with sleeping around and then finding a foolish husband that she humiliates by letting everyone know she doesn’t even know her body count 💀

Sometimes I’m scared about how right I am. Do not trust any married man that tells you a promiscuous woman can be more pure or equal to a virgin. These guys are telling on themselves, most won’t be as honest in humiliating themselves and their wife like this though.Embarrassing.

@trueonpurpose @Adriana19Flower Terrible guys she still can’t stop comparing to her husband, even after all these years and kids So gross and cynical

@gl_4433 @Adriana19Flower it's abominable

@trueonpurpose @Adriana19Flower Terrible guys she must’ve really liked to sleep with so many She says she doesn’t remember how many, but she does remember what they were like. Funny, right? Whether she remembers or not, it’s still messed up af

@RicosGhost100 They’re putting her in the same group as Nala and Stock lmao Going around telling everyone his wife’s a h0e is definitely not the smartest thing he’s ever done Then again, I doubt he’s ever had much common sense Some ppl are just really into publicly humiliating themselves

😂😂😂😂 u need her on the team

@RicosGhost100 @TrevorSheatz All that just to still have it stuck in his head years later to the point where he ends up sharing it with thousands of ppl online It’s honestly a pretty pathetic situation Perpetual self humiliation

@TrevorSheatz u wrote all this just to say that u was a fucking virgin loser that married a woman that u admit was whore but u couldn't even get a kiss out of her ? Yeah she fucked everybody and then settled with u, guys second chances r cool just don't be the sucker that get stuck with them

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

@RicosGhost100 @TrevorSheatz This When you put it all together, what you get is an unattractive 30 yo guy with zero experience with women who decides to commit to a wh0re, and on top of that, he’s fine with being put in chastity for a couple more years

@TrevorSheatz Your wife made you wait until marriage to have sex? What was she even saving, lmao? Plenty of guys had already been through there

@kenzietuff Christians don’t even need anyone else attacking their religion. They do a pretty good job of making themselves the butt of the joke

People log onto this app every single day and post personal things that you could not waterboard out of me.

@TrevorSheatz You can see why christians have that reputation for being cucks

@TrevorSheatz @Adriana19Flower

@ZoomerHistorian Someday you'll realize that the religion you follow is getting in the way of what you want

Every life lost is pointless. Eventually we are going to reach the inevitable conclusion that we can’t live alongside Africans and then do something to create distance between the civilised races and them. That decision is inevitable, it will come one day. Every day we delay the decision is a waste of time. Every life lost whilst we delay is a life wasted, a meaningless, avoidable death. These people have the IQ of a genuinely mentally retarded person on average. You literally cannot even comprehend them. They are savage. They do not think even remotely like you do. Our differences are irreconcilable. Segregation existed for a reason. Even Abraham Lincoln wanted to deport them for a reason.

Sócrates desde que salen del potorro de su madre pero a los 23 manipuladas emocionalmente por Alejandro Sanz

Con 17 años le dejan correrse dentro al yonki del pueblo pero desde los 9 son filósofas, sí

@skoldread @TomHicks2LCF Could be, actually And all this “defending wh0res” stuff is probably just his way of justifying that he married one

@TomHicks2LCF I bet my bottom dollar that your wife is not a former whore like the ones you’re begging men to marry.

A former adulteress who repented of her sins is a Christian. To deny that she is someone a godly man may faithfully marry is to deny the power of God in the gospel.

@TomHicks2LCF @Adriana19Flower They definitely never disappoint

@TomHicks2LCF Peak christcuck mindset

@tardwife4life @MoreBirths Exactly. Only a few groups actually choose to live outside society That’s not something you can just scale up

@gl_4433 @MoreBirths The few highly fertile groups maintaining a TFR of 4+ are doing just that despite their efforts being entirely outside the standards of western legal codes.

