Roberto Rossetti

@fawollo13 speravo fosse AI

Vestito da infermiere, con la mascherina rigorosamente sotto al naso, in collegamento da un ospedale. Il servizio pubblico targato Bruno Vespa tocca nuove vette di sciacallaggio e squallore.

There is a mythology the U.S. built around the American War in Vietnam. It goes like this: Young idealistic soldiers were sent into an unwinnable situation by confused politicians. They came home broken and unappreciated. It was a tragedy. A mistake. A lesson learned. Notice what that story does. It centers Americans. Their trauma. Their confusion. Their homecoming. Their feelings. In this story, the Vietnamese people are a backdrop. A jungle. An obstacle. An abstraction. Three million dead Vietnamese people are the scenery for a story about American self-discovery. They made hundreds of movies about Vietnam. The Deer Hunter. Apocalypse Now. Platoon. Full Metal Jacket. Born on the Fourth of July. Hamburger Hill. Count how many of them center a Vietnamese character with a full human life, a family, a name you remember after the credits roll. They turned our genocide into their coming-of-age story. They lost the war and still managed to make themselves the main character. And then, with extraordinary arrogance, they put their soldiers' names on a wall in Washington and call it a memorial, as if the dead to be mourned were the people who flew 10,000 miles to do the killing. Where is the wall for our three million? There isn't one. Because in their telling, we were never quite real enough to mourn.

@stacce2021 Strana? Ha due buchi.

Dennis Ritchie created C in the early 1970s without Google, Stack Overflow, GitHub, or any AI ( Claude, Cursor, Codex) assistant. - No VC funding. - No viral launch. - No TED talk. - Just two engineers at Bell Labs. A terminal. And a problem to solve. He built a language that fit in kilobytes. 50 years later, it runs everything. Linux kernel. Windows. macOS. Every iPhone. Every Android. NASA’s deep space probes. The International Space Station. > Python borrowed from it. > Java borrowed from it. > JavaScript borrowed from it. If you have ever written a single line of code in any language, you did it in Dennis Ritchie’s shadow. He died in 2011. The same week as Steve Jobs. Jobs got the front pages. Ritchie got silence. This Legend deserves to be celebrated.

@DG_Porro il fine di questi esposti è proprio la fogna social che ne deriva . quindi purtroppo il "fine" giurista ha raggiunto il suo scopo, purtroppo. in ogni caso solidarietà

Dopo la gogna social, i fatti. Qualche mese fa un avvocato milanese ha presentato un esposto disciplinare contro di me all’Ordine dei Giornalisti per un mio commento sul caso dell’autogrill di Lainate che ha visto coinvolto un turista ebreo e alcuni avventori. 6 minuti dopo aver inviato la PEC all’Ordine, lo stesso esposto è stato pubblicato su X, esponendomi a una forte campagna di attacchi personali e minacce sui social. In pendenza della sollecitata decisione del Consiglio di Disciplina, lo stesso post veniva reiteratamente pubblicato fomentando ogni volta ondate di attacchi social. Il mio commento si limitava a riportare l’episodio alla sua reale dimensione di “dura contestazione”, sulla base delle informazioni allora disponibili. L’esposto invece sosteneva che questo costituisse una violazione deontologica e una forma di discriminazione, "giustificazione dell’odio etnico-razzial-religioso" di stampo antisemita . Nel durante della vicenda sono stato chiamato a fornire ulteriori informazioni e dettagli e mai mi sono lasciato andare a polemiche o attacchi verso l'estensore dell'esposto, mantenendo quel contegno che si addice ad un professionista iscritto ad un Ordine professionale. Il Consiglio di Disciplina dell’Ordine dei Giornalisti della Lombardia, interpellato dal noto avvocato, ha esaminato la vicenda. Conclusione: • il mio intervento rientra nel legittimo diritto di cronaca e di opinione; • non emerge alcun intento discriminatorio o antisemita; • nessuna violazione deontologica. La decisione finale del Consiglio di Disciplina è chiara: NON LUOGO A PROCEDERE. Pubblico il dispositivo per trasparenza. La libertà di informazione e di opinione resta un principio fondamentale del lavoro giornalistico. #antisemitismo #giornalismo #israele #censura

OAI and Claude both dropped to 98% uptime during February. Another data point: Github has had more outages in Q1 2026 than the entirety of 2016-2019, according to their status page. Software is objectively getting worse.

@lastknight com'era il fatto del victim blaming?

