Ibn Solo

@Omaradation @MokshaMani @LFRedfoot @jacobin Which family is protective against. It's why none of you western leftist will ever be able to challenge and corporations and lead to class consciousness.

@Omaradation @MokshaMani @LFRedfoot @jacobin The mode of production changed and thus class relationships did. The family unit doesn't have the wealth accumuation you insist as the family unit cannot compete in industrialism and only when agricultural and fedual societies allowed them to. Capitalism ALWAYS breed alienation

Dating apps and sex-segregated online communities are intensifying resentment between the genders, while left-wing theorists increasingly adopt family abolition as a rallying cry. Is there a way out of our heteropessimistic moment? jacobin.com/2026/07/love-f…

@QueenMab87 You can do whatever you want but an injustice doesn't make it a class issue in Marxist terms.

I have had way too many men dismiss sexual abuse against rich/middle class women or non wealthy men deny they have the patriarchal power to sexually abuse women & get away with it. So yeah im going to push against sexual abuse as a class issue framing

That doesn't mean sexual objects. And what you posted is one reason for hijab. That doesn't mean hijab isn't worn because it's commanded from Allah.

@Xalkulify The hanafis disagree with ahad narration being enough evidence

إبراهيم النظام الذي كفره معظم المعتزلة وكان ينكر الإجماع والقياس كان يقول بأن خبر الواحد إذا احتفت به القرائن أفاد القطع جاء في العدة لأبي يعلى :" وقال إبراهيم النظام : خبر الواحد يجوز أن يوجب العلم الضروري إذا قارنه أمارة" وهذا منقول عنه في عامة كتب الأصول وهذا هو مذهب الرافضة أيضاً ! قال الطوسي في مقدمة الاستبصار:" وما ليس بمتواتر على ضربين فضرب منه يوجب العلم أيضا، وهو كل خبر تقترن إليه قرينة توجب العلم، وما يجري هذا المجرى يجب ايضا العمل به، وهو لاحق بالقسم الاول، والقرائن اشياء كثيرة منها ان تكون مطابقة لادلة العقل ومقتضاه، ومنها ان تكون مطابقة لظاهر القرآن: إما لظاهره أو عمومه أو دليل خطابه أو فحواه، فكل هذه القرائن توجب العلم وتخرج الخبر عن حيز الآحاد وتدخله في باب المعلوم، ومنها ان تكون مطابقة للسنة المقطوع بها إما صريحا أو دليلا أو فحوى أو عموما، ومنها ان تكون مطابقة لما اجمع المسلمون عليه، ومنها ان تكون مطابقة لما اجمعت عليه الفرقة المحقة فان جميع هذه القرائن تخرج الخبر من حيز الآحاد وتدخله في باب المعلوم وتوجب العمل به" وقال الشافعي في الرسالة :" أما ما كان نصَّ كتاب بيِّن أو سنةٍ مجتمع عليها فيها مقطوع، ولا يسع الشكُّ في واحد منهما، ومن امتنعَ من قبوله استُتِيب" وهذا يدل على أن مذهبه أن خبر الواحد الذي أجمعوا على صحته يفيد القطع ولا أعلم مخالفاً للشافعي في هذا بل نقل ابن تيمية اتفاق السلف على هذا المذهب في الأجوبة على الاعتراضات المصرية وادعاه ابن حجر مذهباً لجمهور الأشاعرة في النكت على ابن الصلاح فلا يهولنك ثرثرة منكري السنة ولا متأخري الأشعرية القائلين برد أخبار الآحاد في مسائل العقيدة ففي هذا الأصل نقض هرائهم فأخبار الصفات لها نظير في القرآن وكثير منها مما أجمعت الأمة على صحته حتى من يحرفه عن ظاهره

@glitterspacec @goodkey8movie88 Did she say it was exactly like this or the images exaggerated the nudity?

@goodkey8movie88 Once indoor plumbing became common, people gradually stopped using traditional Persian bathhouses. But some are still open if anyone wants the experience (especially men they still go quite often). Some historic ones, like the Fin Bath in Kashan, have been preserved as museums

you know that google is free right? it’s called a public hanmam and even my grandma used to use it 60 years ago

@ghoulhag The beach is for enjoying the ocean not for being scandalised by your degeneracy.

the concept of going to the beach when you’re scandalised by butt cheeks

@izs @keysmashbandit It's made up western pseudoscience

@keysmashbandit What the fuck are you talking about? Attachment theory was developed in the 1950s, applied to adult relationships in the 1980s, and the book you’re probably thinking of was published in 2010. No developments happened in the late 2010s. You are extremely and thoroughly mistaken.

