Firecracker_Blues

1.6K posts

Firecracker_Blues banner
Firecracker_Blues

Firecracker_Blues

@hackney_diamond

A middle of the road opinion that no one finds offensive or challenging.

London, England Katılım Haziran 2022
72 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
rhodri thomas
rhodri thomas@rhodrit11743435·
@darrengrimes I’m working in a house of some one who works for the home office. Get ready to expect over 30,000 Iranians early next month on a 6 month permit
English
3
1
7
361
Darren Grimes
Darren Grimes@darrengrimes·
🚨 I’M LEAKING THIS HOME OFFICE LETTER The Home Office is forcing another 150 asylum seekers onto County Durham without asking a single resident. They’re reversing our pause, ignored our councillors, and ignored the fact that the North East is already at 162% capacity. Labour views the North as nothing more than a cheap landfill for their failed open-borders experiments. This is the thanks we get for voting in Labour MPs!
English
121
1.4K
3.6K
48.1K
Firecracker_Blues retweetledi
Jack Dart
Jack Dart@JackWDart·
American-style attacks on women's reproductive rights are already happening in Britain, funded by the same organisations, the same money, and with direct links to Nigel Farage.
English
36
232
409
3.6K
Rose Smith
Rose Smith@itsrosesm·
I don’t care about being called racist. I want my country back. Deport them all.👊
English
184
715
8.4K
51.8K
Angry Jan 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Last night me & the gals had a day out in Londonistan. A person on the tube told me to stop eating my Crème egg because it was offensive to her . So Christian chocolates are now harem in my country ?? 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
GIF
English
1.2K
25
378
291.2K
Franza & Teutonia
Franza & Teutonia@NToasts·
@hackney_diamond @KateShemirani Yes sure, when the nazis were spreading propaganda pictures and videos of Jews living happily in nice settlements in Poland, that took away from the reality of what was really happening. The wording and presentation of a law doesn't change the raw evil its actually perpetuating
English
1
0
0
13
Kate Shemirani
Kate Shemirani@KateShemirani·
Remove the law, and you remove the boundary. The house of frauds. A house full of eugenicists ? Ask yourself, is this murder? That is the real issue being debated. I’ve worked in these wards. Late-term procedures are not abstract, they are complex, serious, and carry real consequences. If legislation changes, the public deserves absolute clarity on what that means in practice. It means dismembering a full term baby, but if it were born naturally, that baby would survive. My first job was in a gynaecology ward. Providing suction terminations up to 12 weeks. It’s horrific. It rips the baby to pieces. Up to 24 weeks… men are born alive and left to die in the sluice and then there are later abortions and it’s gruesome . We’re talking dismembering. We’re talking puncturing the skull and suctioning out the brain tissue. Now, ask yourself again… Is this murder? Because once the line is blurred, it cannot simply be redrawn.
Kate Shemirani tweet media
English
234
962
2.3K
25.2K
Luke
Luke@GoodSo57478·
@davidfoxon25 @TRobinsonNewEra Telling people who arrive to "respect our UK laws" isn't racist, no matter how you try to paint it.
English
1
0
6
153
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
A young PE teacher who taught in County Durham has lost his career for "wrongthink" He posted migrants should “respect our laws or leave” on social media, and banned from the profession by the Department of Education. This despite an independent teaching panel clearing him, seeming it "not racist", before someone at the DoE jumping in to overule and ban him from teaching!
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
552
3.7K
14.2K
216.6K
Barbara Davies
Barbara Davies@Barbara76057139·
@TRobinsonNewEra This is ridiculous. Five 'innocent' words & his career is over. I am appalled & I don't care what anyone thinks, but ever since 2 tier Kier entered No. 10, Britain has drastically changed. Its not good.
English
2
0
8
336
Firecracker_Blues retweetledi
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Britain is 6% Muslim. Germany 5%. France 10%. Sweden 9%. Belgium 7%. At this rate of Islamic conquest, Europe will be majority Muslim sometime around the year 2847. I’d pencil in some mild concern for around 2600 and see how things look then. Now. The refugees. Since someone asked who’s paying for all this. Let’s follow the money back a bit further. America invaded Afghanistan, spent 20 years there achieving absolutely nothing, then left in such breathtaking chaos that people were literally hanging off aircraft. It then invaded Iraq over weapons that turned out not to exist, killed somewhere between 150,000 and a million people, and converted a functioning country into a sectarian hellscape. This is before we even get to the drones over Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. The people washing up on European shores are, in very large part, the direct human wreckage of American foreign policy. America created the disaster. Europe is housing the survivors. And America is on the internet asking why Europe keeps letting people in. Remarkable cheek, really. As for eliminating indigenous culture: the United States actually eliminated its indigenous people. Deliberately. With rifles and government paperwork. Europe took in Syrian doctors. These are not comparable situations, and pretending they are requires a truly heroic indifference to history. The culture is fine. France still has the cheese. The Louvre is still there. Bach is still there. Nothing has been eliminated except, apparently, the ability to read a percentage.
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav

Britain, Germany, Belgium, France and Sweden are in a race for which becomes the first Islamic country in Europe. They just keep importing more and more fake refugees every chance they get. Who is paying for this intentional elimination of the indigenous people and culture?

