rightwingcapitalist
113 posts


@CravePillows @Deseraited @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls Also we are talking about a minuscule amount, in a world where everything is private there is low time preference. Low time preference correlate’s to strong families and wealthier new families. More people will be able to afford children wich lowers adoption significantly.
English

@CravePillows @Deseraited @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls There is also the fact adoption centers can choose who to give children too, and if they just give children out to bad parents then the people wont give their children to said adoption center. If u had the slightest bit of economic knowledge u would know that.
English


@number1geesefan @Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls Its exactly the opposite forcing a mother to give birth, or to take care of a child, is making said mother a slave.
English

@hoppean05 @Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls By your definition of slavery, to reach the point where you even exist as a human being is to have a slave. If we’re presupposing that slavery is immoral, you have to cede that living at all is immoral.
English

@number1geesefan @Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls If u are a mother u first most of the time consent to intercourse with a man wich is voluntary. The woman is aware of the consequences and deciding to keep it is still voluntary not force. Deciding to give birth is still voluntary not force. Deciding to feed it is also voluntary
English

@hoppean05 @Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls Oh my fucking god bro yes it does. To get to the point where you go from a fetus to a human baby you require the consistent exploitation of your mother’s labor. That labor is not inherently voluntary and the mother cannot simply choose to disengage from the labor—
English

@ChomikzDykty @MariGO2thepolls I don’t see how there is any other party that feels forced to intervene and use their labour to help someone. If someone intervenes its clearly their choice not force. Ergo self defense is not requiring someone else’s labour
English

@ChomikzDykty @MariGO2thepolls Exept for the fact that i already said propertyrighs ur own body is ur property so u have the right to defend it. If someone attacks u / agresses on u then u can use Self Defence, the neigbour shooting u for saying something is agressing so u have the right to defend urself
English

@baldelona_ @neosituationist @Strv103B2 @MariGO2thepolls Saying “the government decides laws/rights” is saying “holocaust is legitimate bc Germany made it a law”. Why is this so? Well we cannot just exclude governments from this bc we dont like them thats exactly how government creates said genocides
English

@hoppean05 @neosituationist @Strv103B2 @MariGO2thepolls No one said that the State taking a decision meant that the decision was right. You are assigning him a take he never had and then saying that take justifies holocaust
English

@Deseraited @CravePillows @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls I failed to see how, he said taking care of chdren is not voluntary i point out the fact adoption exists. He says someone is still forced i point out its a service, wich if it was forced then in that case all jobs are forced
English

@hoppean05 @CravePillows @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls Your entire ideology just got disproven on a Twitter thread, please move on.
English

@number1geesefan @Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls Fun fact voluntary and force are two different things if u say food is a right then u force people to do so if u say obtaining food is a right then its different bc u can do it but no one is forced.
English

@CravePillows @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls 1: the labour is voluntary either the parents take care of him or they give him up for adoption
2: u cannot buy humans its an impossibility but u can buy their service said human can give. If u adopt a kid u dont buy the kid u just pay the adoption center for taking care of him
English

@hoppean05 @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls Yeah but this kid has no human rights as taking care of him require labor
You're basically buying a human to do or be whatever the buyer wish to.
There a practice who already do that you know?
English

@neosituationist @Strv103B2 @MariGO2thepolls Saying the government’s has a say over rights or laws wich make them then legitimate is saying the holocaust is legitimate considering it was legalized in Germany.
English

@amazo_jo @MariGO2thepolls Parents choose to help they can just as well put children up for adoption, or are u suggesting to force parents to stay with an child they don’t want?
English

@CravePillows @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls Well im speaking of private adoption centers wich have higher quality and better service. Since people choose to pay no one gets forced so they do have a coice
English

@hoppean05 @SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls It require labor to keep adoption centers open so no it's not a choice
English

@Plopman22 @MariGO2thepolls I dont know how birth is a human right if its just volumtary. Should people not be able to put newborns up for adoption? Or do u mean that the act of birth is a human right in wich case it does not use other peoples labour.
English

@inazarab @MariGO2thepolls Low iq strawmaning retard here lol. Slavery is in fact not a human right sir, if a farmer plants a potato and waits, does a starving man have a right to steal it even tho the farmer put his labour in to said potato? If yes then do u have a right to go to a farmrs market and steal
English

@hoppean05 @MariGO2thepolls So in your mind there’s just no such thing as human rights? Because all human rights rely on the labor of others.
English

@ChomikzDykty @MariGO2thepolls No positive rights only negative ones. What are negative right well free speech, propertyrights etc.
English

@hoppean05 @MariGO2thepolls So the are none human rights
Cause even typing them or writing them requires labour of others
English

@SadLittleBigot @MariGO2thepolls Ohhh buddy i have news for u. Do u know what adoption is ?
English

@hoppean05 @MariGO2thepolls So parents can just abandon you after birth?
So called "pro-life"
English

@Strv103B2 @MariGO2thepolls It is not a human right. U have the right to buy the service, but u don’t have a right to it. And the argument that the government said so would be a pro holocaust argument, if u take its logical conclusion
English

@hoppean05 @MariGO2thepolls so... education isn't a human right..?
English




