Samuel 🎭
854 posts




Hello, everyone! New handler, here Tell me what you need before Fortune sacks me. Hurry!

Direct to your Opay account in seconds. That's @Maventrading

🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES. DAY 5: Funded Trading Plus A payout process should be clear from start to finish. When the requirements appear to change after a trader has already been verified and paid once, it's understandable why questions arise. According to the trader: • They passed 2×$250K Challenges. • They completed the firm's KYC process. • They successfully received a first payout of $9,443. • Before the second payout, they were reportedly asked to provide a new passport despite already being KYC verified. • The trader says they were unable to complete fingerprint verification due to a medical condition and offered alternative government-issued identification, which they allege was not accepted. • After later obtaining a passport, the trader claims the focus shifted again, with the firm's review now citing account acquisition as the primary concern. If this timeline is accurate, it raises several important questions. The key questions are: • Why did the verification requirements reportedly change after an earlier payout had already been approved? • What prompted the review to shift from identity verification to account acquisition? • Were the firm's published policies applied consistently throughout the process? • Can additional clarification help both the trader and the wider community understand the decision? At this stage, these are the trader's allegations. Any further response from @FundedTradingP or @LewisM_IF deserves to be included so the community can evaluate the full picture. The goal is to understand the facts. Transparency benefits both traders and firms. 👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for the next case, updates, and unbiased prop firm investigations.

There is no way you can balance trading and work. You have to sacrifice one.




















