GoIndiaStocks.com

Based on Nirmal Bang channel check at Crawford Market and Abdul Rehman Street, Mumbai & note on the sector — April 2026 India's Stationery Sector Is Quietly Undergoing a Structural Shift — and the Winners Are Already Visible on the Shelf The unorganised market is retreating, and it's not coming back. Ground-level checks confirm the unorganised segment has fallen below 20% in writing instruments — a structural shift driven by GST formalisation that permanently eroded the tax arbitrage small players relied on. Chinese imports, often cited as an existential threat, simply aren't showing up in writing instruments in any meaningful way. The consolidation is real and ongoing, and the share being vacated is going straight to organised incumbents. DOMS is the standout performer on the ground, but here's the interesting part — the constraint isn't demand, it's supply. Wholesalers are reporting 20–30% annual growth consistently across categories, with kits and combos, geometry boxes, and pencils leading. The company holds ~30% market share in pencils and dominates art stationery shelf space. More tellingly, there's no channel filling or extended credit to wholesalers — which is the clearest sign that this is genuine consumer pull, not inventory-loading dressed up as growth. The gaps: DOMS hasn't cracked North India in pens yet, and school bags — while growing — need dedicated retail infrastructure rather than sharing shelf space with stationery. Flair's real moat isn't its product, it's its distribution. Commanding over 50% of wholesale display shelf space in surveyed outlets and leading the high-volume ₹10 pen segment with ~15-day inventory turns, Flair's presence is earned rather than purchased. Superstockists in West Bengal and Telangana report ~30% market share and 15–18% growth — nearly double the industry average of 8–10%. A network of 300–400 distributors per region, ~4,000 retailers per superstockist, and 30–45 day credit terms is genuinely hard to replicate quickly. -Worth watching: the art materials segment is growing 80–90%, admittedly off a small base, but the trajectory suggests Flair is doing more than defending its pen turf. Linc is a solid regional story with meaningful distribution white space still to unlock. It dominates North & East India with ~30% market share, and its distributor relationships are genuinely strong — so strong that dealers are increasingly moving to advance payments despite no company credit being offered. Core SKUs Pentonic and Starline together account for ~50–55% of distributor revenues in surveyed regions. The honest limitation: western India presence is underdeveloped, and wholesale visibility in Mumbai is subdued relative to what the brand deserves. The Uni-ball partnership and Twistick crayons point to a premiumisation strategy, but near-term, this is still a North/East story waiting to go national. Kokuyo Camlin has a real moat in professional art, but it's losing the volume game. The #1 position in premium art materials is defensible — professional users are sticky, and brand preference is harder to dislodge at that end of the market. The problem is that volume growth in stationery is happening at the mass school end, and that's precisely where DOMS's ₹199 kits (offering ~₹275 worth of value by peer comparison) and child-centric packaging are winning decisively. Hindustan Pencils is facing a similar squeeze. The premium art moat holds; the mass school segment does not. The sector-level picture is straightforward: channel economics are healthy (retailers earn ~30%, distributors ~8%, superstockists ~5%), formalisation is structural not cyclical, and the pen market remains fragmented with mid-tier regional players — Cello World (~₹3,500mn), Winn (~₹2,000mn), Alcos (~₹1,500mn) — yet to be consolidated. That fragmentation is the next growth opportunity. The real competitive battle ahead isn't DOMS vs Flair vs Linc — it's all three of them absorbing the regional mid-tier together. #investing #stockmarket #pen #book ------------------------------------------------ Informational only. Not investment advice. Investments subject to market risk. | GoIndia Advisors LLP | SEBI Registered Research Analyst | Reg. No. INH000020040 | SEBI (RA) Regulations, 2014. For Serious Investors → goindiastocks.com Follow us for more insights.

@InRrajesh @varunjain2010 ha ha

@goindiastocks @varunjain2010 When this company gathers enough courage to write an open letter to to POTUS, then will I go through this letter? 🤔🤔🤔

