HEXscout

It’s always sad to see how difficult simple thinking seems to be for so many people. You have the grand vision of becoming number one in your field? Then you have to bust your ass under difficult conditions… welcome to reality. And if after four years — despite the billions of dollars sacrificed for your vision — you still can’t even deliver the most basic foundation, like for example a bug-free explorer for your chain, then who with an actual brain is supposed to take you and your vision seriously? Our dear founder doesn’t even understand the significance of a cross-chain stable token like hUSDC being handed to him on a silver platter, yet he still refuses to provide it with a stable pool on the chain. Good grief — the outside perception of our ecosystem is one of pure mediocrity because so far it has been managed in a mediocre way. But I’m tired of repeating myself… Either @RichardHeartWin eventually understands it, or he’ll continue to drown in the concentrated retardation of his ecosystem. It’s really that simple. You don’t need to be Nostradamus — you just need enough economic understanding to count to three.

@hexscout @RichardHeartWin @VitalikButerin Recall that RH is going through a few legal hassles. Apart from beating the SEC, there was the Interpol charges and tax dispute with the Finish government… Why don’t you come up with a 4 year roadmap?

How it works, @RichardHeartWin? Take a look at @VitalikButerin. Starting with something as simple as the word “roadmap” would be an easy first step. “bUt nObOdY cAn PuBlIsH a RoAdMaP fOr PuLsEcHaIn BeCaUsE pUlSeChAiN iS dEcEnTrAlIzEd.” Nonsense. The PulseChain community can absolutely publish a non-binding, technical roadmap (subject to change).

@CossackHEXican @RichardHeartWin Read the history properly if you don’t want to keep getting stuck hallucinating your own interpretations. We won’t keep repeating ourselves. Everything has already been said.

@hexscout @RichardHeartWin You guys had a great portfolio manager… And then you abandoned it! You didn’t even bother to leave it in a working state!!! And then you have the gall to criticize and castigate RH for not having a “roadmap”…whatever that is supposed to mean!?!?!? Really poor form!

When will you finally wake up, @RichardHeartWin?

@bretep @Apple That’s exactly how every developer on PulseChain feels! What goes around comes around I guess.

Was reviewing my internal communications with @Apple this past week. Still amazes me that I was a good actor and received zero compensation for finding and reporting this extremely critical security vulnerability. No AI, just real intelligence.

...which is a complete waste of time and money... while what the ecosystem actually needs, in order to stop losing trust due to the lack of a real foundation, is to rebuild trust and belief again, completely independent of price action. Everything has been explained to @RichardHeartWin multiple times already. We wrote about this extensively and very clearly throughout the second half of 2025. He would just need to finally understand that it's foolish to keep doing the same things while expecting different results... and that it's long overdue to start taking the paths that have been right in front of him all along.

@hexscout @RichardHeartWin Wake up from what???

@Tobiwan_Hexobi @RichardHeartWin ONE sensible approach, yes. At least if he treated the guests respectfully, even if he considered their statements stupid.

I had an epiphany. We’ve had it all wrong. Although I’d love to see @RichardHeartWin live streaming and doing interviews again I think the ultimate would be for HIM to host a podcast inviting guests to share his immense knowledge of cryptocurrency and other topics. I think he would be an incredible HOST instead of relying on being just a guest.

That’s hardly surprising ;). People with IQ eventually move on once they realize leadership isn’t willing to listen... let alone lead with intelligence. We’ve been saying @RichardHeartWin for many months exactly what needs to change, but apparently reading random bullshit on X matters more to leadership than actually addressing the real issues. Zero visible progress. Very unfortunate. (Ah yes, of course... “PuLsEcHaIn HaS nO lEaDeRsHiP, iT’s ReAl DeFi ” 🤡) It’s still not too late if the ecosystem would finally start listening to and following the people who actually matter and know what they’re doing, but an unnecessary amount of damage has already been done. And frustrated “retard” salvos directed at the community, as understandable as they may be, move this ecosystem forward by exactly 0.0. 🏆

📣 We've just finished one of the most significant pieces of data analysis we've ever done, and you'll be shocked by the findings. As the price has moved down in the last 3 years, so has the average IQ of the community. An R² value of 0.981 indicates extremely high correlation between the 2 values. Full excel spreadsheet with raw data available by request.

@SIN3R6Y @CappyWallet 👍 i would love to see the best fiat onramp Rampnow in ypur wallet. That would be an onboarding gamechanger. x.com/OfficialRampno…

Cappy early website is up: cappy.cash Cappy X account: @CappyWallet Just wanted thank you guys for all the support on this. This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are a lot of things I plan to do in as short as possible of order. Couldn't do it without you guys. I'll be splitting updates between my personal / Cappy X accounts. I've been asked many times how people can help, I put some info on the site for now. Anyways, less talking more doing. The roadmap on the site is accurate as of right now. But I'm moving fast. I want this wallet to exist so I can enjoy it too.

🔥😍🔥 Real PulseChain Evolution

@RealTangoBango @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin x.com/hexscout/statu…

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin I miss HEXscout. Y'alls site was outstanding.

