Mark Grinter

@Eccothe2k @Krenkx Tax isn't based on what benefits him? Wtf is the point of tax then?

@Krenkx Our tax system isn’t based solely on what benefits you, as i said the median Brit would benefit

0.48% and 0.96% on second homes would benefit 90% of people in the country Only people with 5 homes or homes worth millions of pounds will lose out

@FBAwayDays Thank god for that, he's worse than those screeching females they insist on having.

@Footballtweet I'm English, but the only non-wanker there is Roy Keane. So mine's an IPA please Roy.

⚽🍻 You can choose one pundit to go to the pub and watch a whole day of football with: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Gary Neville 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jamie Carragher 🇮🇪 Roy Keane 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Micah Richards 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Gary Lineker 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ian Wright 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Joe Hart 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Wayne Rooney 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Robbie Savage 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Simon Jordan 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Michael Owen 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Peter Crouch Who do you pick? 👇

@terrychristian The only one listening to the electorate was Truss, but of course the people in Control of the Money didn't like that idea.

Starmer by a mile

@Kevin_Maguire Fluent you say, erm, erm, I'm not erm so erm sure erm about erm that.

Farage and Reform would've been bricking it watching that Burnham speech. Fluent, authentic and promising change for the better. They should've been careful what they wished for when wanting Starmer gone.

Oh please fuck off and let us watch the Football. #WorldCupFinal

WTAF us this shit! Where's the Football gone? #WorldCupFinal

@Keir_Starmer Daft cnut!

The test of any Prime Minister is: do you leave your country in a better place than you found it? I’m proud that the answer is yes.

@henrywinter Missing the point entirely! Nobody doubts we have enough players capable of trapping a football. The problem lies between the ears, an absolute lack of a positive mindset and intelligence have been generationaly absent. Until we address that we'll continue to underwhelm.

England’s players aren’t the problem. They must take some responsibility but, really, they’re not the problem. A good group with some exceptional players. They have two of the top five scorers of this World Cup, Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham, both world class. They have a winger in Anthony Gordon just bought by Barcelona who was troubling Argentina (and scoring) until taken off. A dynamic midfielder in Elliot Anderson bought for £116m who belied his relative youth to impress at his first senior tournament. Another £100m+ midfielder in Declan Rice, who fought valiantly even when it looked like a brief illness and a long, intense season caught up with him. Saka, Rogers and some of the defenders like the hugely promising O’Reilly. Good players.  A possession man in Kobbie Mainoo kicking his polished heels on the bench. Talents left behind like Wharton, Palmer, Foden, Alexander-Arnold, Scott and Gibbs-White. More coming through like Dowman. England have the players.

@PhilMyers53 OK the moment is over. Keir is a Grifting Cnut!

Shall we put the recriminations to one side for the moment and simply say Thank you Keir Good luck for the future

@antonybullen57 @FBAwayDays Why? He was managing perfectly OK on his own.

@FBAwayDays Very strange how the English fans didn’t step in 🤔

3 Argentine fans tried attacking an Englishman during the England game last night. The English man took them on, on his own. 💪

@zarahsultana Shut up you cnut.

Keep Jude Bellingham’s name out of your mouth.

I'm assuming Rashford has money on Congo #ENG

Remember, Diversity is our strength and British Values.

@Richyf321 @baroninvestment I think that's the point of the question! Where? who? because he must have missed them.

@baroninvestment Better opportunities out there

Why are you STRATEGIC MINERALS holders selling today?

@TomK_Brit1993 Being a compulsive Liar doesn't seem to be helping.

What do you think his biggest mistake was as Prime Minister?

@piersmorgan Piers Morgan says something sensible, I guess if you wait lon g enough.............

Given the ridiculous volume of Prime Ministers that Britain’s endured in recent years, I think it should now be law that if a PM quits or is forced out during his/her term, it automatically triggers a new general election. That might concentrate their minds to do a better job.

How dare this strange, soulless man presume to define “the spirit of Britain”. Millions know what Britain was and ever will be and it’s not Keir Starmer.

@Peston The absolute singular thing a good Leader needs, is the one thing he avowedly hates. Really couldn't make it up.

My unscientific weekend poll of Labour MPs and government ministers is that Keir Starmer will be replaced as their leader and the country’s prime minister “by the end of the year”. They also say that an immediate defenestration and snap leadership election should be avoided if possible, for two reasons. First, the party needs to have a debate about its future direction and what could be a “big story of hope for Britain” they could coalesce around and sell to voters Second, the leadership change should be orderly, respectful and likely to yield a stable outcome. This means, they say, that the process needs to be long enough to allow Andy Burnham the opportunity to resign as mayor of Greater Manchester and contest a by-election. Which is not to say they all want Burnham as Britain’s next prime minister. Some do. Some don’t. What it means is they fear he and his supporters would never cease to lobby to be Labour leader, and therefore no new leader would be secure, unless Burnham was given the opportunity to win a leadership contest or crash and burn. “If Andy feels he is blocked again, any new leader will be toast before the next election,” one senior MP said to me. And to give Burnham the rope he wants, the leadership contest has to be delayed till the autumn, say his friends and foes. I have two other pieces of intelligence, or perhaps more properly unintelligence. No MP or and minister is able to explain to me how this “orderly” transition to a new leader would actually transpire, if the PM were to dig in and refuse to leave - which right now Starmer shows every sign of doing. There is a chance that the cabinet would unite against him and collectively make him an offer, to go with dignity on a set timetable, that he could not refuse. Ministers are as we speak talking to each other about just such a scenario. But that would be to believe they are capable of sublimating their individual personal ambitions and enjoyment of high office for what they will see as a nebulous greater good. Most of us don’t need to consult an AI superbrain to attach the appropriate probability to ministerial turkeys voting for Christmas. So tomorrow’s 49th relaunch speech by the PM is both profoundly important and trivially unimportant. If it is an absolute car crash then the consensus of MPs and ministers that Starmer can stay a few more weeks and months will evaporate, and the accidental rebel Catherine West would secure her 81 nominations to be the stalking horse challenger. Starmer would be fighting for his political life. But I have been briefed to expect a speech that shows contrition, that Starmer “gets it”, but that it is too soon for him to come up with a bold and unifying new vision for the country, not least because he avowedly hates doing “the vision thing”. In other words, the speech will probably be a bit of a “meh”, neither one thing or another, neither hastening his exit or cancelling it. Which, possibly, for Starmer, in his current dire straits, would be a win.

@narindertweets @UKLabour How obtuse do you have to be to believe that there are people out there not understanding what you're doing here?

Can @UKLabour start doing their job and putting out information like this please

The media has us believing that Reform took over the country. But the reality is this. How embarrassing