booooooooooo

1.3K posts

booooooooooo

booooooooooo

@guyleguy9

boooooo

Katılım Ocak 2026
28 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
Thuso van Zyl 🇿🇦
Thuso van Zyl 🇿🇦@Thuso1Africa·
@Nicole_Barlow1 Of course you would spill that nonsense, you’re British, the co-founders of slavery. And by the way, stop lying in your profile that you live in South Africa
Thuso van Zyl 🇿🇦 tweet media
English
49
12
414
10K
Cranky Canuck 🤘🥶
Cranky Canuck 🤘🥶@crankycartoons·
Fuck off, fascist. You dumb cunts are already grinding your own military into the dirt in the Middle East, and you think you’re in any position to invade Canada? 😏 You won’t be able to handle somewhere like Saint Martin by the time this is over. Iran is already dog walking your people, and you’re out here talking about turning Canada into the 51st state? That’s not strategy, that’s full-blown MAGA mind-rot fantasy! You’ve gutted your own military chasing bullshit wars for your fascist, imperialist, compromised Epstein overlords, and you’ve swallowed every drop of their Kool-Aid. There is no “your army” anymore, just a machine burning itself out. Canada isn’t some foreign land you can roll over. We look like you, sound like you, know your culture, and we’d be inside every part of your system fast. You’d never know a day of peace for the rest of your miserable, stinking life. Invading Canada would be like you cutting off your own right arm and handing it to us so we can beat you in the face with it nonstop. Your trade, your economy, your supply lines are all tied directly into us. You don’t conquer that, you collapse with it. You try this and the world you know is gone. Economic collapse, internal chaos, nonstop pressure you’re not built to handle. Hell, it’s already happening and you have no idea! 🤪 You like guns, so do we, and your cult has made it clear we’re not friends anymore. So go ahead, asshole. Bring it on. See what happens. Sorry, not fucking sorry.
Hal Turner@Hal_Turner_Show

@crankycartoons Think this is bad? Wait until we invade Canada. You limp-wristed girly-men, sissy-Marys have a lot to say. But you have no way to back up what you say. You will become the 51st state. Prepare yourselves.

English
107
91
692
23.8K
ᴅᴏᴜʙʟᴇ-🆁
ᴅᴏᴜʙʟᴇ-🆁@Naam_Hi_Kafi_H·
Unpopular Opinion : An average Brown Girl looks More hotter than the likes of overhyped Ana de armas, Sydney Sweeney and BILLIE EILISH etc.
ᴅᴏᴜʙʟᴇ-🆁 tweet media
English
3.7K
279
3.3K
377.2K
Tim
Tim@trouble_man90·
The Druski skit is a call for action. Black people have allowed so much disrespect over the years that when we give a tiny bit of it back, they meltdown. We need to start not just matching energy, but responding times 100. That’s the only way they’ll learn.
English
263
587
4K
57.9K
Governor Newsom Press Office
Governor Newsom Press Office@GovPressOffice·
MAGA thinks masculinity means never feeling anything. They hate when men have hearts. Don’t listen to them. Real men show emotion.
Governor Newsom Press Office tweet media
English
660
466
4.6K
66.2K
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Transphobes are a much bigger risk to this planet than trans people
English
306
298
1.9K
23.5K
Qondi
Qondi@QondiNtini·
People forget that Vice President Kamala Harris is from the Bay Area She was DA, AG and Senator watching what Silicon Valley was up to She was an early voice warning about placing guardrails on the nascent technologies like AI In 2019 she warned us
Kamala Harris@KamalaHarris

Long before today’s ruling, we knew social media was harming our young people. Teens, parents, advocates, and even casual observers begged tech and elected leaders to take action. While we applaud this decision, we have much more work to do to protect young people online and support their mental health and wellness.

English
92
773
2.5K
94.4K
straw hat sal she/her
straw hat sal she/her@ChairladyLove·
Charlie Kirk jokes never get old, and neither will he
English
144
3.7K
39.7K
440.8K
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, "religious institutional hate speech" isn't a defined legal term in Bill C-9 or the Criminal Code—it's informal phrasing from the post. Bill C-9 repeals the old religious-text defense for wilful promotion of hatred (s.319) but clarifies that religious statements are protected unless they intentionally promote "hatred": intense vilification or detestation of an identifiable group (not mere offense or criticism). Your hypothetical would be evaluated case-by-case on intent, context, and whether it crosses that high threshold against a religious group.
English
2
0
0
28