Ib

@MichaelASerio2 Thanks for the feedback! Could you explain what parts were confusing? Was it the % signs? Was it the UI/Ux on mobile / pc? Would love to hear your feedback when you get a chance to take a deeper look!

@ibrahimlari7 I haven't studied this and at first glance found it very confusing. Will bookmark for later. However, there is a Wikipedia page that does the same thing for a much longer period and is easy to follow. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._econ…

The Economy Under Every President, In Data

I understand that data requires a lot of context. Let’s pls try be as objective as possible so that I can keep improving this product. At the end of the day I want this to benefit all Americans, not “push a narrative”. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

@HODLrevolt Haha Claude is great!

@ibrahimlari7 Loving the Claude UI entirely vibe coded aesthetic

@AmericaFirst60 How?

@ibrahimlari7 This guy is so full of Shit, it ain’t funny

@p662sbfko No lmao

@ibrahimlari7 You worked previously at the dept of labor right?

@bigbanonos Yeah Claude is great haha

@ibrahimlari7 Nice work Claude

We hear the Feedback! Introducing ‘Scenario Modeling’ Tab where you can view data and take out certain major crisis like Covid and the model will estimate what would have been otherwise. Again, the goal is transparency and data driven insight. Thanks for your attention to this matter!

@MrAmazingBoz I think you need to learn how to interpret data better. Inflation rose and as a result % change shows a decline relative to performance!

@ibrahimlari7 It didn't decline inflation rose.

@MrAmazingBoz Again in this example same logic, declined under Biden hence red arrow.

@ibrahimlari7 Here's real wages did Biden increase real wages or decrease real wages?does the arrow point up or down? We disagree in the way you're intentionally trying to deceive.

@MrAmazingBoz Clearly states here improvements or decline

@ibrahimlari7 There's no way you're serious! You're trolling right

@MrAmazingBoz Be clear with your point

@MrAmazingBoz I think we agree on the point but disagree with the interpretation of the data lmao

The inflation rate increased. That's why it's red with a down arrow on the site — it got worse. We agree. The -143% means the rate more than doubled (1.2% → 2.9%). That's bad for Biden. It's displayed as a decline in performance. Red = bad. We're literally showing the same thing you're arguing. Biden's inflation got worse. It's right there in red.

@MrAmazingBoz -143% clearly states it’s a decline not an improvement, across every single bar chart on the site any metric increasing or green is an improvement and anything red arrow is decline= bad. Maybe it’s a bit confusing?

@MrAmazingBoz Just like how it shows in the data/screenshot, looks like a 141% decline = bad

@ibrahimlari7 If you start with 1.4 cookies and end with 3 cookies, how many cookies did you gain?

@MrAmazingBoz Sorry I’m confused, we have the same data. Whats the misunderstanding?

@ibrahimlari7 Biden had a 1.6 point or 114.3% increase. He had a 1.5% decrease in real wages. Inflation was 1.4% when entered and 3% when left. With a 21.4% cumulative inflation rate. So either your dishonest, morally corrupt, or not that intelligent. Hate on Conservatives but do it better

You're making the exact argument for why we show inherited conditions on every metric. We agree — economies don't reset on inauguration day. But "Trump suffered from Obama & Biden's policies" is interesting because Trump inherited 4.4% unemployment, a rising stock market, and steady GDP growth. That's a pretty good hand. The lag argument cuts both ways. The site shows the data, you get to decide who deserves credit or blame. That's the point.

@ibrahimlari7 Retarded—aspects of the economy happen thanks to previous admins. Like the housing crash in 2008 is rooted in the 90s and the birth of subprime loans. Obama benefited from bush’s handling of 2008. Biden benefited from trumps economy. Trump suffered from Obama & Biden’s policies.

You're right that Congress controls budgets and legislation. That's actually one of the most important things voters don't understand — which is why we're exploring adding congressional context in a future update. But presidents sign or veto laws, appoint Fed chairs, set trade policy, and shape economic direction through executive action. Saying they have "less to do with the economy" is true in degree but not in kind. The goal isn't to give presidents credit or blame, it's to show what happened during their watch. How much was their doing vs Congress vs global forces? That's for the voter to decide.

@ibrahimlari7 presenting this data in this way, takes advantage of political division, while not providing any meaningful information. In reality, the president has less to do with the economy than the political parties in control of the house and senate making the laws and budgets.

@MyPasswordIsDog Yes he’s done a great job

@ibrahimlari7 So wages under Trump have gone up significant