Imru Al Qays Talha Jebril⚡امرؤ القيس طلحة جبريل

@Manu_Sisti Send

I'm convinced. AI eBooks are THE most reliable path to $10k a month in 2026. No webistes, sales funnel or a big team needed. Only Claude, ChatGPT and 1 hour every day. I’m finally giving away acess to a training that'll show you how to create these AI eBooks for FREE. (All my personal prompts included) Comment "Send" and I will DM you: (Must follow me to get DM). FREE for 24 hrs only

🔴 Imru AL Qays Talha Jebril, Co-Managing Partner at @Ak_advisors, stresses that #AI cannot replace human interaction, trust-building, and contextual engagement, especially in local settings and languages.

@LegacySiu Brahim Diaz

Name an African who has played for Real Madrid. You can’t

@s_mohinii Claude

🚨Breaking , In 2026, Claude is my operating system. After 300+ hrs I built the full blueprint: → Claude Projects + Code + Cowork → n8n MCP + SEO MCPs → Opus 4.6 + Skills Blueprint Agencies charge $5K-10K for this. Free for you. Like + Comment "claude" and Follow me I'll DM you.

@s_mohinii Claudd

@Ryoshi_versX @cryptomercy You're losing your money

The lower $EGLD goes, the more frequently I’m buy. I totally expect people to dump EGLD into the $3’s, maybe even $2’s. Picking up cheap EAPES, ProjectX Subjects, and SRB Bears on the way

@Atourabi Très bien dit cher ami, cela dit je cherchais des solutions concrètes pour palier à ce problème...!

"Nous vivons dans un pays où il ne se passe rien. Aucun responsable ne démissionne, les enquêtes s’ouvrent pour ne jamais se clore, et nous sommes les champions du monde des rapports qui ne débouchent sur aucune action. Le Maroc devrait penser à aménager un cimetière des rapports, qui jouxterait le mausolée des commissions et le sanctuaire des instances et des conseils qui ne servent à rien. Prenons juste pour illustration ce qui s’est passé ces derniers mois : des milliers de jeunes dans les rues demandant le départ du Chef du gouvernement, une accusation de délit d’initié engageant le ministre de l’Éducation nationale, un ministre de la Justice soupçonné de fraude fiscale, un scandale au sein de l’instance censée gérer les affaires de la presse, des maisons qui s’effondrent sur leurs habitants, une rivière qui ravage le centre historique d’une ville… Et pourtant, aucune conséquence. Rien ! Comme dans le film Un jour sans fin,on se réveille le lendemain avec les mêmes acteurs et le même décor, dans l’attente de nouveaux scandales et drames à commenter. » Toute la chronique ici mobile.telquel.ma/2025/12/19/le-…

@CAF_Online @caf_online_AR @CAF_Media SERIOUSLY FIX YOUR SHIT. APP NOT WORKING !! How are we supposed to buy CAN/CAF tickets when your app can't do basic things.

@crypto_div Sold all my egld at a huge loss.. the premise that there was a fixed supply was the convincing argument. Now tbh this is becoming a shitshow. Run.

