Andy

952 posts

Andy

Andy

@gtempx

Politically homeless, can’t stand champagne socialists and populists. Pro free speech.

Katılım Eylül 2025
154 Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@GordonMurdie Many of the same about the parties in Downing Street, which labour carried on talking about long after Boris was taken to task. The problem is if you create an environment like that in opposition then you have to be prepared to experience when in government.
English
0
0
1
112
Gordon Murdie
Gordon Murdie@GordonMurdie·
There's quite a lot of energy being expended on Mandelson who was sacked 7 months ago. Probably best to give it all a well earned rest as it's getting silly now. Govt needs peace to do Govt stuff.
English
562
140
836
39.1K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@RachelReevesMP Just stop Miliband wasting tax payers money, reduce fuel duty, fuel VAT and then stop gaslighting the electorate, this is your fault.
English
0
0
0
466
Rachel Reeves
Rachel Reeves@RachelReevesMP·
Working people shouldn't bear the brunt of global gas price shocks while electricity generators make exceptional profits. So we're taking action to help break the link between high gas prices and high electricity prices, meaning stronger protection against future energy shocks.
English
2.1K
204
866
349.4K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@Liam_Holman99 He isn’t the Prime Minister, might that have something to do with it?
English
0
0
7
124
Liam Holman
Liam Holman@Liam_Holman99·
The media is asking what Starmer knew about Mandelson's vetting. But they didn't ask if Nigel Farage was also paid by Russians as an MEP as he asked similar questions to Nathan Gill.
English
278
184
730
14.4K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@helloKi30596224 I’m no fan of her politics, but she was elected by people who were well aware about her tactics and it’s their opinion that matters not yours.
English
0
0
1
618
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@g_gosden The electorate is sick of the arrogance and disrespect coming from both sides of the political spectrum from within the establishment. It’s divisive and unnecessary such as your reply.
English
0
0
5
45
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@JenniferJS_ @SamCoatesSky You haven’t been watching very closely. Sam pursued Boris Johnson with equal fervour. It isn’t a bias thing he knows there is something wrong with this story. I sense most of the public think so too.
English
0
0
1
244
Jennifer Stewart
Jennifer Stewart@JenniferJS_·
Poor @SamCoatesSky - he must be so disappointed that Keir Starmer told the truth, didn't mislead Parliament, hasn't been forced out and didn't resign. In fact he came out of that session stronger and with more support than ever.
English
494
261
1.4K
23.3K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@markofagenius This is what always happens. They create a narrative so that we can all argue whether something did or didn’t happen to distract us from the fact that Starmer in appointing Mandelson demonstrated diabolical judgement. He needs to go.
English
1
0
3
92
Mark Mitchener
Mark Mitchener@markofagenius·
So Keir didn’t lie. That will do for me today.
English
405
90
724
14K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@Anniepop2027 @SkyNews You’re perfectly entitled to your opinion, but you are definitely in the minority.
English
0
0
0
46
Anne
Anne@Anniepop2027·
Brilliant by Starmer 100% on his brief. Obviously honest. He didn’t know. And like everything else, he’s fixed it. Badenoch opines about correcting the record when Johnson took months and still didn’t. You’ve lost again. Get over it. @SkyNews
English
1.1K
392
1.9K
65.2K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@RupaHuq This isn’t about the Tory party it’s about the public losing confidence in the Prime Minister. Nobody cares what MPs think it’s the electorate who have lost faith and that’s what really matters.
English
0
0
0
751
Rupa Huq MP
Rupa Huq MP@RupaHuq·
I was at the Prime Minister's important statement on the Peter Mandelson scandal. Mistakes were made but the Tory party are all about faux outrage when they presided over scandal after scandal They even had no anti-corruption tsar after last one resigned following Boris blunders
English
1.5K
300
1.3K
102K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@Lawyer_AOthman @zarahsultana @DillyHussain88 It’s not defamation, she said it in parliament as did Lee Anderson. It’s called Parliamentary privilege which gives her immunity from defamation. Far worse gets said in other European Parliaments.
English
1
0
17
446
Ahmed Othman
Ahmed Othman@Lawyer_AOthman·
@zarahsultana @DillyHussain88 You cannot accuse and defame people publicly like that. He is the PM of England. At least have some respect for his position and for the House. AND you publish it yourself. Either you don't know the right from the wrong, or there really is something wrong. What an attitude.
English
67
2
29
5.7K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
Johnson was an elected politician appointed Foreign Secretary by May; no formal vetting failure, just internal intel access limits over trust. Cummings had lower-level clearance as a political adviser, standard for such roles unlike ambassador vetting. Mandelson failed developed vetting for a top diplomatic post with classified intel, yet FO overruled it after Starmer announced him so your points do not carry any weight.
English
0
0
0
40
Andrew Fisher
Andrew Fisher@merman1974·
Boris Johnson failed vetting, yet Theresa May appointed him Foreign Secretary. Dominic Cummings was never vetted, yet had free access to Government and Number 10. Quit trying to bring down Starmer.
English
1.2K
1.8K
6.9K
158.2K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@PippaCrerar The electorate don’t believe him, he has to go.
English
0
0
0
11
Pippa Crerar
Pippa Crerar@PippaCrerar·
EXCL: Keir Starmer would have blocked Peter Mandelson from serving as the UK’s ambassador to Washington had he known he failed security vetting, David Lammy tells me. The deputy PM also says: - it was “inexplicable” that Oliver Robbins opted to leave Downing Street in dark over outcome. - he was “shocked and surprised” when he first learned on Thursday what had happened. - neither he nor his advisers at time he was foreign sec had known about – or asked for information on – vetting process or its conclusions
English
1.8K
126
466
303.6K
Andy retweetledi
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh@thatbloodyMikey·
Petitions, peaceful protest & asking politely, Latest:
Michael Walsh tweet media
English
56
913
1.9K
38.1K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@MiniJet10 @DerbyChrisW Wish the whole lobbyist bs could be banned, if they want to help MPs they should donate the money to charity in their constituencies ffs.
English
0
0
0
19
Andy retweetledi
Chris Williamson
Chris Williamson@DerbyChrisW·
Well, well, well. I've just received an email from the House of Commons saying the govt won't support a public inquiry into pro-Israel lobbying activity our politics & democracy. Not surprising considering how many cabinet ministers and MPs are bankrolled by pro-Israel lobbyists
Chris Williamson tweet mediaChris Williamson tweet mediaChris Williamson tweet mediaChris Williamson tweet media
English
335
3.7K
6.6K
110.6K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@DrEliDavid We probably wouldn’t get on this case, I think she has been magnificently brave and cognisant of what her electorate actually feels, same as Spain, I wish @Keir_Starmer would have the same backbone and sack his SPADs
English
0
0
1
134
Dr. Eli David
Dr. Eli David@DrEliDavid·
Meloni is the most pathetic world leader right now. Nobody had any expectations from Macron or Starmer, but she lied to her voters and is doing the exact opposite of what she promised.
English
2.5K
5K
23.9K
471K
Andy
Andy@gtempx·
@narindertweets When electorate have the outcome of an official enquiry we can decide, it won’t be based on some hearsay on X.
English
0
0
0
38
Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets·
So, Starmer WAS telling the truth. Can we all calm down now..
Alex Wickham@alexwickham

