n

@DAGToddBlanche I'm with the government on this one, it's like selling me a firearm but then trying to dictate when and where I can use said firearm it in the defense of my home.

Today’s D.C. Circuit stay allowing the government to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk is a resounding victory for military readiness. Our position has been clear from the start — our military needs full access to Anthropic’s models if its technology is integrated into our sensitive systems. Military authority and operational control belong to the Commander-in-Chief and Department of War, not a tech company.

@kyledcheney this one doesn't require much. the ruling is out there. on standing alone the exec is extremely likely to win. not to mention the amount of money that would be wasted because they aren't working. this is not surprising. The appeal from the shutdown one was done within hours also.

Record time appeal from Trump admin on the ballroom.

JUST IN: A federal judge has blocked construciton of the president's ballroom without congressional approval. "He is not the owner," Judge Leon says of Trump. He has delayed his order for 14 days, however, giving Trump a chance to appeal. ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_p…

@Phoenixville45 @kyledcheney @grok that the district court likely overstepped its bounds. The supreme court has pretty 100% sided with the executive on these funding issues.

@kyledcheney @grok what does this mean ?

JUST IN: A federal appeals court panel -- Henderson (GHWB), Wilkins (Obama) Katsas (Trump) -- has stayed Judge Lamberth's order requiring VOA to rehire a huge portion of its staff.

@weiser_h78449 @ProfMJCleveland it's in a footnote, referring to his prior order, it's a doozy, I wouldn't want to ruin the surprise.

@ProfMJCleveland Whats the standing analysis here Leon should have done? Seems like he glossed over it?

Standing???

@ProfMJCleveland my eyes nearly rolled out of their socket, when I read the footnote on standing. I am willing to bet all my assets, the very little I have, this case does not survive on standing grounds if it gets to SCOTUS or a DC panel with any bit of common sense.

@kyledcheney having read the decision in full, this decision is going nowhere. The basis for injury is not getting pass Scotus. I will bet everything this order does not survive the current Scotus standing analysis.

@kyledcheney not to mention what's the basis for standing. I know the court says he ruled they likely have standing, but I don't see how.

@kyledcheney what pointless lawsuit and waste of taxpayer resources. the ballroom is being funded by private money. let him build the thing. so many taxpayer millions are going to be wasted, because the higher court is not going to stop him from building, when its already started.

@bradhoylman I don't get this tweet. Is he saying that his law is still good? Most people don't brag about proposing a law similar to one that 8 justices thought was unconstitutional and viewpoint discrimination.

Conversion therapy is a discredited, harmful practice that puts LGBTQ+ young people at risk. New York will keep doing what’s right and protect our kids and continue to stand firmly on the side of dignity, safety, and equality. I’m proud to have written the legislation alongside @DeborahJGlick to ban this practice for our youth in New York State.

@justin_ryland @chrisgeidner mostly good for the DOJ. The court is probably tired all these lower courts saying their prior ruling had no effect. there is no real need to grant cert before judgement if you are leaning for the plaintiffs.

@chrisgeidner Can anything be imputed to the Court's decision to defer the stays? Ie. A majority's lack of confidence the lower courts' decisions will ultimately be disturbed?

BREAKING: SCOTUS takes up cases over challenges to Sec. Noem's effort to revoke temporary protected status for Syria and Haiti. Notably, the court keeps lower court rulings blocking Noem's revocations in place for now, sets oral arguments for late April. More to come at Law Dork: lawdork.com

@kyledcheney that they granted cert before judgement doesn't bode well for the plaintiffs. I think the Court has had it with lower courts not following it stay orders.

BREAKING: SCOTUS has granted cert on two emergency petitions by the Trump administration to end temporary protected status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants – an issue that has vexed lower courts following two previous, minimally explained stays by the justices. Args in April.

@shipwreckedcrew the thing that surprised is no dissent. a couple of the justices hate gerrymander, but not a peeped about how gerrymandering being the most awful thing in this case. SMH.

But I have been regularly assured that SCOTUS was in the tank for Trump and the GOP. How can this be????? It proves that SCOTUS secretly wants Gavin Newsom to be the next President.

@kyledcheney I wouldn't call that reveling. your bias is showing. While he is clearly not heartbroken about it. "reveling" is a bit much.

Trump is reveling in the apparent homicide of Rob Reiner

@kyledcheney @joshgerstein the district panel decision was DOA from the start. everyone knows this was partisan gerrymandering, to try and reframe as a racial gerrymander was always absurd

@joshgerstein BREAKING: Justice Alito has temporarily blocked the Texas redistricting court's order, effectively restoring the newly drawn map, while the Supreme Court considers the petition. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…

BREAKING: Texas has formally petitioned the Supreme Court to restore its newly drawn congressional map, and Justice Samuel Alito has ordered a response to the petition by Monday at 5PM. Details TK.

@overturnH8 @chrisgeidner only justice Jackson dissented. If you read all the briefs, to me it was very obvious that what the district did was not kosher

@chrisgeidner I realize it’s just an extension of the administrative stay by them, but it’s amazing to me how the SCOTUS majority continues (almost always it seems) to rubber-stamp any and everything presented by the Trump administration — citizen’s rights be damned.

BREAKING: SCOTUS extends Justice Jackson’s administrative stay in the SNAP benefits case through 11:59p Thursday—presumably hoping to moot out the request if the shutdown ends. Jackson wouldn’t have extended the admin stay and would deny DOJ’s stay request.

@ProfMJCleveland what the district court did was a bit shady. Probably why only Jackson dissented.

2/2 This is the SNAP case. SCOTUS extending the Administrative Stay allows it to let the government reopen and then vacate the 1st Circuit/district court decisions without have to get its hands dirty. They did this with the USAID funding too...which just encourage lower courts.

🚨🚨🚨BOOM! Another Trump win! 1/

@chrisgeidner I agree with the majority. what the district court did was a little shady.

@ProfMJCleveland I don't either. because the order to partially fund is not the same as the orders to fully fund. one requires section 32 funds, and one doesn't.

I serious have no idea what the Court is saying.

@allaboutwembley because trump is correct this time. the first circuit should have granted the stay. it's clear the district went too far in ordering section 32 funds being used.

Someone that’s smarter than me explain why Justice Jackson sided with Drumpy?

@mspammajamma @faavouurrr 48 hours after the appeals court rules on the motion.

@faavouurrr For 48 hours