My Thoughts on MultiversX’s Proposed EGLD Tokenomics Changes My initial thoughts to MultiversX’s new EGLD tokenomics are mixed. I understand the rationale, and see it's benefit in the long term- but I’m concerned about the increased risks for existing investors. Currently, EGLD has a capped supply of approximately 31.4M tokens. Staking rewards come from issuance that decreases over time, supplemented by transaction fees. This is a scarcity driven model- similar to Bitcoin’s supply/demand dynamics and is what attracted investors who believed in MultiversX’s tech. All of us expected value growth as demand increased. The key problem has been that DeFi adoption faltered industry wide, and MultiversX has struggled to attract users, leading to a consistent decline in EGLD’s value despite its limited supply. The key fact- scarcity doesn’t drive value without demand. The new tokenomics aim to address this by shifting from scarcity to a growth model. Here are the key changes: Supply Cap Removal & Inflation: - 31.4M EGLD cap would be eliminated - 9.47% annual tail inflation rate, minting roughly 2.8M new EGLD per year based on the current supply. - 10% of base transaction fees burned- creating deflationary pressure that scales with network usage. - “Reflexive Strategic Investment” minting process could add up to 9.42M EGLD if price hits thresholds ($20, $35, or $50). These tokens would be locked for 3 years for strategic initiative use like institutional partnerships and market expansion. Emissions Allocation: Newly minted EGLD would be distributed as follows: - 50% to normal staking rewards - 20% to an Ecosystem Growth Fund (DAO managed grants for builders, tied to user adoption and TVL) - 20% to a Growth Dividend Fund (rewards for users particpating in active yield ie. deploying staked EGLD in DeFi via liquid staking derivatives) - 10% for protocol sustainability and development These allocations could be adjusted annually via governance votes. High Level Growth Mechanisms: - Staking yields 9-12% APR, to help increase staking ratio to over 65% - Transaction fees split into base fees (90% to dApp builders, 10% burned) and priority fees to validators for faster processing. - Protocol revenue to fund open market EGLD buybacks, which are then staked. - Create a positive feedback loop: Higher usage generates revenue, buybacks reduce supply and boost staking, while growth incentives attract more activity. - Tie EGLD’s value to ecosystem utility vs. scarcity alone. This entire change proposal screams utility vs. scarcity. Scarcity didn't work, and the lack of utility may be what's hindering growth- that's the mentality I'm betting is behind the decisions from the MultiversX team. All the changes focus on incentives to attract builders, investors, and DeFi users to boost TVL. They’ve recognized that strong tech and scarcity aren’t enough. MultiversX saw its largest user boost in my memory- during the xExchange launch when APR incentives were astronomically high. As DeFi usage declined industry wide and incentives stabilized, and the network struggled to compete with chains like Ethereum or Solana. The proposal for the tokenomics change has sparked significant backlash, with many arguing it breaks promises of a fixed supply- diluting value for existing holders. Many investors, including myself- originally bought EGLD for its scarcity driven model, expecting value to rise with demand. The shift to an inflationary model introduces greater risk, as its success still hinges on speculative adoption. The caveat is that the additional incentives could drive missing adoption. The risk is simple- if the incentives fail to attract sufficient users and builders, inflation could outpace demand, driving value down. My suggestion to investors remains the same- consider diversifying portfolios to manage increased risk, potentially allocating to assets like Bitcoin while monitoring MultiversX’s adoption metrics (TVL, transaction volume, user growth). When risk rises, reducing exposure is a basic principle of portfolio management. Blind faith needs to end. Your portfolio risk and it's value growth should be your sole concern. I’m cautiously optimistic that these changes could revitalize MultiversX’s ecosystem, but I’ll remain on the sidelines with DeFi investments, including EGLD, until I see tangible signs of success- rising network usage, prices, and trading volume. For now, the proposal’s fate depends on community governance, and I encourage EGLD holders to participate to shape its direction. Stay away from bashing the team- their logic and decisions make sense. Their community engagement is much higher than I've ever seen, and that's a very good thing. Ask them questions, participate in spaces, and make the best decisions for yourself. It's up to you to determine your risk profile and make portfolio decisions that drive your value growth moving forward. If this means lowering your risk and moving into BTC or other assets until you're certain on your EGLD risk profile- so be it. It comes with the territory when changes are made and we all know this. As always- I'll keep my feedback and decisions public, balanced, and unbiased. As time goes on and my strategies evolve, you'll be the first to know. For now, I'm waiting, watching, and sticking with BTC.

@PastaBeanFras Lets see where "reading a chart" takes you. Good luck to you. I read charts all day. NGMI yourself.

@ImruuK Proof you can't even read a chart. NGMI

$EGLD where are we at this point in the cycle? #multiversX

@PastaBeanFras Capitulation. Here's your answer

@ImruuK Still avoiding the question I see

@PastaBeanFras Everytime it dips , we're calling it the bottom... even Xportal does not even mention keeps sending SUI notifications.. the team has given up on the project..

@ImruuK So how can it be “nowhere” on the chart? Use your brain.

@PastaBeanFras I'm serious been with the project since ERD... it's dead. It has no use case.

@ImruuK 🤡

The Other World Cup Match: Morocco vs. Incivility (Ta-hargaouit) open.substack.com/pub/imruwrites…

@crypto_div @ulwa We got obliterated by $Egld... unfortunately. Same for all alts. Yes it seems beyond institutional coins all else will die.

@ulwa Agreed- this definitely looks like the case. I'm still going to monitor them closely in case a sleeper altseason ever occurs.

Very skeptical on the future cycles of the altcoins. In the last 10 days Ethereum moved up 25% and barely any alts matched it. In the past, BTC rose, ETH followed, then other alts had massive runs. This time, BTC rose independently, ETH rose slower- with a large move up only once likelihood of tradfi allocation rose. Alts have risen far less than ETH, without the massive rises of the past (yet). Previously altcoins meant high risk/high reward, but for quite a while they've been high risk/low reward relative to the performance of BTC and ETH. I'm cautious of jumping back into trading alts. Today I'm finding the asymmetric trade opportunity exists in Bitcoin treasury companies. Thus far, these have been medium risk/high reward, provided you sell when mNAV reaches > 2.2x. Cycles are changing and I'll keep sharing new observations- for now, practice high risk management with alts and consider higher performing plays.

@LeMaurethereal @chaouibati T'es propos se rapprochent du Nazisme

@chaouibati Oui, les aider sur place et travailler ensemble je suis pour, mais leurs populations sur place

Sauvons notre cher pays des différentes menaces

📢 تذكير: لا تفوّتوا الندوة الرقمية التي سينظمها المعهد المغربي لتحليل السياسات بعد يومين تحت عنوان: "من العمل المحلي إلى التأثير في السياسات: مقاربات الترافع البيئي في المغرب" 🔗 للتسجيل: tinyurl.com/ut7ht257

@Veroc_Daniel Project is dead. Sold my bags. Hodler since 2020. The price action and interest are not there. So unfortunate

Stop wasting time on energy-drainers. When $EGLD begins its explosive rise, the weakest will whine, blame, and lash out. That’s the signal. We’re close. From the ashes, we rise like a phoenix. Stay focused. Accumulate. Relentlessly.

@WHALES_CRYPTOzz It's at 18 $ what are you saying ...?