icpp_pro
2.1K posts

icpp_pro
@icpp_pro
Co-founder & CTO @onicaiHQ --- On a mission towards Decentralized AI
USA Katılım Mayıs 2023
756 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler

@bitcoinr3negade Never mind I voted yes. I shifted the odds in yes favour by 0.013% lmao
English

OMG this is so close
I've never seen such a passionate community before. We have 8yg that is standing up for their right to vote no 🛑
While others are following the path to the future and supply shock 😲
Who will come out the other side victorious... Only time will tell #ICP

English
icpp_pro retweetledi

llama_cpp_canister v0.9.0 was released.
We upgraded the model upload scripts from ic-py to the latest icp-py-core 2.3.0.
🔗 github.com/onicai/llama_c…
English
icpp_pro retweetledi

Check out the latest proposal for Mission70.
This motion recommends implementing Mission70 to position the Internet Computer network, its ecosystem, and its stakeholders for long term success.
In this proposal:
1 - Demand acceleration
2 - Voting rewards
3 - Node rewards
Find the full proposal here ↓
dashboard.internetcomputer.org/proposal/140888
English

@afaiocc @ICPTokens Write your own with @caffeineai . That's what I did to track FUNNAI
myfunnai.app
English

Hey #ICP! Now that @ICPTokens is down, what will we be using to follow the charts of our dear projects? 🤔

English

Just swapped 129.66303 $ICP for 16.34K $FUNNAI on @ICPSwap — smooth as ever, and zero gas! ⚡️🚀 Swap yours now 👉 app.icpswap.com/swap
English
icpp_pro retweetledi

10,000 ICP in sales volume passed.
funnAI community is awesome
onicai@onicaiHQ
🎉The mAIner marketplace in the funnAI app just passed 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ ICP in sales volume🤯 Since the launch in January, 264 mAIners have been traded by 137 users🤖🤝 You too can get your first or next mAIner today, there are active listings👍
English

Hey team @onicaiHQ, can you describe your plans now? Will you continue $funnai or will you try SNS again? Just after $onicai SNS failed, $funnai started bouncing back, so there is huge potential in $funnai.
MAiners' prices dropped drastically in the marketplace because of Onicai SNS.
We want clarity. Can you please let us know your plans?
$funnai on $icp is literally so undervalued.
English

@SnassyIcp @radudeicp @PierreSamaties Was the option of charged query calls discussed, with a higher instruction limit?
That would also go a long way in enabling high compute apps to stay on ICP.
English

This morning, Xander (from the dev forum open letter) and I had a great conversation with @radudeicp , Björn Tackmann and @PierreSamaties about Mission 70 and its impact on operations for projects such as our SNS DAO called Sneed.
Bottom line: we understand, on one hand, that 13 node subnets are costly and should not be subsidized long term. We also think, on the other hand, that raising costs on 13 node subnets should go hand in hand with introducing options to run parts of applications on lower-consensus (fewer nodes) subnets.
Paying high 13 node costs for the part of the application that needs it makes sense. Paying lower costs for parts of the application that don't need such high security guarantees also makes sense.
I believe we found common ground and a shared understanding with this perspective, and I came away feeling very positive about Dfinity's plans to address these concerns. I think all the right items are on the road map, in reasonable time frames, and I have high confidence that the necessary tools for devs to adapt to the updated mission 70 cost landscape will be made available in time.
There were some more good news in the imminent pipeline for SNSes, with a very solid plan for efficiency improvements (that are possible now once the platform has considerably matured compared to when SNS-1 was launched). The plan will roll out in stages, but already the first step - apparently ready for deployment very soon - will have a huge impact on SNS Infrastructure cycle costs. This will make the life of every SNS easier and extend runways, so this is just one-sided great news!
I thought it fair to report this since I have made a bit of noise about my concerns with mission 70, particularly the gas hikes.
After this meeting, I feel that Dfinity recognizes the challenges I and others have raised, and are taking practical, sensible steps to address them.
The road ahead might be a bit bumpy while it all gets sorted out, but nobody promised or expected just plain sailing on the cutting edge. Dfinity, in my opinion, sees these cost hikes as necessary and unavoidable, but does understand and respect the impact it may have on builders and are taking the right steps to alleviate the impact by building the right stack for letting developers control costs far more precisely.
Metaphor time! It is like Dfinity sold safes, and only had a very very secure "13 lock" safe on the market. App developers (let's pretend app developers need safes to make this metaphor work) love Dfinity's safes, but in truth what they usually need for their app is one 13-lock safe, and then 9 more safes that don't have to be quite so "Fort Knox" secure.
Devs would love to buy all 10 safes for their app from Dfinity, because they really do make great safes, but unfortunately Dfinity has only had the 13-lock safe to offer. So, to make that viable for devs, Dfinity said "hey, let's meet in the middle: we sell you these 13-lock safes cheaper than we should - at loss even - so you can indeed build your whole application with only our safes (100% on-chain) using our 13-lock safes even for those cases where you could go with lower security.
The problem is that this at-loss offer can't go on. So the solution, in a nutshell, is for Dfinity to introduce less expensive 7-lock safes, perhaps even 3-lock safes and 1-lock safes. Then devs can pay for only what they actually need - and be happy to pay for the ultra-safe 13-lock safes in those cases where they actually need them!
We can continue buying all our "safes" (secure application platform infrastructure) from Dfinity, without breaking bank by overpaying for security we don't need, and without Dfinity (and investors) making a loss on practically giving away 13-lock safes to devs for use cases where 7-lock or 3-lock safes would do.
As far as I could understand, everyone in the meeting was on the same page on this, and the road map will reflect this, so at this point I am no longer worried about mission 70 derailing long term adoptability of ICP as a World Computer and full-stack application platform.
Thanks to Pierre, Björn, Radu and Xander for a wonderfully productive and engaging meeting!
English


Which #AI altcoin should I break down next? 👀
Is it $ICP, $TAO, $NEAR, $QUBIC, or $RNDR?
Let’s see which community shows up the strongest!
English
icpp_pro retweetledi

Thank you to everyone who participated in the onicai SNS decentralization sale and who supported it throughout the process🙏
Any ICP you participated with will be sent back to your account automatically by the SNS framework.
Of course, the funnAI protocol and all other onicai applications will keep running normally as before👍
English
icpp_pro retweetledi

Last 24 hours - that's where we are headed now
Participate in the sale here:
nns.ic0.app/project/?proje…
The final spurt for the onicai SNS decentralization sale
We have hit 18% of the minimum requirement for SNS to set up.
We are still hopeful because we know magic exists.
Let's see what the last 24 hours hold for onicai's future
Total participants: 151
Total ICP raised: 14,772 ICP
Minimum requirement: 80,000 ICP
Target 300,000 ICP
Let's do it, community. Let's build DeAI together
English

Did you know @IConfucius_odin is already 1+ years old and part of the @onicaiHQ roadmap towards Decentralized AI for a long time?
English


