Ian Glendon
138.1K posts
Ian Glendon
@iglen31
Editor-In-Chief @FP_Coverage | Editor: @FullPressNHL | Producer: @EyeTestForTwo | 🗣 @BigBadBruinsPod, @FPCRadioLIVE @FullPressRadio | #KOW
St Petersburg, FL Katılım Kasım 2009
12.7K Takip Edilen12K Takipçiler
@BoLoudon I hope so! We’re in a mess, thanks to Biden… Started by Obama.
English
Gen-Z has been watching EVERYTHING.
We've SEEN that President Trump has arrested more child traffickers than any other President.
We've SEEN that Trump has ENDED the persecution of Christians & more.
Gen-Z STANDS WITH Trump.
Gen-Z will be the generation that CONTINUES MAGA!🇺🇸
English
English
@JackBrian74 @mattvanswol Here you go. (And this was in January. More since.)
Look up David Gentile’s case.
docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU…
English
I AM SO FUCKING PISSED that I work 10+ hour days just to have 30% of EVERY DIME I MAKE sent straight to fake Somali daycares, fake hospices, massive fraud and illegals…
…only to pay MORE TAXES on cars, house, insurance for them, groceries
Can’t yall SPEND LESS MONEY????!!!!
English
@ipaytoomuchtax @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee The only people that seem to have gender confusion and think people believe men can get pregnant is MAGA. You’re just another in a long line of low IQ bigots who doesn’t know how to react with anything but hate towards something they don’t understand.
English
@iglen31 @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee Because gender confusion and pregnant men scream credibility. You’re a joke. Fk off.
English
🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The SAVE America Act has ADVANCED in the US Senate, 51-48
GREAT WORK, @BasedMikeLee!
KEEP PUSHING, PATRIOTS!
We can get this done! 🇺🇸
English
Shipped together with a pair of shoes!
LWB@sabnabdab
Hey MAGA, have you received your phone yet?
English
You know Gavin Newsom hates this.
He’s got too much ego to let it slide.
So, by all means, keep posting it. 😌
English
@ipaytoomuchtax @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee Um no…
Português
@iglen31 @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee That’s funny. You look dumb when you support democrats. Good luck
English
@ipaytoomuchtax @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee Not in State and Federal elections. You look dumb when you don’t do a basic level of research.
English
@iglen31 @Brandybrat @debunker @wolfie_ak @BenDover1752 @VictoriaZeev @nicksortor @BasedMikeLee Except in the blue states that literally allow illegals to vote.
English
Ian Glendon retweetledi
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok lol you’re legit delusional.
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok you don't have anything. You've been asked over 20 times, you provided nothing. 🤷♂️
You're in cope. Sorry you believed something without proof. But if you really cared about proof, you wouldn't believe it. You do. Showing your pretense about caring about proof was false 51
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok Again, the evidence is there in the documents you refuse to read or accept. At this point, you don’t want the truth and you’re just lashing out because of it.
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok like what? You saying there is an abundance of evidence is not proof 50.
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok It’s not an assertion. There is an abundance of evidence of it.
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok an assertion isn't proof 49.
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok You apparently missed the part about hacked democratic emails and DNC data… thehill.com/policy/nationa…
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok I literally already told you 48. Write what you are referring to in words. I've already read the Mueller report and didn't see anything. I asked you to say what you think I missed. You didn't say anything 🤷♂️ You have nothing. You're a dishonest hack
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok I posted the link with all the findings and proof you need. Again, you being ignorant of the facts is not a good defense. Keep clowning yourself.
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis @grok you've had 20 chances, you can't do it because you have nothing. You post a long link that doesn't show proof. Fail to write out in a post what you think is proof 45. Then ask grok, just say it yourself! You can't. Stop lying hack
English
@dttpeople @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis That’s not proof you dipshit lol
English
@iglen31 @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis my proof is this conversation, you believe in Russian interference beyond some social media ads. Don't require proof. 44.
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis Buddy… being ignorant of the facts is not a good argument on your behalf.
@grok, explain to this dope as he were five years old, all the findings of the Mueller Report.
English
you call other people stupid, but don't understand this?:
"it's your job to present the info. The link is not specific enough. You can't post a link and say "prove how you are wrong by reading this long link". No. 37. You need to say specifically what in the link you are referring to. Or copy paste the specific section. I'm open, I've literally asked you to do it! I've seen the Mueller report before, I don't need to read it."
don't understand. just don't get it, 43 for calling other people stupid, then not understanding simple statements.
You're projecting your insincerity vs stupid question, that's how you're acting, one or the other 🤷♂️
English
@dttpeople @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis No you didn’t. Where’s your proof?
English
@iglen31 @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis and i showed that was a false front, you don't care about proof it was pretention. 41.
English
@SylvainWathier @dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis What proof do you have?
English
Proof of daycares doing fraud with tax money.. empty day cares.. or no kids, a bunch of luxury cars.. some daycares were also completely empty.. we don’t need more proof… it’s clear as water… how much more proof so you need ? Is your brain capable of analyzing stuff ? I bet you love Gavin newson 🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis Your nonsensical ramblings. That’s what I don’t understand. I can’t decide if you’re trolling or genuinely this stupid. Either way isn’t good.
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis I said: what are you not understanding? 40 for not answering and 41 for asking a different question.
English
@dttpeople @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis No, I just want to to provide basic proof to support your claims. Keep running.
English
@iglen31 @SylvainWathier @LifecoachLinds @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis No, they require endless proof of claims they don't like and zero proof of claims they like, it's the fictitious front they have with themselves, they want to act like they care about truth, never cared, they always only cared about what was emotionally easiest for them. 🤡
English
@dttpeople @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis What am I being dishonest about?
English
@iglen31 @LifecoachLinds @SylvainWathier @lulzyouaregay @nickshirleyy @bourne_beth2345 @ucdavis I literally just told you. 39. what are you not undrstanding?
x.com/dttpeople/stat…
Josh Paul@dttpeople
You're such a clown. How do you live? Honestly, how do you pretend to be a reporter about serious things and then act so dishonestly? You'd have to be in cope 24/7 or built up these defense mechanisms, you've been wrong 34 times sir. More if I counted all. That's not legitimate. That's you in a boatload of errors because your processing AND your ideology or both far off the mark. You're supporting a false world view and when shown to you, you dodge and act like it didn't happen, literally the reason why I'm counting because you close your eyes and act like you didn't see them when they happened. They happened, 34+ errors and you're dealing well. Instead of answering, you've deflected, not come to terms with any. The proper behavior would be to address the errors I've pointed out, not cope, hide and avoid as if they will dissappear if you close your eyes. Little kids do that to avoid situations they don't like. You're not a little kid anymore sir. Time to sack up. 35 for hypocrisy on deflecting btw. I did answer, 3x, I told you I don't need to prove a negative. I even asked you if you know what that means because it doesn't seem to be landing and you dodged 36 for not answering. It's your job to present the info. The link is not specific enough. You can't post a link and say "prove how you are wrong by reading this long link". No. 37. You need to say specifically what in the link you are referring to. Or copy paste the specific section. I'm open, I've literally asked you to do it! I've seen the Mueller report before, I don't need to read it. if you have something say it here. This is about the 15th chance you've had, you keep dodging. The reason is because you were fake when you pretended to care about proof, you never cared about it, you were always a partisan hack, I know that. You're 🤡
English