Bernstein just wrote an open letter to India's Prime Minister — and it is asking some hard questions. (23rd April India Strategy note) 👇 1/ The employment question is existential, not cyclical - India's 10–15 million strong IT/BPO workforce — the backbone of the aspirational middle class — is directly in Gen AI's crosshairs. Manufacturing can't absorb the slack at current trajectory. The real question: does the next growth leg create engineers and product builders, or mostly drivers and delivery staff? 2/ Agriculture is stuck in a 1970s policy loop 42–45% of the workforce. 15–16% of GDP. - Below 1-hectare average holdings. Monsoon-dependent farming. Loan waivers instead of reform. The farm laws rollback made things harder, not less necessary. Rs 3–4 trillion in annual input subsidies need to shift toward post-procurement income transfers — and cold storage/logistics investment is not optional anymore. 3/ India risks becoming a permanent AI consumer, not a creator - Data centers are not a strategy. India doesn't own a single frontier AI model. If Indian data keeps training US and Chinese models while domestic capability goes unbuilt, the IT services sector hollows out with nothing to replace it. Bernstein's ask: fund domestic foundation models, build compute capacity, and push global AI companies to list in India — sharing value with the public. 4/ Manufacturing ambition keeps outrunning manufacturing depth - PLI created momentum, but the share of manufacturing in GDP is still stuck at 16–17%. Even in EVs, battery cells — 30–40% of cost — are largely imported from China. The pattern of late entry into industries after global supply chains are already formed needs to break. The next bet must be placed before the race is lost — automation, robotics, advanced materials, AI-integrated manufacturing. 5/ Cash transfer schemes are quietly crowding out capex - Women-only cash transfers across a dozen-plus states now total Rs 1.7–2.5 trillion annually — roughly 0.5% of GDP — and rising. In some states, these schemes absorb 2–3% of GSDP, squeezing infrastructure budgets. Bernstein isn't saying scrap them — targeted support has a role. But election-synchronised, unconditional, permanent transfers risk locking India into a low-productivity equilibrium where taxes fund today's consumption instead of tomorrow's capabilities. 6/ R&D spend of 0.6–0.7% of GDP is not a serious number for a country with semiconductor ambitions Merit-diluting reservation policies are hollowing out research institutions. Without fixing the talent pipeline and funding base, aspirations in AI, deep tech and semiconductors remain exactly that — aspirations. Bernstein's closing line: "India does not lack capital, talent, or ambition. What it requires now is a sharper willingness to take difficult decisions early, rather than defer them. The window to act is still open, but it is narrowing." #nifty #india #stockmarket #investing -------------------------------- Informational only. Not investment advice. Investments subject to market risk. | GoIndia Advisors LLP | SEBI Registered Research Analyst | Reg. No. INH000020040 | SEBI (RA) Regulations, 2014. For Serious Investors → goindiastocks.com Follow us for more insights.

The US Didn't Tariff Vikram Solar. The Market Did. The US 249% combined duty wall (123% ADD + 126% CVD) on Indian solar exports has triggered a sector-wide sell-off. The market is treating this as a blanket Indian solar shock. It isn't. Here's the case for Vikram specifically: The duty is origin-determined by the cell, not the module assembly location. US Customs rules trigger the 249% wall only on modules made from Indian-origin cells. Indian manufacturers sourcing cells from non-tariff jurisdictions can continue exporting panels to the US without attracting the duty. This is a well-established mechanic that the headlines are missing — and the CMD confirmed on-record last month that Vikram's US revenue is insignificant in current year." The cell hedge is African — and it's underpriced. While most Indian exporters have tied up cells sourcing from Southeast Asian jurisdictions exempted by the US, Vikram has built sourcing relationships in African supply partners. This is a differentiated route: not on any current US duty list, unlikely to be added near-term, and lower geopolitical concentration risk than Southeast Asia, where Chinese-owned facilities face their own US scrutiny. It gives Vikram clean legal access to the US market whenever it chooses to enter, with modules classified as African-origin and outside the duty wall. The domestic book (84% of order book) sits in front of three converging policy tailwinds. DGTR's anti-dumping recommendation on Chinese solar cells prices out imports that currently undercut domestic producers. MNRE's ALMM-3 framework mandates domestic wafer listing by June 2028, forcing onshore backward integration — Vikram's 12 GW Gangaikondan cell capacity addition is directly aligned. GST cut to 5% on renewable equipment improves project IRRs, flowing back into module demand from IPPs (55% of order book), C&I (21%), and distribution (13%). The AI data centre tailwind is not yet in any base case - India's 500 GW renewable target does not incorporate AI data centre deployment — meaning the demand curve is materially under-calibrated to what's actually coming. Hyperscalers building data centres in India will need dedicated renewable capacity for green power commitments. For a domestic module manufacturer with 10-12% current market share, 9.5 GW installed capacity, and backward integration underway, this is a structurally under-appreciated demand pool. The financials don't need the US market. 9MFY26 revenue increased 50% to ₹3349 crore; 9MFY26 PAT up 631% to ₹360 crore. 9MFY26 EBITDA margin 20%, vs 9MFY25 EBITDA margin at 12%, capacity utilisation 90%. Net debt of ₹231 crore against a ~₹8,051 crore market cap (D/E of 0.08x) means the company is self-funding its backward integration. BESS is free optionality. A 5 GWh facility planned by FY27, scaling to 15 GWh over five years, targets a domestic market expected to grow from 0.55 GWh in FY26 to 321 GWh by FY35 — roughly 60x growth. At current valuations, the market is paying essentially nothing for this. Even half-successful execution meaningfully expands the addressable market into higher-margin, stickier revenue. At current levels, Vikram Solar is not a US export trade. It is a domestic-policy-tailwind trade with BESS optionality and wafer-origin-hedged future export optionality, trading at a compressed multiple because of sector-wide sentiment contagion — not company-specific fundamental deterioration. The stock is down ~48% YTD. Honest risks to size for: cell plant stabilisation delayed to FY28, and wafer-origin rules that could shift in 12-24 months if the US moves the origin test from wafer to polysilicon. #vikramsolar #solar #investing ---------------------- Disclosure - Vikram Solar Limited is our IR Client. Informational only. Not investment advice. Investments subject to market risk. | GoIndia Advisors LLP | SEBI Registered Research Analyst | Reg. No. INH000020040 | SEBI (RA) Regulations, 2014. For Serious Investors → goindiastocks.com Follow us for more insights.

