Faison

4.4K posts

Faison banner
Faison

Faison

@glenn_faison

Full-stack JavaScript developer. GitHub: https://t.co/YtUd2wceIW LinkedIn: https://t.co/vunwK2KTOA #nodejs #javascript #programming

Katılım Eylül 2015
522 Takip Edilen341 Takipçiler
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@motsdemaelys Do you mean the stories turn out to be problematic, or that you go on to research the author to inform yourself on whether or not you like the story they wrote?
English
0
0
0
800
ᥫ𝒎𝒆𝒍᭡
ᥫ𝒎𝒆𝒍᭡@motsdemaelys·
honestly i'm this close to quitting reading for good. every single author i actually love turns out to be problematic or worse. i'm so tired of finding out after i already got attached. feels like i can't enjoy anything anymore without a background check first
English
1.1K
96
2.9K
9.2M
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@rinua_22 Huh? Boruto: the unwanted gift that keeps borrowing
English
0
0
0
248
Naila ❤︎⁠
Naila ❤︎⁠@rinua_22·
sometimes I forget tenten and rock Lee are canonically divorced like ??? what’s the tea
Naila ❤︎⁠ tweet media
English
168
849
43.9K
4.6M
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@YOLO_AEMCS When you buy garri, fry it to dry and store in small, airtight containers like ziplocs
English
0
0
0
10
YoLs
YoLs@YOLO_AEMCS·
imagine having a long day, planning your garri to end your day. just to pour into a bowl and the fat head has caught mold. wtf is this shite
English
4
0
1
233
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@Ayang_elly I am not oh. I dunno what gave me the impression you were a United fan instead. I am always interested in the "origin stories" of Arsenal fans
English
0
0
0
6
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@astrasdoctor So in summary, wait for NASA to do the vetting process first, then pick from the chosen few? 😅
English
0
0
0
1.5K
project hail dado ⚢
project hail dado ⚢@astrasdoctor·
sometimes i wonder why astronauts are all so charming and funny then i realise they literally go through psychological and psychiatric selection processes to ensure that they’re not a pain in the ass to be around 😭😭😭
English
128
8.8K
238.7K
1.8M
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@MHasia21812 There is a chance, but it's unlikely. This team with Mbappé out of contention is a different beast
English
0
0
0
21
Miss Hassy
Miss Hassy@MissHassy1·
What if we didn’t sign mbappe would we have gone trophyless back to back . I’m just curious
English
68
17
263
10.1K
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@kareem_carr False dichotomy of "be rational, or be irrational". Mostly rooted in the lack of theory of mind, IMO
English
0
0
1
45
Dr Kareem Carr
Dr Kareem Carr@kareem_carr·
These kinds of problems are bad because they falsely convince a lot of people that math requires them to be an asshole. Basically, the math ends up blinding them to all the moral assumptions being made.
English
14
1
133
6K
Dr Kareem Carr
Dr Kareem Carr@kareem_carr·
If you press blue, the worst case is you die. If you press red, the worst case is you took part in an action that killed just under half of humanity. Clicking blue minimizes the worst-case moral injury. It says you’d rather die than risk contributing to the death of another.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
535
68
1.3K
87.3K
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
I am convinced that if you think there's exactly one correct choice here, you lack theory of mind. To be explicit, there is no single "win condition" here, and each participant's aim will inform what the "correct" choice is
Faison tweet media
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
0
0
0
26
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@jack_whitcomb_ Your assumption is that "I want to survive" the goal for everybody. There are perfectly rational thought processes behind picking blue. For example, people who are aware that the above assumption is a bad one will pick blue if their goal is "majority survives"
English
1
0
0
175
Jack Whitcomb
Jack Whitcomb@jack_whitcomb_·
I'm convinced this is just a poorly phrased question. If you pose it as: - Anyone who presses the red button lives no matter what. - Anyone who presses the blue button dies, unless > 50% of people also press the blue button. then it's clear that pressing the blue button is dumb.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
318
36
1.8K
126.9K
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@shadcn I suspect if you set cursor: pointer on buttons by default, less than 1% of devs would override it
English
0
0
0
28
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@recmo @waitbutwhy People will choose blue for varying reasons, and people will also choose red for varying reasons The button pressers have various goals. Some want to survive, some hope everyone survives, some want to kill blue pressers, some hope to die, etc The "rational" choice is not fixed
English
1
0
5
603
Remco
Remco@recmo·
@waitbutwhy Who wants to live in a world populated only by red button pressers?
English
242
135
12K
420.8K
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
5.8K
1.5K
14.3K
26.7M
midGRAY
midGRAY@_midGRAY·
@JustinBonomo @waitbutwhy Well I’d say that is a skewed and leading framing because you’re associating live with red and death with blue.
English
11
0
110
8.7K
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@theEconBlog @peterrhague The assumption that all humans will act rational is wrong. Also, the assumption that those acting rationally will have the same goal, is wrong.
English
0
0
0
52
econoBlogger
econoBlogger@theEconBlog·
@peterrhague Game theory assumes all agents are rational and have full understanding of the situation. Theres no real stakes for an online poll, make it real and the results will change.
English
64
3
1.1K
47.6K
Peter Hague
Peter Hague@peterrhague·
Amazing how lots of self appointed game theory experts confidently asserting that blue is the stupid choice. But every time this poll is run blue wins. Not only is the “game theory” answer predicting the wrong outcome, its explanatory power is based on it being able to predict the right answer. So it’s doubly wrong.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
1.2K
193
4.3K
841.1K
Faison
Faison@glenn_faison·
@nyama_rene Yup. Apparently her songs in Duala were mostly written by Tom Yom's
English
0
1
3
181