BRONZE AGE PERVERT ON THE FERTILITY CRISIS An article by Bronze Age Pervert titled "Fertility Cult" about the fertility crisis just went viral. The article sounds clever and BAP is a brilliant writer. Unfortunately, BAP gets almost everything wrong about fertility and doesn't seem very interested in what the data actually shows. BAP writes in his opening (see below), "Of all social and political problems the reestablishment of high fertility among a population where birth rate has already fallen below replacement is the most difficult. If there are any solutions, they’re obscure or even occult." BAP ignores the obvious The fertility crisis is clearly a difficult problem, but the solutions are anything but obscure. There are lots of groups that have above replacement fertility, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what matters. > People who marry have above replacement fertility, while people who don't marry are far below replacement. > Those who go to church every week have above replacement fertility while those who never attend have very low fertility. > People who live in suburban single-family homes in the US, Australia or the UK have replacement fertility. People living in urban high-rises have fertility far below replacement. > Those who start in their early twenties have above replacement fertility. Those who start in their mid 30s are far below it. > Republicans in the US are at replacement. Democrats are far below. The fertility difference between right and left-wing people is large. > Those who idealize a large family as a kid usually have a large family in the end and vice-versa. > When men have a higher income, they have more kids. For women, it's complicated. These aren't the only factors, but they are the big ones. The evidence for all of these factors is overwhelming. All over the world, people who marry, are religious, live at lower density, start earlier, are conservative and like the idea of having kids all tend to have a lot more. These factors stack up, and getting to higher fertility is simply a matter of having more of these factors work in your favor. The Amish have the highest fertility because they hit all the notes! What could be simpler? No single solution Pundits always seem to get stuck on fertility because the mind seeks a single solution. It is unsatisfying to think that the fertility crisis might have 5 or 10 different answers that each get you partway there. Ignoring the effect of religion BAP writes, "Modern pundits and influencers know that the solution is to reestablish both high fertility and religiosity at the same time. ... This is to write about turning back the clock on two phenomena that in human history appear nearly irreversible insisting that you do both at the same time, as the solution for each other." BAP is correct that religiosity is associated with higher fertility, but he is wrong to relegate it to the past. Many religious groups large and small have healthy fertility in the present age, and they seem to among the only ones resisting the modern trend of plunging fertility. Nor is it true that religiosity once lost is never regained. America alone had no less than three Great Awakenings in its history, and they are a big part of why America surged demographically while Europe stagnated. Then BAP writes, "the current pitch of the religious conservative natalists is something like, “You should have children. —Why? To save civilization of course. Do it for others. But to do this you need to have religion. —What is the connection? —Because we have sociological correlation studies that tell us that women who have children and are married tend to be religious. So it’s that you can find religion— Why should I be religious? —Because we have studies that show religious people tend to have higher fertility and marriage rates. That could be you." He dismisses the whole religion-fertility nexus as circular, but it isn't circular. There are clear lines of causality. Religious groups have higher fertility because - They link sex with marriage and family in a way that society does not. - They offer dating networks of higher trust and common values. - They literally believe we are called to go forth and have children. - They offer people identity and belonging in a world of anomie. - Religiosity is associated with greater happiness and happy people are more likely to have children. Religion is an enormous cultural driver of fertility, and religious cultures may have been selected in cultural evolution for precisely for that reason. Those groups that got their adherents to have children are with us today while others like the Shakers that didn't have died out. That cultural evolution continues to this today, and those groups that lack religion are being outcompeted by those that do. This is a really big deal, but BAP has long had a bias against religion, and so he is unwilling to see it clearly. Ignoring marriage BAP writes, "A stronger but similarly fruitless argument exists about reestablishing traditional family forms in some way. Essentially this means subjugating or enslaving women, though no one dares to speak this way." This is an absurdly false dichotomy. The primary traditional family form of course is marriage, and usually only rabid feminists would claim it is slavery. It is weird for a supposed right-winger to speak like this. BAP adds, "I don’t think marriage is the cause of fertility: this is a social engineering wish and its factual basis is only a correlation." He offers no evidence of this view, and actually causal connection between marriage and fertility are easy to