@ReasonTheology Also, Ezekiel 29:17-21 makes it clear that Nebuchadnezzar did not conquer the Island city of Tyre or take any plunder from it and as compensation he was going to conquer Egypt. (See, "Who destroyed the Temples and Idols of Egypt."
If you read the entire prophecy, you will see that it speaks of waves of invaders over a span of time. It very specifically mentions Nebuchadnezzer would destroy the coastal city of Tyre. The "He" Nebuchadnezzar would conquer the coastal city of Tyre. The "They," waves of invaders in the future would take the spoil of Tyre. A common mistake by scholars.
February 3rd, 585 B.C. Ezekiel predicted the coastal city of Tyre would be destroyed and one day its stones would be thrown into the sea. Alexander the Great fulfilled that prophecy 253 years later. EZEKIEL'S PROPHECY, at ancientisrael.net
February 3rd 585 B.C. Ezekiel predicted the coastal city of Tyre would be destroyed and one day its stones would be thrown into the sea. Alexander the Great fulfilled that prophecy 253 years later. EZEKIEL'S PROPHECY, at ancientisrael.net