HSBC & JPMorgan Downgrade India - Two Banks, One Call, Three Holes in the Thesis HSBC Global Investment Research (23 Apr 2026), J.P. Morgan Equity Research (24 Apr 2026) ## The Setup Two Tier-1 global banks have converged on the same India call in the same week. HSBC double-downgraded India to **Underweight** (from Neutral) within 2 months to fund a Korea upgrade. JPMorgan cut India to **Neutral** from Overweight, slashing its Nifty 50 targets. When two houses of this standing align directionally within 24 hours, it shapes FII positioning near-term — regardless of whether the underlying thesis is complete. The directional signal deserves respect. The completeness deserves scrutiny. Below is every major pillar of the bear thesis, paired with the counterpoint that complicates it. ## 1. The Oil-Driven Inflation Shock **Point (HSBC & JPMorgan):** India's reliance on imported energy makes it the most vulnerable large EM to sustained high crude. With the Middle East conflict keeping oil elevated through 2Q–3Q26, HSBC economists expect retail petrol and diesel prices to be revised higher once state elections conclude in early May. A renewed inflation rise would undermine the demand recovery, push up lending-sector NPLs, and — historically — a 20% crude rise has compressed earnings by roughly 1.5ppt. **Counterpoint:** The post-election fuel price hike that anchors the entire inflation bear case may simply not materialise at the scale being modelled. Export duties have already been raised sharply — ₹42/litre on ATF and ₹55.5/litre on diesel — more than offsetting the ₹10/litre excise cut on domestic petrol and diesel. At current oil prices, the government remains net revenue positive by ₹500–700 billion annualised, giving it meaningful fiscal room to absorb OMC under-recoveries without forcing pump prices higher. Even with partial revision, a ~25% pass-through would add ~120bps to headline CPI — a number politically and monetarily impossible to accept mid-RBI-rate-cut-cycle. The probability-weighted shock global banks are modelling is overstated; if it doesn't materialise, the central pillar of their earnings downgrade thesis falls with it. ## 2. The Earnings Downgrade **Point (JPMorgan):** CY26E/27E MSCI India EPS growth cut by 2%/1% to 11%/13%. HSBC expects consensus forecasts to be revised down sharply from the current 16% y-o-y expectation for FY27. Without the anticipated cyclical acceleration in growth, valuations will appear elevated again as earnings cuts feed through. **Counterpoint:** Expectations have now been reset to a level that is genuinely achievable — which inverts the risk-reward. At 11% EPS growth, India doesn't need an acceleration in consumption, a credit upcycle, or a capex boom — it needs things to be merely okay. Private banks growing book value steadily, pharma delivering on US generics, capital goods executing order books, and IT stabilising — all visible and underway — gets you to 11% without any positive surprise. Brokers cutting first and asking questions later has historically been one of the better contrarian signals in Indian equities. ## 3. The Valuation Premium **Point (JPMorgan & HSBC):** India trades at a ~65% premium to MSCI EM — compressed from a 109% peak, but still elevated versus peers offering comparable or better forward growth at lower multiples. China is much cheaper with great innovation; Brazil offers commodity and financial exposure at deep value; Korea's FTSE earnings are expected to triple in 2026. HSBC says valuations have fallen from their peak, but will rise again as earnings cuts come through. India looks less attractive than its North East Asian peers. **Counterpoint:** This is the argument that genuinely sticks — and the contra view cannot fully dismiss it. India at a 65% premium still requires a meaningful growth and quality premium to justify, and that is difficult to sustain at 11% EPS growth when peers offer similar or better numbers cheaper. The honest framing: India doesn't need to be the best EM — it needs to be good enough at a price that makes the risk-reward work. At a 27,000 Nifty base case with earnings reset to moderate levels, that threshold is getting closer. Once the earnings reset fully feeds through and the FII overhang clears, the premium compression argument weakens mechanically. ## 4. The FII Exodus and INR Pressure **Point (HSBC):** Foreign investor sentiment remains cautious. Sharp INR depreciation has weighed on dollar returns, and HSBC's FX strategist sees the INR exposed to further depreciation pressure if oil stays high. Together with AI-implication concerns for Indian software services, these factors are likely to constrain foreign inflows. **Counterpoint:** FII selling may be substantially closer to exhaustion than the headline number suggests. A record ~$37 billion of FPI outflows over 18 months is extraordinary by any historical measure — comparable in scale to the 2008 and 2013 stress episodes. At this point, the investors most negatively disposed toward India have largely acted. What remains in the FII base is structurally stickier capital: long-only EM mandates with India as benchmark weight, sovereign wealth funds, and passive index money that doesn't leave on macro calls. The