Femi Adeniran

This video reminds me of my ex and how I gave her stability, and how it was evident that she would end up as my wife. Every girl that came around me knew she was the one, and they all left me alone, as expected. I was there for her in all aspects except that I was not financially buoyant enough to take her on fancy dates regularly or get her Valentine gifts and all that materialistic "romantic" stuff (I know this because she told me prior to the breakup). The first thing she did was convince herself that I didn't love her (I made a post about compromise and love on my WhatsApp, and she replied, "I know I am not the love of your life"). She focused on the things I didn't do and ignored everything I did, just to play the "you are not doing enough" antics on me. She then played the religion card as the final one to end things. I didn't even try to explain because I knew I had given my best at that time. The funnier thing is, she ended things when I brought up the topic of marriage casually: "You will get married to me." "Who told you I will marry you?" And the religious excuse followed, lol. Sometimes, I think about the thought process that influenced that decision, and it makes me marvel at how the minds of women work. It's all "if you give a woman reassurance, she won't leave," but this one convinced herself that my reassurance was fake, even though all prior actions suggested otherwise. That experience taught me a valuable lesson about women, and I realized that all women are the same in that aspect, because I would have sworn that this was a very good and understanding woman. But you see, when someone doesn't believe in you well enough to stay, they will hold onto the flimsiest excuse to leave. Which brings me to my conclusion: if you are convinced you are doing right by someone, and they believe it is not enough for them to stay, never try to convince them. Let them leave without making a single effort to make them stay, like I did. Prioritize yourself, do your best for your partner and people, and if they say your best is not enough, leave them be. Life is good.

I love being a thick babe. 😩 every outfit just sits well.

In honour of my dad’s extraordinary life and legacy

Gobe: tomorrow—Hausa Gobe: commotion, problem, chaos—Yoruba. Interestingly, "mo ni lorile, odi gobe" was supposed to mean "dance, until tomorrow/ the morning." The streets interpreted it as "cause trouble/chaos"🤣🤣

Guess where they are from? Very simple sef. 😁

Wirtz’s parents have actually changed the trajectory of our club for the next decade

Big Tech just paid ~$40 billion in two years to avoid buying anything. The math is absurd. Google spent $2.4B on Windsurf to hire 40 people. That works out to $60M per head. Microsoft paid $650M to gut Inflection and take 70 employees. Amazon spent $400M+ on Covariant for three founders and 40 engineers. Google dropped $2.7B on Character AI to rehire Noam Shazeer, who they’d let walk in 2021. Now Nvidia announces $20B for Groq just three months after it raised at $6.9B. Every single one of these companies explicitly stated “we are not acquiring this company.” Jensen Huang literally told employees: “While we are adding talented employees to our ranks and licensing Groq’s IP, we are not acquiring Groq as a company.” Microsoft said the same about Inflection. Google said the same about Character AI and Windsurf. Amazon said the same about Adept and Covariant. The semantic gymnastics exist for one reason: antitrust. Traditional acquisitions trigger Hart-Scott-Rodino filing requirements. Regulators review. Competitors object. Deals take 12-18 months to close. In an AI arms race where model capabilities improve every 6 months, that regulatory timeline is existential. By the time a deal clears, the tech is already outdated. So Big Tech invented the “reverse acquihire.” Pay billions to license IP, hire the founding team, leave a shell company behind with a new CEO and a skeleton crew. Google did it with Character AI (Noam Shazeer + 30 researchers, left behind a co-op structure). Microsoft with Inflection (Mustafa Suleyman + 70 staff, left Sean White as CEO of nothing). Amazon twice with Adept (David Luan + research team) and Covariant (three co-founders + 25% of staff). Now Nvidia with Groq (Jonathan Ross + senior leadership, Simon Edwards inherits a cloud business). A whistleblower complaint filed with the FTC, DOJ, and SEC in January 2025 alleged that the Amazon-Covariant deal was “deliberately and unlawfully structured” to dodge antitrust review. The complaint claimed Covariant’s new CEO told employees that if Amazon had tried to buy them outright, regulators would have killed it. The deal terms reportedly restrict which licenses Covariant can sell without paying Amazon a fee. The FTC opened investigations into Microsoft-Inflection and Amazon-Adept. Both appear to be at a standstill. Amazon’s Adept deal closed without further action. The exposed logic: buying a company twice (once for talent, once for the husk) now costs less than waiting for regulatory approval of a single acquisition. Windsurf got split three ways in 72 hours. Google paid $2.4B for leadership and license. Cognition paid ~$250M for what remained. OpenAI walked away with nothing after Microsoft objected to IP terms. Big Tech found a loophole wide enough to drive $40 billion through while regulators debate whether hiring someone’s entire executive team and licensing all their IP counts as “control.”

BBC gathered that American strikes hit Lakurawa camps in Tangaza LG of Sokoto State.

Bovi Ugboma and family 😍🎄

If you ever pretended you love me and made me lose who truly loved me. You will marry 14 times and you will marry wrong!!!!

An advice for a young person ?¿

If you no hear Yoruba omo u Dey miss 😂😂💔