English
922
2K
10.8K
798.7K
bu/ac
bu/ac@buperac·
I took my kid to an afterschool activity. It’s about a 10 minute drive. On my way I counted: 8 Range Rovers 7 Mercedes GL SUV 4 BMW X series SUV 4 Audi SUV 3 Tesla SUV 1 Aston Martin Car All immigrants. All brand new. I saw 2 white people my entire drive. F150 couple years old Toyota Tacoma probably 10 years old What the fuck is going on here?
English
2.4K
2.6K
21.7K
1.2M
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@Landeur Oh for fuck sake, it’s 1% of the Sun readers. The amount of times I’ve seen this regurgitated bollocks today is truly telling of the people that fuel this fake outrage.
English
0
0
9
65
Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
If a baby is born 1 month prematurely, and I suffocate it, that is murder. However, a mother can now 'abort' her child at 8 months in the UK and face no legal consequences. This was passed as law, despite only 1% of the public supporting it. Is this democracy? Really?
Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 tweet media
English
262
1.1K
5.1K
74.8K
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I’ve been called racist and islamophobic hundreds of times today for outlining Restore Britain’s policy on banning halal slaughter, the burqa, sharia law, cousin marriage and plenty more. I want to be really clear about our party’s official response. We do not give a shit.
English
3.6K
17.1K
123.4K
4.2M
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@LilaGraceRose Maybe that’s due to people who write about using aborted babies as fuel for heat on social media. Whilst sharing disgusting distortions of truth. Have a word with yourself.
English
0
0
1
45
Lila Rose
Lila Rose@LilaGraceRose·
This is real. Our society has become so desensitized to the value of human life that we treat aborted babies’ bodies as fuel to heat hospitals. Demonic.
Lila Rose tweet media
English
282
805
2.3K
50.7K
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@FemApologetics @DVATW In your generalised sweeping statement? No, the law still applies. In absolute, extreme circumstances, on a case by case basis, a woman will not face legal consequences if essential criteria is met. Massive difference.
English
1
0
0
12
David Vance
David Vance@DVATW·
The UK Government accepts that a woman can abort a baby at any point in her pregnancy up to birth without any legal consequences. We are no longer a civilised country.
English
43
113
929
6.9K
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@panonse @DrCalumMiller She’d be charged for concealment of a birth, perverting the course of justice, concealment of a body and potential homocide related offences.
English
0
0
0
10
Panonse
Panonse@panonse·
@hackney_diamond @DrCalumMiller She was charged under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, one of the two acts that will no longer apply following this amendment. It's a lot to do with current changes.
English
1
0
2
21
Dr. Calum Miller
Dr. Calum Miller@DrCalumMiller·
It is very simple. If you kill your son or daughter, you are a murderer and should go to jail. It does not matter whether your child has been born or not. Sarah Catt, who killed her unborn baby at 39 weeks, should be in jail. To remove all penalties is inhumane.
Dr. Calum Miller tweet media
English
36
149
973
8.6K
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@DrCalumMiller The amount of bullshit misinformation and emotive spin on Twitter today is absolutely outstanding. Nice to see so-called doctors are also playing their part in distorting the truth too. Unbelievable.
English
0
0
0
82
Dr. Calum Miller
Dr. Calum Miller@DrCalumMiller·
It is not legal for a woman to kill her unborn child at 39 weeks It will be legal under this new law If you don't call that legalisation you are a fundamentally dishonest person
English
14
62
482
6.3K
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@gracebrod1e No it’s fucking not, Denise. Have you actually read the legislation? I’m going to go with, absolutely not.
English
0
0
3
31
Denise Findlay 💚🤍💜
This is not to protect women This is to allow sex selective abortions up to birth We know women will be coerced. And suffer terrible trauma and pain Britain has become an evil country
Right To Life UK@RightToLifeUK

💔BREAKING: On a sad & shameful day for our nation, the House of Lords has just voted to allow abortion UP TO BIRTH to be introduced into law. This extreme proposal will endanger women & threaten the lives of viable unborn babies.🧵1/

English
33
93
314
5K
Firecracker_Blues
Firecracker_Blues@hackney_diamond·
@WorldByWolf *1% of The Sun readers support. Probably because these people haven’t bothered to educate themselves around what the changes to legislation actually means. Context matters.
English
0
0
0
68
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@WorldByWolf·
Why would the government enact a law that only 1% of the public support? The answer to that is the same as why they’re introducing assisted dying, forced mass third world migration on us, and legalised abortion in the first place. They’re pushing a genocide against Europeans.
Wolf 🐺 tweet media
English
87
618
2.2K
17.7K