hot dog
6.5K posts

hot dog
@ieprog
I measure value and transform data | Decentralization Advocate | Everything Enthusiast | Father
Virginia, USA Katılım Ağustos 2021
690 Takip Edilen871 Takipçiler

@user11011001069 @BigDrew369 @benjamincowen What about the example of water coming out of a hose? I can feel the force pushing back on me as the water leaves the hose and I'm not holding the hose it whips all around the place which wouldn't be explained by the force the water pushing on the air.
English

In a vacuum no.
The examples you showed via YouTube of a vacuum chamber have physical constraints, a box.
The thrust ONLY moves the rocket because that thrust is hitting the constraints of the box. If there are no constraints (an empty endless vacuum), then there can be no thrust.
Ask yourself, how can something provide propulsion or thrust in the absence of matter? How can something fly, glide, coast, or hover without buoyancy?
There are no constraints in space, just an endless never-ending vacuum.
In 1966, Jim Leblanc (no relation to Joey) barely survived a 3-door vacuum chamber in Houston. They almost killed the man in 10 seconds, as he immediately suffered hypoxia.
(If you can provide a single example of a human that has survived in a vacuum chamber with ANY type of suit, with photos, video, and documentation, I'd love to see it)
The Soyuz 11 (1971) killed all three crew members when they were ONLY 104 miles from earth. They didn't even leave the atmosphere of earth when they depressurized in "space."
That only lasted 90 seconds.
Earth's atmosphere extends 6,200 miles.
If you have any counter points, I'd love to address them 🤝
English
hot dog retweetledi

@BigDrew369 @user11011001069 @benjamincowen Lol, no it doesn't. Light plays tricks and we don't know the relative heights of the two locations.
Can rockets and outer space not coexist in a flat earth world view?
English
hot dog retweetledi

@BigDrew369 Rail guns rely on the same principles as superconductors which are still a pipe dream. Why not look at real life examples of missiles as evidence?
English

@ieprog No I just don't believe obvious liars 🐍
Didn't say you can't get an object to move that fast. Rail gun moves objects at thousands of mph
If it's so real, why have they been caught faking it so many times
English

10 times faster than a bullet?
Common sense says I don't think so

Mr. Nobody@MmisterNobody
🚨So let me get this straight, this supposed spacecraft will travel 25,000 miles per hour with people inside? And people really believe that’s possible?
English

@BigDrew369 @user11011001069 @benjamincowen You're putting a lot of faith in flat earth scientific research despite the volumes of experiments that contradict their results.
I think you should actually test this yourself before spreading secondhand information.
youtu.be/yRfDwkHPVeg?si…

YouTube
English

@ieprog @user11011001069 @benjamincowen There is no reactionary force
It's supposedly a vacuum
Demonstrate the movement in a vacuum

English

@BigDrew369 So we can get missiles to go that fast, but not rockets?
You ask great questions, but don't seem to be interested in understanding the answer.
English

@BigDrew369 @user11011001069 @benjamincowen That's not how rocket propulsion works. They release mass like a baseball player throwing a ball. That force pushes them in one direction while the mass they released goes in a different direction.
English

@ieprog @user11011001069 @benjamincowen No they can't
The air drifts away into the vacuum
Nothing to push off of
English

@BigDrew369 If people packed as much energy into guns that they do into rockets, that gun would blow up in their hand.
English

@BigDrew369 For further evidence, you can also reference ICBMs which all travel as fast or faster tha rockets.

English

@BigDrew369 Don't ignore that the energy/force propelling the rocket is over 1000x higher than the energy propelling the average bullet and the rocket is continually pushing vs a bullet with only the initial explosion.
All before considering drag on earth which doesn't occur in space.
English

@did8hurtu @adams_americus @ManaByte They don't need a medium to dump mass. If you threw a ball in space, you would be pushed in the opposite direction of the ball.
English

An opinion is liking pineapple on pizza. Saying the Moon landing was faked is not an opinion. It is a claim about reality, and reality comes with receipts. We have video, photos, mission logs, independent tracking from other countries, laser reflectors still sitting on the lunar surface, and astronauts who can explain every step of the mission in technical detail. That is not “your truth.” That is evidence.
Calling it an opinion is just the last stage of denial. It is what happens when someone realizes the facts are not on their side and decides to pretend facts are optional. They are not. The Moon landing happened. The evidence is overwhelming. And “I believe otherwise” does not magically turn science into a suggestion.
If your argument collapses the moment facts enter the room, it was never an opinion. It was just wrong.
Jaroslav Tavgen🇪🇺@TavgenJaroslav
@LizzardMFK @ManaByte Flat-Earthers also consider their beliefs "facts". You will never reach a consensus on what is a "fact". So everything is an opinion.
English

@did8hurtu @adams_americus @ManaByte The rockets are the chamber. They build up gas pressure and release it.
Think of it like the experiment where people add mentos to a bottle of coke.
English

@adams_americus @ManaByte So that's, gas pressure demands a container, and I know exactly what I'm talking about...
P and V got you all fucked up...
English

@user11011001069 @BigDrew369 @benjamincowen There's a reason rockets are used instead of planes for outer space. Comets prove that objects in space can move in a straight path unless influenced by another force.
Rockets get velocity and direction when we launch from Earth and thrusters help refine direction as needed.
English

@BigDrew369 @benjamincowen Show me a plane that can fly or even glide in a complete vacuum.
People think, seriously.
English

@BigDrew369 @user11011001069 @benjamincowen The answer is that the Earth doesn't really slow down, but there are imperceptible shifts due to the water/tides shifting around on earth(which we measure and use in atomic time).
English

@user11011001069 @benjamincowen Exactly 🎯
And even if you could speed something up to 25,000mph and have it stay in motion with no forces acting on it ... how would you slow it down? 😂




English