Remember: adult "attachment theory" was developed in the late 2010s primarily as a form of intrasexual competition between psychology majors. You shouldn't allow it to propagate outside of that niche because it is an invasive species that outcompetes other relational frameworks

@artrockalter @godspeed_aflame Please stop the pseudoscience

@godspeed_aflame w/ Lasch instead of Zizek: kid in the first picture will develop anal neuroses and kid in the second picture will develop oral neuroses

I seem to recall Zizek pointing out how rather than being forced to comply against our will, we are now culturally pressured to actively participate in and enjoy our own subjugation.

@amsiseepy Basic tenants of what? Abortion is immoral unless dire need.

You're literally anti abortion, one of the most basic tenants, wtf kinda authority do you have calling anything misogyny lmao

@imody_777 You've watched too many meandering animes that can't tell a focused story and that's why you hold that opinion.

طلع الانمي ممتع ولكنه اقل مما توقعت جودة الرسم والألوان والإخراج والأجواء والموسيقى كلهم مضبوطين وفيهم تميز كبير عن باقي الانميات لكن كتابة الانمي فيها شيئ من السطحية يريد يحسسك بصدمة من البداية لكنه بالمقابل أهمل بناء الشخصيات وجعلهم مجرد دافع لا أكثر 7/10 Jaadugar Ep 1-2

@imody_777 @ii_maryy63159 Modernist bs

@ii_maryy63159 المشكلة بوجود العبيد من الأساس وليس بطريقة تعاملهم

أغرب شيئ في الانمي هو استماتته المتكررة بأظهار شراء العبيد يطريقة أيجابية ما ادري شنو الهدف او الرسالة اللي يريد يوصلها المؤلف لكنه شيئ ما عجبني ابدا بس صراحة انا مستغرب من الناس ان محد تكلم عن هذا الشيئ متحمس لاعرف ردة فعل الاجانب على هذا الشيئ لانها رح تكون خالية من العواطف

@PennyGongo @mechabowser @1BrownEyedGirI @stoydawg_00 You have it wrong it's property and mode of production that determines class. Not gender dynamic determine class.

@mechabowser @1BrownEyedGirI @stoydawg_00 Marx never said women are a distinct sex-class, however both him and Engels saw gender dynamics, primarily in the family, are the historical origin of property and class relations. ‘This latent slavery in the family, though still very crude, is the first property…’

someone made an interesting point to me once that war/violence is the root of misogyny, as it led to physicality being valued and thus those “weaker”, like women and children, being victimized and undervalued. This then sort of set the tone for things to devolve into patriarchy.

@ponyexperiments The father doesn't look down on the mother and neither does the daughter. This is the dumbest feminist analysis ever.

some of you ladies are very dumb

@ceruleannmist Women and capitalism

Marrying for freedom is like jumping from one cage to another. The only way to achieve true freedom and autonomy is to be completely self reliant financially and free from social obligations.

@floatingwordist Your argument makes zero sense. You're saying justify it creates a problem in interpretation? How? What is the problem you didn't state it. An interpretation itself can't be a problem.

@JumpRopeGazing @themostazezo That's not how Marxist define class

Women are not a class and you'd have to be high as a kite to think otherwise

@studmuffin339 @fayyadreturns @WhimsicalyMoose Better based on what?

@fayyadreturns @WhimsicalyMoose And yet the better opinion, even among hanafis is that ALL intoxicants are HARAM. Just because he arrived at the ruling doesn't make it true. Blind Taqlid is dangerous when we have prohibition from multiple hadiths.

No one will answer this. Is rum limincello, gin etc in a dessert halal if we follow this?

@jensensuther Cartesians don't avoid idealism. What are you smoking. So many do you don't even understand cartesian dualism and just attack it to be edgy, thinking it will solve all problems. Some forms of monism are poison and a springboard for a bunch of nonsense and oppression.

Marx was, ultimately, a Cartesian. He treats consciousness as the “theoretical duplication” of “real life-activity,” a position he held until the end of his life. His anti-idealism led him to conflate Bauer’s idealism with Hegel’s, and we’ve been paying for it ever since. 1/