marginal FII seller today is qualitatively different from 12 months ago — which means incremental selling pressure is likely slower and smaller than the trailing pace implies. ## 5. The $64 Billion Supply Pipeline **Point (JPMorgan):** A $64 billion pipeline of IPOs, QIPs, and promoter sales will cap index upside even as domestic SIP flows are absorbed. HSBC notes new issuances are set to pick up after a seasonally weak H1, and a pick-up in IPO activity warrants a return of foreign demand. **Counterpoint:** The supply pipeline is real and structurally important — but the demand side is structurally stronger than global models capture. Monthly SIP inflows have been running consistently above ₹25,000 crore, representing a structural and largely price-insensitive source of equity demand that simply did not exist at this scale in prior FII selloff episodes of 2008, 2013, or 2018. Indian households have fundamentally altered their savings behaviour — money that previously went into fixed deposits and gold is now systematically entering equities every month through auto-debit SIP mandates regardless of market levels. This creates a durable floor under the market. A stabilisation or modest reversal in FII flows — which historically follows extreme outflow episodes — combined with the ongoing SIP bid could be the dual catalyst that bridges reset earnings and index recovery. ## 6. The AI and Technology Representation Gap **Point (JPMorgan):** India's large-cap index has minimal AI, data centre, and semiconductor exposure compared to the US, Korea, China, and Taiwan. Korea's FTSE earnings are expected to triple in 2026 led by Samsung and SK Hynix on AI infrastructure demand. Indian IT services face AI-implication overhang. Limited exposure to next-generation technologies is an explicit reason cited for the downgrade. **Counterpoint:** This is the second point that genuinely sticks — and it's not just a relative return argument, it's a statement about where the global equity bid is concentrated for the next 3–5 years. The contra view cannot dismiss it. What it can do is reframe it: India's underweight to AI hardware means it's also under-exposed to the AI capex cycle unwind whenever it comes, and India's financial deepening, consumption, and capex themes are largely uncorrelated to the semiconductor cycle. For a globally diversified portfolio, India serves a different role than Korea — not a substitute. The downgrade makes sense for a GEM PM rotating between Asia markets; it makes less sense as a verdict on India's standalone medium-term return profile. ## 7. Relative vs. Absolute Call **Point (HSBC):** The downgrade is framed explicitly as a funding source for a Korea upgrade. HSBC upgraded Korea to Neutral (from Underweight) on cleared crowded positioning, supportive domestic flows under the Lee administration's pro-equity agenda, and an earnings outlook that could see FTSE Korea earnings triple in 2026. India was funded out of that call. **Counterpoint:** This is the most important framing disclosure in the entire note — and it changes how a domestic investor should interpret the signal. The global bank downgrades are portfolio allocation tools for GEM fund managers rotating between Korea, China, Brazil, and India. They are not verdicts for investors with rupee-denominated long horizons. HSBC is saying "Korea is more attractive right now" — it is not saying "sell India." For a domestic investor with a 3–5 year horizon, the actionable signal is sectoral, not market-level capitulation. ## The Practical Framework Three of the five bearish conditions are already in the process of resolving: earnings have been cut to an achievable level, the FII exodus is maturing, and the fuel price shock may be smaller than feared. The two points that stick — the AI gap and the valuation premium — are structural arguments that justify a reduced premium, not an exit. The actionable signal for domestic investors is selective accumulation in the right sectors: **Lean away from** oil-sensitive consumer staples, paints, aviation, and logistics through Q1–Q2 FY27, where earnings risk is most concentrated. **Lean into** private banks benefiting from the RBI rate cut cycle with zero crude exposure; select pharma with US generics providing a natural INR-depreciation hedge; and capital goods riding the PLI and infrastructure capex cycle that is insulated from oil. Utilities, Power and Renewable energy sectors (stocks have already getting re-rated here) JPMorgan's own note contains the implicit entry signal — it says it will revisit when valuations de-rate further or earnings visibility improves. The setup is compressed near-term upside with improving medium-term risk-reward — which, for a patient domestic investor, is usually when the right sectors are worth owning. *Disclaimer: This is an analytical framing of published broker research for informational purposes only. #india #investing #stockmarket #nifty --------------------------- Informational only. Not investment advice. Investments subject to market risk. | GoIndia Advisors LLP | SEBI Registered Research Analyst | Reg. No. INH000020040 | SEBI (RA) Regulations, 2014. For Serious Investors → goindiastocks.com Follow us for more insights.

