
Its NOT either/or. We should move to renewables and nuclear, but as long as gas remains part of the mix we should use our own resources, they are less carbon intensive to extract and transport and cheaper. We have enough for the transitional period.
Heritage Market Socialist
61 posts

@herimarksoc
Economic Socialist 🛠 👷♂️🚩, Cultural Traditionalist ✝️👨👩👧🏠, Enemy of the Open Society and the Congress for Cultural Freedom

Its NOT either/or. We should move to renewables and nuclear, but as long as gas remains part of the mix we should use our own resources, they are less carbon intensive to extract and transport and cheaper. We have enough for the transitional period.





I am genuinely perplexed as to why some on the right take this oaf seriously.



@AcademicAgent_X Why do you, and much of the 'non-Zionist Right', remain climate change deniers? Surely you're suspicious of those who push the 'anti-net zero' line, given the fossil fuel lobby funding?
















80% of buses are electric in China. This has nothing to do with Net Zero, its all about energy security. We need to be a lot less ideological about the energy mix - if we make it lets use it, wind. nuclear, oil, gas or solar.



