Aditya
22.1K posts
@honestreckoning
Crush Islamophobia, Go beyond Capitalism, Destroy Caste System, Private Property and the State. Minamalist Opinions.
The whole #TCS story is cooked due to jealousy. They can’t see or tolerate PROGRESSIVE MUSLIMS. Andhere ko hamesha raushni se khatra raha hai.
The TCS Nashik sexual/religious grooming case is a classic case of the failure of Indian secularism that has put the burden of modernity and decency on the Hindu while the Muslim is expected to be away from all demands of decency and modern secular standards. Fuck this societal asymmetry.
Honourable @RuhullahMehdi your take and comments on this please!
Acha lode, phir yeh tere jo baap hai, inka naam sabse popular kyun hai London mein? Radical Islam thodi hai, law and order problem hai ,london mein Jo Islamic grooming gangs kar rahi hain, woh radical thodi hai? Law and order hai. Gandu, sharm kar le.
"My position on Israel has nothing to do with the religion or ethnicity of Israelis. It has everything to do with decisions made by its govt that hurt my country" Tucker Carlson on being accused of antisemitism because he's been critical of Israel
Mark Bonnick, Arsenal's kit man of 22 years, was FIRED in 2024 due to public posts against the clear genocide in Palestine. Arsenal said they found his comments "there is ethnic cleansing in Gaza" provocative, and damaging the Club's reputation. Zionism. x.com/MrBlackFootbal…
Escalating from Suez to Waterloo Trump’s Three-Card-Monte Takes on the Chess Grandmasters By Saifedean Ammous The article argues the U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran may represent a historic strategic failure, comparable to events like the Suez Crisis or the Battle of Waterloo, which marked turning points in global power It claims the war was expected to be short, controlled, and decisive, but instead has become prolonged, costly, and increasingly difficult to manage Ammous suggests that stated objectives are not being achieved, and that escalation has not produced meaningful strategic gains A major theme is the changing nature of warfare, where inexpensive technologies like drones and basic missiles can effectively counter highly advanced and costly Western military systems This shift implies that traditional military superiority (based on expensive equipment) is becoming less decisive against decentralized, lower-cost strategies The war is described as consuming large amounts of U.S. resources, including munitions and defensive capabilities, potentially straining long-term readiness Ammous argues this depletion raises concerns about the U.S.’s ability to sustain or win a larger-scale conflict, particularly with a peer competitor such as China He highlights a psychological and cultural gap, where Americans are accustomed to dominance and therefore may misinterpret or overlook signs of failure According to the article, media and political narratives may obscure the strategic situation, reinforcing a perception of control or success The conflict is framed as potentially weakening U.S. influence in the Middle East, with regional actors becoming less dependent on or aligned with U.S. power It also suggests possible global economic consequences, including instability tied to conflict escalation and strain on the existing financial system Ammous connects this to a broader risk of decline in the U.S.-led global order, including institutions and the dominance of the dollar The escalation itself is portrayed as risky, potentially worsening outcomes rather than improving them, similar to historical cases where powers doubled down unsuccessfully Overall, the article presents the conflict as a systemic turning point, where technological, economic, and geopolitical trends converge to challenge long-standing U.S. dominance Read: open.substack.com/pub/saifedean/…
I know I shouldn’t say anything against Hinduism, but… what on earth is this? And we still wonder why we’re a third-world country.