@PatakotaV they are brokers, not fund managers

@goindiastocks Have they written similar letter to their investors about their performance?

@Pran10000 unlikley

@goindiastocks Soros funded? 🤡

@FakeUpperCaste @cycleortrend Voters has the power to choose candidates with right policies

@goindiastocks @cycleortrend U mean voters hav power to make policies? What do u mean by “voters must change their attitude”?

@sushobhan Sorry copy right issues.

@goindiastocks Do you have a link to the original note? Thanks in advance

@pratbrat Agree we need a balance. The hope is that private sector buoyed by pick up in demand for it's products and services will circle back the amount in capex. However, private sector is so debt shy and margin happy that, they are stifling growth.

Low hanging fruit and what probably hurts India most - #freebies "5/ Cash transfer schemes are quietly crowding out capex - Women-only cash transfers across a dozen-plus states now total Rs 1.7–2.5 trillion annually — roughly 0.5% of GDP — and rising. In some states, these schemes absorb 2–3% of GSDP, squeezing infrastructure budgets. Bernstein isn't saying scrap them — targeted support has a role. But election-synchronised, unconditional, permanent transfers risk locking India into a low-productivity equilibrium where taxes fund today's consumption instead of tomorrow's capabilities."

@kaushaal03 Will pass on your message to Bernstein.

@goindiastocks Write an similar open letter to all the top 5 IT service Co's and the big industrial houses, if you have a spine.

@Maddy_C2018 I would disagree, every Indian does but some times you have to lose the battle to win the war. Like in market you have to survive to make money in the long run.

@goindiastocks As if BJP cares for India Development

@aksh_2018 agree, potential is much higher and AI is the reason why FIIs are ignoring India

@goindiastocks Most of us realize it whether it's infra, agriculture, energy or AI . Just need to wake up and smell the coffee

Hard hitting open letter to Modi ji by Bernstein research "India does not lack capital, talent, or ambition. What it requires now is a sharper willingness to take difficult decisions early, rather than defer them. The window to act is still open, but it is narrowing"

@athreya49 Things are not so bad. Let's be optimistic with this progressive govt.

Bernstein might get a letter from SEBI soon.

@sangeethv_ No arguing on that. Within the political constraints, this government has done well. Clearly they had no support for big bang reforms which the country needs to take growth to next level.

The Prime Minister is doing a decent job. Reduced corporate tax, income tax, GST and announced PLI support for manufacturing. It is the states and feudal attitude of leaders which is dragging the country.

@IronyMeter True that, India has moved away from colonial past, but some are still stuck.

@goindiastocks This is the issue with foreigners. They don't even know now PM sits in Seva Teerth. /s

@cycleortrend ha ha. New leader will not change anything till voters change their attitude. Nothing is free in life, its just that next generation pays

@goindiastocks Fuck it is brutally honest..... But who wants to face reality in India. Our policy is focused towards the next election. We need a new leader & our only last hope was netaji .

@UditGr4 Politics over economics is a reality till it doesn't work and countries have to take the bitter pill

@goindiastocks This is so true, but the political leadership irrespective of parties are too busy with freebies policy and staying in power that difficult decisions scare them a lot