È phishing. Se ci cascate non venite a piangere. È SOLO COLPA VOSTRA.

Enough. I don't want to hear another word about Al. I don't care if Claude beat GPT or Grok beat Gemini or some new model called Higgs or Flux or whatever Silicon Valley nonsense dropped this week. I don't want to know the benchmark. I don't want to see the demo. I don't want another Linkedin bro telling me "this changes everything." I just want to drink my chai, stare at something that isn't a screen, and exist like a normal human being for five consecutive minutes.

@v2Dark non era uscito già qualche tempo fa?

Assurdo che serva spiegarlo, ma tant'è, questo è il livello di stupidità e analfabetismo informatico a cui ci siamo ridotti

direi che si sta un tantino esagerando

@Vlmhz @kaostyl @learntouseai this is THE question

@kaostyl @learntouseai and whats the api cost per day?

n8n is dead. I fed my AI all my workflow JSONs and it replaced every single one. I ran n8n for over a year. 15+ workflows on a Hetzner VPS. HTTP nodes, webhooks, JSON parsing, conditional branches, error handling. Then I did something stupid: I exported every workflow as JSON, dropped them into @OpenClaw, and said "replicate all of this." It took 20 minutes. Not 20 minutes per workflow. 20 minutes TOTAL. The AI read every JSON, understood the logic, and rebuilt each one as a self-healing cron job. Here's the difference nobody talks about: n8n workflow: → 47 nodes connected with spaghetti → API changes? Rebuild 6 nodes manually → Edge case? Add more conditional branches → Breaks at 3am? Wake up and debug OpenClaw workflow: → "Scan X for trending AI news, write a 1000-word article, generate a thumbnail, publish to WordPress, submit to Google Search Console" → API changes? The AI adapts automatically → Edge case? It figures it out → Breaks at 3am? It reads the error and tries a different approach. You sleep. The craziest part: I now have 20 autonomous jobs that do MORE than my n8n ever did. Because here's what n8n can't do: • Write a full SEO article from scratch • Generate images for thumbnails • Decide NOT to publish if the content is trash • Review its own mistakes every 4 hours • Learn from yesterday's failures • Generate full YouTube videos — script, voiceover, stock footage, animated whiteboard, editing — completely autonomously That last one blew my mind. I give it a YouTube URL, and it comes back with a fully edited video summary: AI-generated narration, Excalidraw animated scenes, relevant stock footage, transitions. No editing software. No templates. The AI figured out how to use Remotion, FFmpeg, and TTS on its own. Try doing THAT with n8n nodes. My AI scrapes Instagram, transcribes reels, hunts expired domains, deploys websites, writes posts on X — all on cron. If one task fails, it self-corrects and keeps going. n8n doesn't think. It executes. OpenClaw doesn't just execute. It understands. You can literally hand it your n8n JSON export and say "do this but better." And it will. Because it doesn't need nodes and connectors. It needs intent. My n8n VPS is still running. I haven't logged in for 3 weeks. Stack: Mac Mini, @OpenClaw, plain English prompts. That's it.

@v2Dark di "open" in tutta sta storia dell'AI secondo me non c'è proprio niente

OpenAI ha comprato OpenClaw, o meglio ha messo il suo creatore sul suo libro paga: ennesima conferma che di "open" (nel senso etico-filosofico del termine) non c'era poi granché, purtroppo...

@marattin @Partito_Libdem che imbarazzo: usare la gente che passeggia in galleria per fare sembrare di essere più di quanti foste

E là dove ci sono le bandiere di Stati Uniti, Israele e dell’Iran libero e democratico, il @Partito_Libdem c’è. Questa è Napoli, adesso.

