Mark Montgomery

@ElaineM11584892 Time for tax reform. - but if you tax the individuals we also MUST TAX GAS and multi nationals first!! These groups are making the most from our sovereign wealth and stable Australian business government environment. PAY UP GAS TAX !!

@SpencerHakimian Didn’t know he could read ?

🚨Trump just posted this.

Israeli war criminals walking the streets of Australia- No different to ISIS brides coming back to Australia. Arrest them, lock them up, deport them. - NEVER AGAIN !!! Get these scumbags out of Australia !

@TheNoisyTrunk Not fit for government - couldnt even be book keeper for a lawn mowing business. Twit !!

And Tim Wilson gave us MORE. As if the "Salon" - which is seemingly a predominantly online business 'run' by an 18-year-old, wasn't enough, he gave us this also: See Speers very specific questions: David Speers asked at the #NPC: David Spears from the ABC. Thanks Tim Wilson for your address. The government says there's a whole lot of misinformation around its capital gains tax changes. I wonder if I could ask you to explain the example you just used in your speech. You talked about Sienna who started Tweenyskin five years ago, done well, business has grown. You said half of her profits will be taken by the silent shareholder, the Prime Minister. Can you just explain how that would happen? The government says existing exemptions for small business would remain. So how exactly would Sienna lose half her profit? And here is what goober TIM replied - Remember, NPC rules mean Speers cannot ask another question so Tim's reply goes unchecked. Read this bullshit, or better still, watch him say it. ▓ Skip the bit BETWEEN the bricks ▓ if you are going to watch the video, but read the explanation below. ▓ Tim's reply and its full of shit: Well it depends on when Sienna chooses to opt out of her business and sell it and for what price. I mean she started from her bedroom, her cost structures were zero so of course she's going to have a maximum uplift associated with her businesses. A lot of the people who are setting up businesses are the treasurers out there today spinning a message, as often he does, highlighting existing exemptions for CGT. Most of those are focused at the back end of people's lives, particularly as they head towards retirement and also based on the price at which they sell. I can't tell you what Sienna's going to sell but I can tell you the work, saving and sacrifice and everything they have put into it could, depending on the exit strategy and price, ultimately face up to 47%. But is it possible she could pay no capital gains tax as well? Well I can't give you, we're dealing with hypotheticals, I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at based on the current application of the law. But there are a lot of small business owners all around the country that are looking at the proposals put in this budget and not just do they think it comes in a tax them, they are looking at it and saying we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2am on a Sunday morning when nobody else was there. And all of a sudden the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>▓ 1. The Hypothetical Dodge Tim Wilson explicitly admits his example is hypothetical: "I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at..." Translation: He has no concrete evidence that Sienna (or any small business owner like her) would face a 47% tax under the current or proposed CGT rules. Reality: The government’s proposed changes do not affect small business CGT concessions. Sienna, as a small business owner, would still qualify for: →15-year exemption (100% tax-free if she retires and owned the business for 15+ years). →50% active asset reduction (only 25% of the gain is taxable after discounts). Retirement exemption (up to $500k lifetime exemption). →Roll-over relief (defer CGT by reinvesting). Result: Her effective CGT rate would likely be 0–25%, not 47%. His answer is a word salad to avoid admitting the truth: His example is baseless. 2. The "Silent Shareholder" Myth - Tim claims: "...the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much." Reality Check: The current top marginal tax rate is 47% (45% + 2% Medicare levy), but this only applies to salary earners on income over $190k. For small business owners like Sienna: If structured as a company (Probably not she is under 18 or just turned 18, so likely, we will come back to this, 'held' by her ex-beautician mother/family): 25% company tax rate. If selling the business: 0–25% CGT after concessions. No scenario exists where the government takes 47% of her business sale profits under the proposed changes. The "doubling" claim is false. The budget does not double CGT for small businesses. It tightens loopholes for high-income earners (>$450k) and super funds, not small business owners. 3. The Emotional Manipulation Tim leans on melodrama: "...we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2 am on a Sunday morning..." Irrelevant to tax policy. Hard work doesn’t justify false claims about tax rates. Distraction tactic: He avoids the Speers direct question ("How exactly would Sienna lose half her profit?") by appealing to emotion. 4. The Press Club Rules Loophole David Speers couldn’t follow up due to Press Club rules. Tim knew this. He used the format to dodge accountability, knowing he couldn’t be pressed for details. TIM IS SPREADING MISINFORMATION like a PRO COOKER. Quote - Tim Wilson: "We're dealing with hypotheticals"

@Andy53817711 @LawyerAdamHouda Probably be more $ under LNP - be very pre warned

@LawyerAdamHouda You voted for it Don’t forget how much money albo just gave the star people

How ridiculous are the NSW POLICE officers in this latest scandal?? #FreePalestine #auspol

@KookyKrumble @sanche5717 @LawyerAdamHouda Watch your mouth

@sanche5717 @LawyerAdamHouda Why are you go fuck yourself, dickhead you fucking moron

@Johnnyqi7z @LawyerAdamHouda The only terror cloth is the Israeli flag ! Police should be rounding up IDF terrorists war criminals and deporting them knts

@LawyerAdamHouda That terror cloth around your neck is worth the time to investigate

@skyeliner It is a bloody disgraceful interview and should be called out. Trying to point score and sound intelligent but far from it !!! Gnat Barr is an idiot and so is the other LNP corrupt mouth piece Jane Hume who was silent for a change. Ch7 media at its worst!!

