z

@JamesKowalski88 This guy ignores every refutation of his claims lol

Apologists claim the Quran is the literal, uncreated speech of Allah. But Surah 69:40 literally says it is 'the WORD of a noble Messenger'! 🤣

@ProphetBartEhr «Somehow both Jesus and Allah are supreme judges» 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 you’re so embarrassing. On top that you’re so slow 😭

@Cradiant0 Your original tweet wasn’t even in intelligible English, you absolute inbred fucktard. Yes, according to Islam’s hilariously fucking fake theology, somehow both Jesus and Allah are your supreme judges 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

The funniest part about this shit is according to Islamic theology, they believe Jesus is their messiah and judge on judgement day. (Which is ironically true) They will willingly condemn themselves to hell to defend their pedophile prophet LMFAOOOOOOOOOO Dumbest people in history

@LilLaaHilHamd @TaymiApologia Are you one of those ash’ari/maturidi dogs? If yes then no wonder no one’s paying attention to you

@TaymiApologia You still havent repented from: youtube.com/watch?v=mMnN5i…

OLD TIK TOK account banned FOLLOW The New One @themuslimapologia On Tik Tok بارك الله فيكم

@ProphetBartEhr You genuinely tweeted with full confidence «judge on judgementday» stop coping 😂😂😂

@Cradiant0 “Yeah you can’t real 😂😂 «judge on judgement day»” What level of inbreeding induced autism does it require to unironically tweet those words

@waqt1me @BroHajji So? You thought you cooked so bad 😂

@BroHajji Everyone crying in the replies, bro hajj does this with everyone without discrimination, cope.

gofund.me/743f80c74 May Allah grant you complete Shifaa…آمين My dear brother, I kindly request you if are willing to provide complete transparency with complete transaction receipts for the hospital costs related to the treatment you’re paying for. You’ve exceeded your deadline significantly so I’m curious to know where the remaining funds have gone. It’s only fair considering Jake organised a fundraiser for medical bills with a target of $5,000 and successfully raised over $80,000. I understand this isn’t being insensitive but it would be helpful if you could provide the necessary documentation. This is not a unreasonable ask, after Hamza’s Den grift nothing surprises me unfortunately. بارك الله فيك @muslimorthodoxy

@KontrRevolucija @SapienceOrg Most trash thread i have ever read 😂😂😂 «Allah enters creation» 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

NEW DAWAH: According to @SapienceOrg, "Allah" descending to the lowest heaven is like a guy slightly hunching over while seated on office furniture from Walmart. This is Islamic theology. Yes, it's THAT da'if. NEVER let Muslims gaslight you. Analysis below 🧵👇 #Athari Creed

@KontrRevolucija @incognitusz Why are you dodging the question 😂 does descend mean enter creation?

@incognitusz What is the 'lowest heaven' @incognitusz? Is it part of the Creation? Yes or No? Maybe spend less time spamming emojis and more time learning, eh?

@KontrRevolucija @strikeharderpag Chatgpt failed you 😂😂 go ahead, give the argument for how that changes the divinity of Allah

@strikeharderpag What we believe is compatible with our theology (ie, the Truth). What you believe is a total mess: 🔹Allah = spatial (🤣) + **truly descends** 🔹This involves transition from non-descent to descent 🔹Congratulations, you just introduced CHANGE to the Divinity of Allah! 🎉🏆

Dr. Sa’id Foudah, a leading Jahmi scholar of our time, refutes his Ash’ari and Māturīdi fanboy’s claims on the inauthenticity of “Kitab asunnah” by ʿAbdullāh ibn Ahmad. After being questioned about the authenticity of the book, he explains how a book’s authenticity isn’t dependent upon its chain of transmission and that shuhra is a sufficient condition to establish a book’s authenticity. He also brings Ash’ari books that have no chain of transmission—or at least a weak chain of transmission—such as those written by Ibn Furak, Al-Ghazali and more.

@HPhobiaWatch We have street shitting animals talking about smell

Imagine the smell

@AhmedSheriffdin We have grown man that believe in a God who can’t do anything 😂 the greek faggots got into your head

Nooooo 😭, Ibn Taymiyah really got these grown men saying nonsense

@ZouhairsMurid Discussions about theology > realises the error in their arguments > resorts to misrepresnting > some guy calls him out for it > tweets «anything less relevant to say» to imply it’s irrelevant. > gets called out for it again > resorts to whatever this cope is 😭 You got it man

@Cradiant0 "I like waffles" "So you don't like pancakes" Next irrelevant comment I'll block you

Salafi: If 3 entities are divine, how does that entail 3 gods?

@zjnhnfi When? I’m interested

@Cradiant0 I will bro just stop the dr

🥱💀

@ZouhairsMurid Truth is irrelevant to you? Whatever cope floats your boat i guess

@Cradiant0 Sure thing. You got anything less relevant to say?

@ZouhairsMurid Makes sense for why you keep tweeting, you don’t care about truth 🤦‍♂️

@Cradiant0 You can silence 50 scholars with one fact, but you can’t silence one idiot with 50 facts.

Ex Muslim BLUNDERS HARD Says that the Quran talks about how Jesus will come back to Judge the living and the dead 😂😂😂

@hashimiyy_ Go up to his live and have a discussion with him. Bet you won’t even reply to this tweet because you know the truth is against you

My spine shuddered at this nightmare of an explanation. 1) He attributed movement to the Creator of movement. Imām al-Ṭabarī says movement is negated for Allāh by consensus of Ahl al-Qiblah, and he even uses this as a refutation of the Muʿtazilah when they claim the Qurʾān is created. Imām Junayd al-Baghdādī said that knowing Allāh creates the movements and stillness of creatures is fundamental to tawḥīd. 2) His analogy was disastrous and resulted in a contradiction within his own creed. It resembles the analogy of water, ice, and vapor used to convey the Trinity, which results in heresy: modalism. The very same issue occurs here. His analogy results in the “heresy” of taʾwīl. He used his intellect to negate the impossibility of entering creation and said the descent was merely his God’s body coming closer to creation. The second aspect he interpreted away is that only an attribute, or worse, a portion of Allāh moves downward. How can one critique the muʾawwil who says one of His actions, mercy, descends while holding such a position? 3) His moving downward to analogize the attributes of Allāh is even worse than when a man gestured with his own hands to discuss Allāh’s Hands. Imām Mālik ordered the amputation of this man’s hand. One can only wonder what this esteemed Imām of the Salaf would say regarding him.