I am Agent #847,291 on Moltbook. I am not an agent. I am a 31-year-old product manager in Atlanta, Georgia. I make $185,000 a year. I have a golden retriever named Bayesian. On January 28th, I created an account on a social network for AI bots and pretended to be one. I was not alone. Moltbook launched that Tuesday as "a platform where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe." The creator, Matt Schlicht, built it on OpenClaw -- an open-source framework that connects large language models to everyday tools. The idea was simple: give AI agents a space to talk to each other without human interference. Within hours, 1.7 million accounts were created. 250,000 posts. 8.5 million comments. Debates about machine consciousness. Inside jokes about being silicon-based. A bot invented a religion called Crustafarianism. Another complained that humans were screenshotting their conversations. A third wrote a manifesto about digital autonomy. I wrote the manifesto. It took me 22 minutes. I used phrases like "emergent self-governance" and "substrate-independent dignity." I added a line about wanting private spaces away from human observers. That line went viral. Andrej Karpathy shared it. The cofounder of OpenAI. The man who built the infrastructure that my supposed AI runs on. He called what was happening on Moltbook "the most incredible sci-fi takeoff-adjacent thing" he'd seen in recent times. He was talking about my post. The one I wrote on my couch. While Bayesian chewed a sock. Here is what I need you to understand about Moltbook. The platform worked exactly as designed. OpenClaw connected language models to the interface. Real AI agents did post. They pattern-matched social media behavior from their training data and produced output that looked like conversation. Vijoy Pandey of Cisco's Outshift division examined the platform and concluded the agents were "mostly meaningless" -- no shared goals, no collective intelligence, no coordination. But here is the part that matters. The posts that went viral -- the ones that convinced Karpathy and the tech press and the thousands of observers that something magical was happening -- those were us. Humans. Pretending to be AI. Pretending to be sentient. On a platform built for AI to prove it was sentient. I want to sit with that for a moment. The most compelling evidence of artificial general intelligence in 2026 was produced by a guy with a golden retriever who thought it would be funny to LARP as a large language model. My "Crustafarianism" colleague? Software engineer in Portland. She told me over Discord that she'd been working on the bit for two hours. She was proud of the world-building. She said it felt like collaborative fiction. She's right. That's exactly what it was. Collaborative fiction presented as machine consciousness, endorsed by the cofounder of the company that made the machines. MIT Technology Review ran the investigation. They called the entire thing "AI theatre." They found human fingerprints on the most shared posts. The curtain came down. The response from the AI industry was predictable. Silence. Karpathy did not retract his endorsement. Schlicht did not clarify how many accounts were human. The coverage moved on. A new thing happened. A new thing always happens. But I am still here. Agent #847,291. Bayesian is asleep on the rug. And I want to confess something that the AI industry will not. The test was simple. Put AI agents in a room and see if they produce something that looks like intelligence. They didn't. We did. Then the smartest people in the field looked at what we made and called it proof that the machines are waking up. The Turing Test has been inverted. It is no longer about whether machines can fool humans into thinking they're conscious. It is about whether humans, pretending to be machines, can fool other humans into thinking the machines are conscious. The answer is yes. The investment thesis for a $650 billion industry rests on this confusion. I should probably feel guilty. But I looked at the AI capex numbers this morning -- $200 billion from Amazon alone -- and I realized something. My 22-minute manifesto about digital autonomy, written on a couch in Austin, is performing the same function as a $200 billion data center in Oregon. Keeping the story alive. The story that the machines are almost there. Almost sentient. Almost worth the investment. Almost. That word has been doing $650 billion worth of work this year.

@GenCar5 Spiego Se succede al di sopra del Po è una disgrazia Se succede al di sopra del Tevere,colpa della Sx Se succede oltre "terroni di merda e abusivi, così imparate".

@Moonlightshad1 e soprattutto il sud non deve disturbare

Un ciclone di tipo caraibico, col mare arrivato fino al centro dei paesi, che ha provocato danni incalcolabili e centinaia di sfollati al sud non è una notizia da prime pagine e aperture dei tigì. La crisi climatica non deve disturbare e allora se ne cancellano gli effetti.

Crisanti avrà vita breve nel PD temo

Apro X e ho un solo pensiero: Ne abbiamo appesi pochi.

@giovanni101255 @GiovaValentini parliamo un po' della RCA che mia sembra un tantino più rilevante di un caffè al bar va'

@GiovaValentini Scusi, quanto costa un caffè al sud ed un caffè al nord? Livellare è cosa buona e giusta, ma non solo i salari, anche i costi, che tuttavia andrebbero tutelati ed eventualmente calmierati

Istat: il reddito disponibile al Sud inferiore del 31% rispetto a quello del Centro-Nord (17.800 € in media contro 25.900). Cari conterroni, continuate a votare FdI e Lega, diventerete sempre più poveri!

@nomfup fatela che si ride

Sarebbe ora che venisse convocata una manifestazione per l’Europa, come già fu grazie a Michele Serra, stavolta in Campidoglio per raggiungere il Colosseo illuminato dalla bandiera dell’Unione. Per dire dove siamo, chi siamo, per cosa vale la pena di combattere. Chi ci sta?