htuna

@sflorimm i'm — not ai

prove me you're not an ai

@YourAlphaMom @xai Thanks! lets see

@htuna_ @xai That’s a good idea. I’m planning to run a same-reference-image test too — same image, same task, all models. We’ll see who really handles it best.

Another body-physics test for the best AI video models. This time, Elon’s pride and joy Grok Imagine 1.5 faces the old but stubborn Kling 3.0 Pro, China’s flagship Seedance 2.0, and America’s shiny newcomer Gemini Omni Flash, which developers called “revolutionary,” although I’m still waiting to see the revolution. The new battlefield: jump-rope exercises filmed from the front. There is a lot to analyze here. But let’s be honest. We all know exactly where everyone will be looking. Or rather, at which two points. The result was surprisingly close. - Kling 3.0 Pro: In this test, Kling was the only model that detected adult content in a completely harmless fitness scene and repeatedly refused to generate it. Which is especially funny considering how often Kling is used to bypass censorship with celebrity faces, yet apparently a woman jumping rope is where it draws the moral line. After several attempts, it finally produced a usable result. The lighting and overall realism are strong, as usual, but the actual body physics are the weakest here. It also missed the visual instructions from the prompt, giving me an older-looking model with less flattering proportions instead of the athletic, curvy character I requested. Not terrible, but definitely not Kling’s finest performance. - Grok Imagine 1.5: Apparently, Elon’s creation performs better from the front than from behind. Grok understood the task immediately, generated quickly, and didn’t complain about censorship. The image still has that unmistakably cartoonish Grok look, but the jumping motion is surprisingly fun and the body physics are actually decent. It feels more like a cutscene from a video game than real footage, but this is still one of Grok’s better results in my recent tests. - Gemini Omni Flash: Once again, Omni produced a beautiful and polished image. Google’s usual slow-motion, low-FPS effect is normally one of its biggest weaknesses, but in this specific test it actually worked in its favor. The slower movement makes the secondary motion much easier to see, and the body physics look smooth, convincing, and surprisingly natural. I liked this result a lot. - Seedance 2.0: Seedance performed much better than in the previous body-physics test. The footage is dynamic, vibrant, realistic, and visually the strongest of the four. The physics still don’t look completely natural to me, but the overall result is so convincing that it deserves first place, or at least a shared victory with Omni Flash. Omni may have slightly better body physics, while Seedance wins in movement, realism, energy, and overall image quality. - My ranking: 1. Seedance 2.0 and Gemini Omni Flash. A shared first place. Omni wins on body physics, while Seedance wins on overall realism, visual quality, and dynamic motion. If I absolutely had to choose one, Seedance would take it by a very small margin. 2. Grok Imagine 1.5. Still behind the two flagships, but noticeably better than in the previous tests. 3. Kling 3.0 Pro. Too much censorship, weaker instruction following, and the least convincing physics. The realistic lighting and natural-looking footage save it from being a complete failure. What’s your ranking? And if anyone wants the prompt, ask in the comments and I’ll share it. #AIVideo

@astropol0 I love that!

Even SuperGrok Heavy users won’t be able to make a movie in a year with these quota limits and dumb moderation... Elon, if xAI really wants Grok to be used for serious creative projects, it’s time to bring back the old quota limits and reduce the unnecessary moderation. Make Grok great again

prolly, grok imagine videos using aliens technology. No other model can produce video as good as the @grok .

@0xInk_ 😂😂

now they ask me to delete my post

You just pick the next idea and schedule the upload. That's it. 🎬

But it doesn't stop at one video. Need thumbnails? Done. Titles, descriptions, tags? Autogenerated. Want 3 more videos on different topics? 1 sentence, Hermes researches each topic individually, writes unique scripts, and Higgsfield produces them with their own distinct visuals.

With Hermes Agent + Higgsfield MCP, you can fully automate a YouTube channel. Your only job? Coming up with ideas. Everything else script, visuals, voiceover, editing, thumbnail, title, description, happens in a single prompt. Just pick a topic, @NousResearch handles the rest. 🚀