She’s is deliberately confusing, the already confused, ch7 viewers. He couldn’t have made the explanation any clearer. Jane Hume not saying a word, for once. Sitting there looking like she’s had too much Botox. 🫪

@GeeMamm @skyeliner @natalie_barr @SenatorHume I enjoyed the silence from that corner of the interview unlike the Nat Barr who would not shut up and listen to the adult in the room. She was like a seagull trying to eat a hot chip flapping and squawking 😩👎🏽

@skyeliner FFS! @natalie_barr is a bit dim isn't she? And @SenatorHume sat there with nothing constructive to say, as she is completely out of her depth

@CartoJJ1 @skyeliner @Qldaah It is a bloody disgraceful interview and should be called out. Trying to point score and sound intelligent but far from it !!!

@skyeliner @Qldaah Natt just doesn’t have a clue. No matter how many times it is explained to her she doesn’t get it. Fool and Hume is sitting there like a dummy hoping Natt can score a point , bloody hopeless dummy.

@jaquix173 @skyeliner So annoying!! Brainless comments and interruptions with pointless point scoring 😡.

@skyeliner Poor Natalie - she really does have limited brain power doesnt she? And she doesn't want to get to know about it. She just wants to sound right. Waving a mobile phone around as if it's information better than the govts, is ridiculous. The constant interruptions sickening.

@HarryFromSyd @Dismayed12 @skyeliner So what do you think the answer is now this change will potentially come in - what is the best option going forward here ??

@Dismayed12 @skyeliner Of course it changes you cretinous leftist amoeba. Discretionary testamentary trusts created after budget night are no longer viable for anyone to use to sensibly protect their children.

@skyeliner Such an annoying interview - commentator kept butting in on points I wanted to hear. She is a Fkn moron who lives the sound of her own voice.

@SEATO_rvlt @PaulineHansonOz @MONI__MONZ Yeah, it’s a great idea, but we would be worse off under this proposal. Do you know why any Gas lobbyists are not up in arms about this? It’s because they would be very happy with this arrangement. Does that make sense to you? Get the big picture.

@PaulineHansonOz @MONI__MONZ This is a common sense approach. Solid ideas.

So you don’t get it twisted from the media, I want you to be able to hear every word of One Nation’s gas policy, in full. We want the Australian people to take ownership of our natural resources, for the government to act as a partner in encouraging more oil and gas production, take care of our fuel and energy security, and pay down our debt. I said much more on this at the Australian Energy Producers conference in Adelaide. This is my policy announcement in full, with additional Q and A from the 14 minute mark. We will continue to consult on this and make sure we get it right. One Nation has a vision for future generations, not just the next election cycle.

@ZorgTheEmporer @PaulineHansonOz @OneNationAus That about sums it up pretty well…. It’s a wrought. And a free for all.

@PaulineHansonOz This is bullshit....here's the grift @OneNationAus

@ScottGordonOne @PaulineHansonOz Yeah, it’s a great idea, but we would be worse off under this proposal. Do you know why any Gas lobbyists are not up in arms about this? It’s because they would be very happy with this arrangement. Does that make sense to you? Get the big picture.

This new gas and oil policy is exactly what Australia needs. No more letting foreign companies extract our resources and leave us with high prices. A 10% wellhead royalty + government equity stakes means Australians finally get a proper share of our own wealth. This is how strong leadership puts Australians First. Well done @PaulineHanson.

@ABaceolive @PaulineHansonOz Yeah, it’s a great idea, but we would be worse off under this proposal. Do you know why any Gas lobbyists are not up in arms about this? It’s because they would be very happy with this arrangement. Does that make sense to you? Get the big picture.

Absolutely spot on, Pauline. This is the smart, practical path to make Australia a genuine energy superpower ... ramping up oil & gas production with real Australian ownership via a sovereign wealth fund, like Norway. Scrap the net zero madness, cut the red/green tape, and secure cheap reliable energy + export billions. Way better than the current bullshit that's driving investment away, killing jobs, and making us poorer. Let's actually use our resources and secure our kids future!

@PaulineHansonOz Old bigot compromised granny - Great idea except it doesn’t add up and in fact would be worse off !!! Dumb and not what Australians want ! You don’t have any Gas lobbies up in arms about proposal so they’re obviously happy about it - makes sense??? 🙄

@GaryPetersonUSA @theliamnissan Yeah that looks like a conman nice job 👍🏽

The left can’t handle my daughter’s new President Trump tattoo. Sorry, wokesters, consider yourselves owned.

@JanisOzoli53418 @20FTW @PaulineHansonOz Let me help you - you buy a house and have a mortgage. How long dose it take to pay it off. ? Buy the wrong house and pay too much - where dose that leave you? No renovations no landscaping- nothing to show for it !! Sound familiar JUST BAD DEBT 💸 LNP Never again

@20FTW @PaulineHansonOz In case you had not noticed, the government of which Josh Frydenberg was treasurer has not been in power for four years. Are you suggesting the current government are completely incapable of doing anything about the debt?

This Labor government is economically incompetent. They are stealing from the younger generation, putting $1 trillion in debt on the national credit card. This amounts to $36,000 for every Australian, and every young person will have to pay this back and more. They're forcing young Australians to compete against mass migration for a rental, while putting home ownership completely out of reach. I won't take lectures on "intergenerational equity" from this Labor government. They abandoned hope for this country and all of its people long ago.