A post that should simply make you happy. @SIN3R6Y, an independent developer and a fan of @RichardHeartWin and PulseChain, is putting his full passion into building great infrastructure for PulseChain on so many levels. But while I feel deep gratitude that someone like Alex still exists on PulseChain after everything that has happened, I also reflect on the sadness that comes with the realization that PulseChain apparently needs some independent dev for infrastructure to move forward, while for three years now there has been absolutely ZERO notable chain development or even infrastructure expansion coming from the visionary and the developers of PulseChain. I have no idea whether anything is being worked on in the background and whether something will eventually come, but three years without the vision of wanting to get better and without any growth progress from the founding level is not just too little, it is a no-go. It has to change. If the founding circle actually thinks, “The Alexes of this world will take care of it,” then that creates an external perception that massively blocks the growth of PulseChain. But, thanks Alex! 👇 x.com/SIN3R6Y/status…

@FrankHexRynolds @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin x.com/hexscout/statu…

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Any chance Hexscout will get un paused at some point soon?

@CarlosB83132220 @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin HEXscout can live on and may gladly be improved even further. Unfortunately, we ourselves are now too deeply occupied with new things, but we are willing to sell it if someone truly appreciates four years of work on it accordingly. Feel free to reach out if interested.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin I miss your hexscout app....really hope i can track portfolios on it again 🙏

When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure. Not hype. Not another token. Not another chart. Infrastructure. Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable. PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one. So that’s where I focused. It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app. But a lot of projects depend on it. That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done. At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces. Software is like an onion. There are layers upon layers. Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks. Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it. And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them. That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on. That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases. There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong. But infrastructure has to be agnostic. If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.” That is not how we grow. A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer. That is not always easy. But I think it matters. And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things. I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction. But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that. The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all. If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better. That is how this should work. And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows. That is how you grow. That is how you get taken seriously as a chain. In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong. That is part of why I’m building Cappy. If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions. I am building the wallet I personally would want to use. That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible. There is no single perfect answer for everyone. But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it. A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really. I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time. Maybe I was wrong to expect that. Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning. Either way, it is what it is. At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist. That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else. That is fine. You can dislike the software I write and not use it. It really is that simple. But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important. People ask, “What about Sigma?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?” That is exactly the point. These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch. Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly. And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them. I am not randomly jumping between projects. I am building the layers that make the next layer possible. I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not. What I do know is that I am at least decent at software. So that is where I am putting my energy. I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing. Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No. Do I respect what he has built? Yes. Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes. Those things can all be true at the same time. I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from. Many of you support me, and I see that. I do not take it lightly. All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can. Not because everyone has to use it. Not because I think I am the answer to every problem. Not because I agree with every project. But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces. That is what I am trying to do. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.

@Wasps1969 @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Whoever understands math does not need to hope.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin ‘Hoping’ for bull runs isn’t the way forward…nor it is sustainable in the long term.

@Wasps1969 @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin I see that differently in this case. If a post like that helps more people sell, then that is a cleansing process we very much welcome. The stronger the foundation is cleansed in a bear market, the more spectacular the rise will be in the bull run.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Posts like this don’t help!! ‘Btw it’s thanks to people like him why the price is at this point’ might be lacking in self-awareness more than anything I’ve seen! 🤬 x.com/pulseprovex/st…

No, that is not just perspective. Those are facts. We, for example, have already left as contributors. One of the top 3 supporters of PulseChain during its first three years. Something like that must not happen to an ecosystem. It has to learn from things like this. If it does not learn, the same things will repeat themselves.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin That’s one perspective. I have another. I’m glad you’re still here and hope you’ll be very glad soon, my friend.

@JamRobJamRob @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin @LibertySwapFi Sorry, but I am not interested in developers who run a business on a chain for their own wallet. It is always nice when someone wants to build on PulseChain, always. But in this fundamental discussion, the actual issue is something completely different at its core.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Ever heard of @LibertySwapFi 😂😂 if you think RH gave up his ambitions to release all the things LS has you're wrong. You know why? Because they're all the same team!!!

@robinhofargo @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin No, buddy, for us, 2.5 years without progress, not even with a functional explorer, was simply one step too far. Not everyone has Alex’s level of tolerance, sorry. Some top people move on with their work when they constantly run into development roadblocks.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Ok buddy then do something. All you did was drop your website.

@CharlesDYOR @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin “On time” is long gone. PulseChain has let many races pass it by. PulseChain is only playing catch-up now. But that does not mean the potential to catch up is already lost. For that to happen, though, something would have to change. It is that simple.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin It’ll all come right on time.

@robinhofargo @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin Only retards think in prices. Whoever thinks in prices has understood nothing. Whoever thinks in terms of infrastructure progress understands the game that actually matters.

@hexscout @SIN3R6Y @RichardHeartWin In other words you mean: „price not goin up“ lol

But Alex, I am paying very close attention. Of course, people can look at all of this in very different ways. I look at it very soberly, from the perspective of a crypto user. And that is the perspective that brings growth. That is the perspective that creates word of mouth. That is the perspective that provides motivation. That is the perspective that creates the appeal of wanting to build on PulseChain because you can smell the future. I smell the future when I read your posts and see what you are working on. And that makes me happy.🙏 And that is exactly what is simply missing from the founder level.

I appreciate the kind words, but I would just like to make a note that if you think the official “devs” are doing nothing…. You are likely not paying attention. Things change, all the time. Maybe not as fast as we would all like. But I can see the changes. A lot of it is just not super user visible.