BREAKING: Sources say Olly Robbins felt bound by the rules of the security vetting process NOT to tell the PM, No10 or the foreign secretary about the concerns raised about Mandelson That means it appears No10 WERE in fact unaware he had issues with his vetting And sources say in fact Mandelson DID NOT simply fail his vetting. Instead issues were raised and the FCDO security team and ultimately Robbins had to make a decision on whether to grant him DV clearance. It was their decision and there was no “overturning,” sources say As @SamCoatesSky reports via former security official Ciaran Martin, Robbins was prohibited from sharing information about what happened with anyone outside the FCDO security team Sources say the point of the vetting process is that it is extremely invasive and people who go through it must be confident they can tell the whole truth and not have highly embarrassing information about their personal lives leak or be spread around colleagues That means the circle of people allowed to know about what happens in each vetting case is very small and the information is highly privileged The decision on whether to approve Mandelson’s clearance, according to the vetting rules, is taken by a small team of FCDO security officials and ultimately Robbins, sources say Under no circumstance is Robbins or that team able to share the details of the vetting case with No10 or anyone else, sources say. Robbins felt he could not share it with any minister or private office, sources say It appears the PM and No10 were unaware of how these rules were perceived by Robbins and FCDO, and think he should have told them. Allies of Robbins think it is unfair he was sacked But crucially it appears right now that Robbins did not tell No10 and they were actually in the dark about all this until Tuesday. What an unbelievable mess

English
1.9K
512
2.2K
176.7K