Sabitlenmiş Tweet
isa 🫧
12.6K posts

isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi

Hi everyone! Danielle’s birthday is coming up and I’m making a birthday video again this year, with written messages and drawings/digital edits. 🎂💛 If you have some time, please send your message or artwork through the form! 💌✨
forms.gle/T5h2BJV9mM5Y6o…

English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

Newjeans phoning media content archive
📂 gdrive (60GB +)
drive.google.com/drive/folders/…
podcast yt links
🐻
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
🦦
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
🐶
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
🐱
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
🐣
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
🐨z
youtube.com/playlist?list=…


English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

When it comes to NewJeans, Olivia admits she doesn’t know much. “It’s complicated over there. I don’t even have a full grasp [of the situation], if I’m completely honest,” she says. “I can't say much about the situation. I don’t know any details, but I support my sister with whatever she does. All I want is the best for her and I’m just praying for the girls. I love her to death — that’s my baby.”
teenvogue.com/story/olivia-m…

English
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi

Danielle vs ADOR pre-trial summary:
- At the prep hearing for ADOR's lawsuit against Danielle, the judge denied a request by a third party to join the case, and set two court dates: May 14 and July 2.
- ADOR is suing for damages and penalty fees related to alleged contract violations. The lawsuit is not only against Danielle but also her mother and Min Hee-jin, even though they are not directly tied to the exclusive contract. Danielle's lawyers flagged this as unusual.
- Danielle's lawyers pushed for the case to wrap up within 3 months, saying ADOR has had since December to gather evidence — nearly 3 months — and there's no reason to drag it out.
- ADOR's lawyers said they weren't ready with their evidence plan and asked for more time. Danielle's side pushed back, calling it a delay tactic to hurt her career during her prime years as an idol.
- ADOR argued that Danielle can continue her activities regardless of the outcome. However, Danielle's side disagreed, saying ADOR would likely challenge or interfere with any activities she attempts, given the grounds they used to terminate her contract.
- The judge pointed out that "tampering" — the main legal issue in this case — has almost no precedent in Korean civil courts, and asked both sides to look into how similar cases were handled abroad. A related tampering case involving another idol group is currently being heard at the High Court, but the ruling hasn't been made public yet.
- The judge suggested that instead of calling witnesses, both sides could first submit written explanations for any digital evidence, and only proceed to in-person witness examination if absolutely necessary — to keep the process shorter.
- The judge noted that most disputes between artists and agencies tend to settle out of court, which is why there are so few court rulings on record. He encouraged both sides to keep the door open for mediation.


English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

At first pre-trial hearing in ADOR’s ₩43B lawsuit against Danielle, her side says the company is deliberately dragging proceedings by asking to postpone hearings:
— “From Danielle’s perspective, she is an idol. If the lawsuit is prolonged, she will inevitably suffer damage. This is the most important and shining period of her career as an idol. Since the plaintiff (ADOR) is an entertainment agency, they are aware of this, which is why it seems they are delaying the case. They did not only target Danielle but also filed against her mother and Min Hee-jin, who are unrelated to the exclusive contract.
Recently, in a written opinion, they requested to postpone the preparatory hearing by two months, and it appears the plaintiff is trying to drag this case out. We request that this case be handled swiftly and intensively.
Since this case was initiated by the plaintiff, they should already have a plan for proving their claims. The key issues have been identified, and a significant amount of evidence has already been revealed. There is no need to prolong the case to gather evidence.”
m.entertain.naver.com/home/article/4…


English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

Prediction for tomorrow:
Danielle wins the case
MHHH enters the court with a dramatic entrance
MHDHH group hugs
MHHH tells ador they are also terminating their contracts
Ador dies in defeat
Everyone starts singing and dancing to super shy.
EMPIRE@EmpireIX
ADOR have submitted No Evidence or Written Statement to Court in their Lawsuit against Danielle. Meanwhile Danielle's side submitted documents of evidence including written evidence along with an opinion on the progress of the procedure. The Judge on the case recently rejected ADOR's request to delay the initial hearing for the trial just a few hours after their request.
English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

ADOR have submitted No Evidence or Written Statement to Court in their Lawsuit against Danielle.
Meanwhile Danielle's side submitted documents of evidence including written evidence along with an opinion on the progress of the procedure.
The Judge on the case recently rejected ADOR's request to delay the initial hearing for the trial just a few hours after their request.


English
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi
isa 🫧 retweetledi

Isn't it interesting? The plaintiff suing for damages worth $30M is the one delaying? It seems like they don't have enough evidence.
Source Music and Belift delayed the hearing against MHJ multiple times too. Thankfully this judge sees through their tactics.
EMPIRE@EmpireIX
ADOR requested to delay the date of their trial against NewJeans Danielle. The Judge has just rejected their request and said to proceed as scheduled.
English
isa 🫧 retweetledi

[daum] The edit of NewJeans' faces over the OOAK Records recruitment notice receives attention — netizens demand the return of NewJeans
tinyurl.com/4xv3m3nm



English



























