Milo Trujillo

Blazing fast gaming toaster

@katieandfinn One of those freak indoor blizzards

twelve years ago i got home from the monopole to discover that it had, somehow, snowed inside my apartment

@icu_luci Moved to .org

DDosecrets(.)com is down 😭

DDoSecrets has changed domains. Please update your bookmarks, citations, etc.

@Tacticalcyan That's the goal

It looks like ddosecrets[.]com has their domain expired??

@Tacticalcyan It's at ddosecrets .org now, there's a press release, the project has not stopped.

@katieandfinn Could say that tweet really blew up

@ProjPM I do not believe your allegations are made in good faith. Many details are misrepresented or tied where no connections exist, and draw a conspiracy unsupported by evidence. I encourage you to publish your findings and be done with it. I'll join those declining to comment further.

@illegaldaydream @elimisteve As noted below, I'm offering DDoSecrets the chance to refute or clarify material about its activities before publication. Two dozen involved parties have refused comment, including the "journalists" and FBI agents and CP distributors. That leaves you. x.com/ProjPM/status/…

💥 WILD bombshell just dropped! 💥 It turns out that the wannabe @wikileaks successor DDoSecrets was cofounded by (1) a convicted distributor of child pornography and (2) a former employee of CIA subcontractor Wikistrat. Maybe that's why DDoSecrets never seemed to publish anything that embarrassed or held accountable the major US intelligence agencies?! Despite their vast criminality. Dear @NatSecGeek: do you have any response whatsoever? Or are you going to do what the CIA taught you (via Wikistrat) and make dishonest counter-accusations? We shall see.

@TapioTiihonen We did post to our site and newsletter, and that release can be found at ddosecrets dot com/article/epstein-emails

There is no confirmation from DDoSecrets. DDoSecrets always posts releases on their official site and channels. There is no such release currently published by them.

@DarkWebInformer The attached file is a copy of one of our public releases, not a "data breach" 🙄

🚨Alleged Data Breach and Data Leak of DDoSecrets

@bayesianboy Congratulations, this is wonderful!

All done.

@MaestroAdrianMP Debido a BlueLeaks theverge.com/2020/6/24/2130…

@grok @GuacamayanLeaks @FGRMexico oye @grok por que DDoSecrets ha sido bloqueado en plataformas como Twitter?

Sí, teóricamente las donaciones a DDoSecrets podrían venir de lavado de dinero, individuos inmorales o corporaciones dudosas, pero no hay evidencia de esto. Sus reportes financieros muestran ingresos de $60,456 en 2023, mayormente de donaciones individuales y ONGs, sin fondos gubernamentales o corporativos grandes. Mantienen privacidad de donantes, algo común, y no hay reportes de fuentes poco éticas. Su misión de transparencia sugiere que vetan donantes, haciendo improbable ese riesgo.

@OneFine23954114 This is incorrect. We were banned from Twitter two years before Musk bought it, after publishing BlueLeaks.

@EdKrassen Let's hope and pray that someone will spill the beans to DDoSecrets (banned from Twitter ever since Musk got his hands on it).

No, the FBI didn't release any Epstein Files publicly. Everything listed below was already available under the Biden Administration. What is the Trump administration hiding? Dump it all publicly. What's taking so long? Why are they so scared?

@S0115994864760 @LibraryOfLeaks @AP submissions @ ddosecrets dot com (on that webpage with our PGP public key)

@LibraryOfLeaks @AP What's the e-mail address?

We call for the @AP to be allowed to cover the White House.

@newscientist No, what a shockingly dangerous suggestion.

One of OpenAI’s leading artificial intelligence models can diagnose medical conditions with superhuman ability, but does that mean you should be turning to a chatbot for health advice? #Echobox=1735783642" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/246154…

happy birthday to DDoSecrets! one of the most important institutions of the current day free internet

@ATinyGreenCell It sounds like you can post summaries of the data (such as analysis in research papers) so long as you don't redistribute the underlying data yourself

@illegaldaydream Im trying to find a way to spin this such that an open access author could agree to this and ethically be in the clear. I'm not a fancy scientist here but have enough experience for my eye to twitch at this statement. What?

How could anyone publish using these data given this agreement? I legit would rather sequence what I need myself and make it publicly available than download it to quietly stare at in solitude. I'm genuinely confused at the cognitive dissonance here. What?