MrParaBULLic

Total2 First target hit almost perfectly before this dump. That’s w1 gone. Now for the real fun. Crypto $7 trillion dollar cap. Trump just fkt up the tradfi economy while taking the lead on the only real money game left. #crypto

Ok Fk this. Too much fuckery in VC groups. $God is fudging player stats and revenues. @InfiniGods $Shrap broke, fkt up build, won’t hit target for years. @playSHRAPNEL $Gun VCs traded out early rounds to T3 VCs raising FDV @GunzillaGames All $200m+ FDV finna dump on you

A “marketing stunt” they tried to hide and deny first… Shuuuuut TFup you 🤡 “We” DONT know why “they” named the account p2p. Another rug this muppet wannabe vc shills. @P2Pdotme will 1000% rug. It’s just a matter of time. They gonna burn through their big salaries 1st. 0

x.com/i/article/2038…

@iLiquidatebots Render looking bulish

Not only was @SBF_FTX a better allocator with infinitely better instincts he was an infinitely better builder. He built sht that was actually dope. With him out the way there was no contrast so the worst two scammers in crypto history went on a fkn Mona Lisa of a crime spree.

Crypto was infinitely better when @SBF_FTX was in play. Since this move imo @cz_binance and @binance went on its greatest extraction run ever wif @BNBCHAIN and @yzilabs and @binance launch pool extracting more $$ than ever before with memes, fees and ico dumps.

@coinmamba I'll buy as much SOL has you have, right now, at $3. Sell me all you want. Then go fuck off.

Funny how all of a sudden everyone is talking about @P2Pdotme just to rage bait. 9 out of 10 people commenting don’t even know what the project does, yet everyone’s suddenly an expert. Here are my 2 cents: I reached out to the P2P team mid last year, way before I even knew the @MetaDAOProject raise was going to happen. I found the project, was genuinely excited about what they were building and wanted to stay close. Since then, I’ve spoken to their founders regularly. When the ICO came around, we got convicted pretty quickly, the conviction was already there, and the MetaDAO raise gave us the opportunity to build exposure at very attractive terms with a strong setup given the ownership coin structure. We’re now among the biggest contributors in this raise. So yes, I might be biased on what comes next: Was the Polymarket trade by the team a stupid move? Yes, absolutely. Do I believe this makes them a shady, untrustworthy team? Hell no. There was no bad intention behind it. No one with any common sense would risk a $6M raise over $15K. Their genuine intention was to create what they thought would be a guerrilla marketing stunt, very much in the spirit of crypto natives and trenchers. The idea was to show such strong conviction in the sale that they’d even bet on themselves. This is exactly why they intentionally named the account “P2P team.” Otherwise you’d have to argue they’re the most incompetent insider traders of all time. Funnily enough, having spoken to this team several times, I’ve consistently been surprised by how transparent and honest they are compared to most founders I deal with. That hasn’t changed. Neither has anything changed about P2P being a great project with real product-market fit, real traction and solving a real problem in emerging markets. Nor has anything changed about the founding team being hardworking people that I trust. The only thing I might question at this point is whether they should replace their marketing team. Hope this perspective helps. I understand why people are upset. But I genuinely believe this is a small, stupid mistake on what will be a long and successful journey for them. This too shall pass.

A note on the Polymarket positions you've seen on-chain - the account named "P2P Team" is ours. We wanted to come out honestly. The capital came from our foundation account and all proceeds return to it. Here's the full picture. 10 days before our raise went live, we placed bets that we'd hit our $6M+ target. At that point we had one oral commitment from Multicoin ($3M) - no signed term sheets, no guaranteed allocations, nothing binding. We were betting on ourselves. We'd told the market we were raising over $6M. We believed we could. That bet was our way of backing our word with our own money at a moment when the outcome was genuinely uncertain. Over the following 10 days we made our case, secured commitments, and the raise closed at $5.2M - entirely from outside investors we don't control. We understand why this raises questions. Trading on an outcome you can influence erodes trust. We don't believe we were trading on a done deal, but we recognize reasonable people can see it differently. We named the account "P2P Team" deliberately - to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn't the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a "No Comments" stance! - that too is a fair criticism. All proceeds go back into our futarchy-governed MetaDAO treasury. We will be liquidating all positions in the next few hours and are putting together a formal company policy on prediction market trading going forward. One thing we want to be unambiguous about: MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject ) had zero knowledge of or involvement in these bets. We're genuinely excited to join this community and wanted to start on the right note - which means being straight with you about this.

Three venture Investors have gone public so far announcing their thesis and participation in upcoming $P2P sale on @MetaDAOProject - are you in anon? @shayonsengupta /Multicoins post : x.com/shayonsengupta… @sjdedic /Moonrocks post : x.com/sjdedic/status… @knimkar (Kuleen, Ex.Solana FDN's post) : x.com/knimkar/status… More funds are rolling in to compete for an allocation alongside retail 🫡 See you at the ICO in 16 hours - time for “WINNING”

If you believe in @virtuals_io then you believe in @virgen_official $VIRTUAL 🤝 $VIRGEN It’s written in the charts 😉