establish. Millions of people move in and out of marriage every year and fertility is multiples higher while people are in it. In certain conservative societies, marriage is virtually a requirement for having children but even in the most liberal societies, fertility is far higher in marriage. BAP concedes that married white women have a TFR of 2.6 to 2.7. That is a pretty powerful signal in a world of fertility collapse, and more than twice the figure for unmarried women, but saying that marriage is good just isn't very edgy. So, he goes on to make a bunch of handwaving arguments absent actual data claiming high marital fertility is actually low ("I haven’t studied it closely"). But again, we do have the data and for every culture and demographic, fertility is high for the years when people are married. BAP's winding arguments disbelieving the link between marriage and fertility show a special kind of laziness because the data there so abundant. We have marital status and fertility in the gigantic American Community Survey for example. Status and fertility Next BAP dismisses motherhood status, even though it is yet another helpful driver of fertility. He writes, ""promoting fertility" is based on rhetoric about the "dignity of motherhood" and honoring mothers. Modern day natalism in general centers on images of respected women as wives, on motherhood as moral and honorable." He adds, as always without any evidence, "It’s completely useless for actually inspiring women to have babies in a modern situation." But countries that celebrate motherhood, like Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Georgia, do have higher fertility. And all the high-fertility faith groups place high value on motherhood. But BAP ignores the big honking example of celebrating motherhood that is right before our eyes. Republican leaders and influencers in the US venerate motherhood with all the schmaltz they can muster while Democrats are too cool for that, and Republican fertility in the US is now almost twice what it is for Democrats. It turns out that promoting fertility with rhetoric does have an effect, especially for the people on your own team. Sex cults to save the world!? Finally, BAP offers his solution: sex-cults! "What arrived in other places merely as sexual-carousing-drunken wine orgy and frenzy was reborn through the Greeks as timeless myth and poetry: the transfiguration of the satyr into Dionysos, the mirror of the local Apollo cults. This all developed into a vivid mythology and religion addressing suffering, rebirth and the nature of man and the universe. But the underlying phenomenon of sexual license and frenzy was never abandoned, merely sacralized." At least this fits with the BAP m.o., but what does the evidence say? Things like high partner counts, sexual liberation and polyamory are all associated with lower, not higher fertility. He writes, "Quite aside from any other artistic or spiritual consideration, from purely the point of view of survival, it’s not surprising Greek cities, beset so often by the problem of low citizen population, would fixate on this...one such craze every year or two could very well result in a bountiful harvest of venerated pregnancies." Except that we live in an age of birth control. People these days hardly ever get pregnant in "sexual-carousing-drunken wine orgy and frenzy." Aella is still childless and unplanned pregnancies are rarer than ever. Natalism isn't edgy enough Bronze Age Pervert, widely acknowledged to be Costin Alamariu, is (according to Grok) 45, unmarried and childless. He was never going to be a great candidate to reveal what is happening with fertility. But mostly he won't tell us what is happening with fertility because it's kind of boring and doesn't make for an edgy story. Marriage, churchgoing and suburban living, starting early, having conservative values, celebrating babies, and jobs for men -- these are the biggest keys. Does that vanilla answer fit with BAP content? Of course not. The guy recently wrote, "Enemy of God, of pity and of mercy -- let this be your motto." And therein lies the real problem with pronatalism. The things that work aren't hip at all. In fact, they are so painfully uncool that pop influencers don't want to touch them. TLDR: We know the factors that can cause more babies and avert the crisis! But they are all really boring. Does anyone know how to sell pronatalism? Please share! And follow @morebirths for more on the global fertility crisis and its solution.

@tardwife4life @MoreBirths Yeah, the thing is, those “patriarchal groups” are a thing of the past, and there’s no way to replicate those conditions on a large scale today So you just have to work with what’s available and keep your expectations and ideas realistic I think you’d agree with that

You have addressed some of his ancillary points, but what about his central premise that fertility is born out of elevation of the masculine rather than supplication to the feminine. Without addressing this, what is the point of your critique? The examples of successful groups you've given are limp. The highly patriarchal, male dominated groups of the past achieved TFRs of 6-9. "Above replacement" rates of 2.2 are not a significant achievement.

@DarkMatter599 @hayasaka_aryan There’s always an idiot ready haha Some ppl just gotta learn the hard way

@gl_4433 @hayasaka_aryan Yeah I told her husband,they got divorced and she got mad at me and didn’t talk to me for awhile. She then got a 2nd husband though lol

Women hate Clavicular cause he exposes them and they can’t call him incel because he looks like Patrick Bateman