
booooooooooo
1.3K posts


@Thuso1Africa @Nicole_Barlow1 Prove him wrong. Oh wait, that would be impossible.
English

@Nicole_Barlow1 Of course you would spill that nonsense, you’re British, the co-founders of slavery. And by the way, stop lying in your profile that you live in South Africa

English

Do you want to know the funniest thing??
The funniest thing is that if they both got into a fight the black guy will beat the hell out of the white guy😂
Alexander 𖤓 Nietzschean Vitalist@UbermenschMind
"Race is a social construct"
English

@crankycartoons Buddy, we couldn't defend ourselves against an army from Barbados.
English

Fuck off, fascist. You dumb cunts are already grinding your own military into the dirt in the Middle East, and you think you’re in any position to invade Canada? 😏
You won’t be able to handle somewhere like Saint Martin by the time this is over. Iran is already dog walking your people, and you’re out here talking about turning Canada into the 51st state? That’s not strategy, that’s full-blown MAGA mind-rot fantasy!
You’ve gutted your own military chasing bullshit wars for your fascist, imperialist, compromised Epstein overlords, and you’ve swallowed every drop of their Kool-Aid. There is no “your army” anymore, just a machine burning itself out.
Canada isn’t some foreign land you can roll over. We look like you, sound like you, know your culture, and we’d be inside every part of your system fast. You’d never know a day of peace for the rest of your miserable, stinking life.
Invading Canada would be like you cutting off your own right arm and handing it to us so we can beat you in the face with it nonstop. Your trade, your economy, your supply lines are all tied directly into us. You don’t conquer that, you collapse with it.
You try this and the world you know is gone. Economic collapse, internal chaos, nonstop pressure you’re not built to handle. Hell, it’s already happening and you have no idea! 🤪
You like guns, so do we, and your cult has made it clear we’re not friends anymore.
So go ahead, asshole. Bring it on. See what happens.
Sorry, not fucking sorry.
Hal Turner@Hal_Turner_Show
@crankycartoons Think this is bad? Wait until we invade Canada. You limp-wristed girly-men, sissy-Marys have a lot to say. But you have no way to back up what you say. You will become the 51st state. Prepare yourselves.
English

@TheBlaccountant @trouble_man90 Lol. People who rob pregnant women, dont go to heaven.
English

@Johnfdvk @Boolin32 @MatTalksTooMuch @trouble_man90 No, they don't. That would require a minimum of two functioning brain cells.
English

@GovPressOffice Lol. He's crying, because hes a failure and a waste of genetic material.
English

People forget that Vice President Kamala Harris is from the Bay Area
She was DA, AG and Senator watching what Silicon Valley was up to
She was an early voice warning about placing guardrails on the nascent technologies like AI
In 2019 she warned us
Kamala Harris@KamalaHarris
Long before today’s ruling, we knew social media was harming our young people. Teens, parents, advocates, and even casual observers begged tech and elected leaders to take action. While we applaud this decision, we have much more work to do to protect young people online and support their mental health and wellness.
English

@JohntKnotwell Eat my ass bitch I’m a communist
English

I thought they were “The most attractive race” ????? What happened??
𝖃𝖊𝖓𝖔@xenobangs
i’m shadowbanned bc bro wtf is this
English

@guyleguy9 @jpl_black @ItsDeanBlundell Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…
English

You dumb fucks aren’t fighting for religious freedom. You already have that. Too much religious freedom actually.
All of your churches should be taxed next and if you don’t engage in religious institutional hate speech, you have nothing to worry about “Ned”.
Ned Kuruc@NedKurucMP
🚨BREAKING🚨 Bill C-9 passes to the Senate. I voted against it and will always fight for religious freedoms.
English

No, "religious institutional hate speech" isn't a defined legal term in Bill C-9 or the Criminal Code—it's informal phrasing from the post.
Bill C-9 repeals the old religious-text defense for wilful promotion of hatred (s.319) but clarifies that religious statements are protected unless they intentionally promote "hatred": intense vilification or detestation of an identifiable group (not mere offense or criticism).
Your hypothetical would be evaluated case-by-case on intent, context, and whether it crosses that high threshold against a religious group.
English











