Free Willy 💏💏

2.6K posts

Free Willy 💏💏 banner
Free Willy 💏💏

Free Willy 💏💏

@gnashgnashing

Oh- that's not... I did not give my consent for you to read my bio, actually. Hope this helps!

Katılım Temmuz 2022
435 Takip Edilen25 Takipçiler
Cavalier of Hyperborea
Cavalier of Hyperborea@ThuleanCavalier·
@gnashgnashing @CHRISF0GLE are you aware of the meaning of infallible? Cause this does not logically continue or conclude from anything I've said. People can just... Not talk about something, perhaps?
English
1
0
0
5
Free Willy 💏💏
Free Willy 💏💏@gnashgnashing·
@ThuleanCavalier @CHRISF0GLE How is it simultaneously true that Jesus does not abolish any part of the old testament laws and that Jesus does abolish some parts of the old testament laws?
English
1
0
0
5
Mark Ruffalo
Mark Ruffalo@kevingatesfan09·
@ReuelWilliams3 its cognitive dissonance akin to every other form of unethical consumption, i don't think that entirely correlates to supporting the holocaust man
English
3
0
24
1.8K
Free Willy 💏💏
Free Willy 💏💏@gnashgnashing·
@An0n1991 @brndxix @FF_Tycoon Even if cows, pigs, and chickens couldn't do any of those things, your argument would still be very bad. What do you mean by "largely and historically" if you're ignoring that many of the most populous countries currently eat dogs, cats, and horses, and did throughout history?
English
1
0
0
19
Kenneth Eduard
Kenneth Eduard@An0n1991·
@gnashgnashing @brndxix @FF_Tycoon A dog will defend me and my property. A cat will keep small pests at bay. A horse will plow my field and pull my cart. That’s why we didn’t eat them, largely and historically speaking. It’s an entirely different exchange between species.
English
1
0
0
27
serenity404
serenity404@serenityerror·
@gnashgnashing @brndxix @FF_Tycoon They are on the higher side of the low end. But they also lack empathy, unlike dogs (which they are freq compared to) Pigs will straight up eat you and your kids. Cats and dogs will just want pets, and will oftentimes be protective of kids. I think morality needs reciprocation
English
1
0
0
7
Diamondback
Diamondback@diamondback_xx·
@sibaburck Only for humans, since animals are not people your claim does not qualify.
English
2
0
0
137
serenity404
serenity404@serenityerror·
@brndxix @FF_Tycoon Its not arbitrary. The animals we eat are BY FAR the least emotionally intelligent, the least self aware, and dont have other roles such as being a pet.
English
1
0
0
34
Kenneth Eduard
Kenneth Eduard@An0n1991·
@brndxix @FF_Tycoon It’s not arbitrary at all, and it makes perfect sense. All the animals listed as “food” have no symbiotic benefits. The animals listed as “not food” are animals we developed symbiotic and mutually beneficial existences with.
English
1
0
0
39
Free Willy 💏💏
Free Willy 💏💏@gnashgnashing·
@Three_of_Threes @CHRISF0GLE The distinction between "moral law" and "ceremonial law" is not made anywhere in the Bible and was entirely invented by Thomas Aquinas. The New Testament says multiple times to practice the full law and not to leave any part out, including the Old Testament.
English
1
0
0
11
Free Willy 💏💏
Free Willy 💏💏@gnashgnashing·
@Gorp_Shit @HalexiceAgain @UnSyndicatum @beanbuned @ShadeYuki If this were the case, then Leviticus 20:13 would demand the killing of male children who were raped. Leviticus 18:22 is surrounded by verses about incest and bestiality, and none of them forbid intercourse with children. There are plenty of Bible verses allowing child brides.
English
1
0
1
106
Free Willy 💏💏
Free Willy 💏💏@gnashgnashing·
@AzraelXOXOX @ekkonus The original Hebrew text has a term that, as it is used throughout the Bible, almost always refers to an adult male or one of any age. Leviticus 20:13 demands the death penalty for both parties. If it were describing child abuse, why kill the victim?
English
2
1
8
1.5K
Ms.Minute
Ms.Minute@NeryaFrey·
@The_GM_is_God Best trick ever, make them believe you don’t exist, and they ever find you, make them believe you are just like them, trying to do good, a victim of a bad story, and only show them who you are when is already too late
English
3
0
2
466
Bruhquatch
Bruhquatch@Bruhquatch·
@gnashgnashing @morallawwithin Especially if something else already takes care of those nutritional needs (like tempura and soy having more protein than oats and different nuts for example. Or backyard raised eggs)
English
1
0
0
19
Bruhquatch
Bruhquatch@Bruhquatch·
@gnashgnashing @morallawwithin Not eating unnecessary items is also a choice. I am only calling out the hypocrisy of this individual and people like him And i am aware that the right image is true for both livestock and vegan products. Though I am not making a moral statement over which diet is better
English
1
0
0
17