Tuleo

@skefhaus that’s not what a dad bod is

women find the “dad bod” attractive under the condition that you have decent top half. you cant have sad tits. you can have shapely pecs, puffy even if youre bulky, but a weak chest is what breaks it bench press is your friend. bulk up your shoulders too. thank me later

@endofanerajc @MagdalenesAngel she wouldn’t view it as creepy though if he was attractive

@MagdalenesAngel it would be creepy even if he was hot. it is also simply not good business.

These situations are so interesting to witness bc it’s creepy only because he’s ugly if he was hot this would be the best day ever

we fucking lost i knew it from Gabriel’s face he was gonna miss gg

@BRalabamaPe @cult_il agree it’s mean spirited but women equating height with weight is obnoxious

@inceliban_ @cult_il If you’re an adult you don’t laugh at people’s face and make them feel like shit, cruelty is uncivilized

Women seeing a shorter man would lose it far harder than these guys. Peak hypocrisy.

@buldakclit @noceus12 @profesionlangel real life is dating apps

@noceus12 @profesionlangel why do you guys only use dating apps only as sources, instead of real life statistics or sources. You know how people act face to face

the “looksmaxxing” epidemic was the closest thing males have ever experienced to the beauty standards women are upheld to all their lives and it literally made them all insane

@zapatas_mom or women to stop being delusional and banging chad thinking he’s into them ??

The “Chads” suffer too. The end up with Peter Pan syndrome and think they can continue their lifestyle into their 40s and 50s (very few can). The way to fix all of this is to ask handsome charming men to stop seeking casual sex with lots of women.

@razibkhan 1990 republicans weren’t retarded

in 1990 when i moved to oregon 3 out of 4 senators in oregon and washington were republicans

Small penises are aristocratic, high class, high IQ, high caste. People who fetishize big cocks are slaves to their base instincts, incapable of appreciating refined precision and sophisticated manhood. Few understand this.

@loganclarkhall @jeremykauffman if an entity every declares war again you do you think it’s based and patriotic for them to purposely torture and kill your children

@jeremykauffman Kid is a Patriot

8yo: dad, what's a war crime me: *explains* 8yo: that's stupid there are no rules in war

Çünkü erkekleri dizi başrolleri ile kıyaslıyorsun, kızları kendinle

@gfodor @luyun0120 but you’ve also been coalposting for 30 years

@luyun0120 i've been programming for 30 years

Thread. I thought I was immune from ever feeling hollowed out by AI as a programmer, because I've always gotten far more enjoyment from shipping, getting users, and solving problems than indulging in the art of coding. As the LLMs have eaten deeper and deeper into our field, I've empathized with my peers who've expressed a sense of loss and disillusionment as the art of programming has become more and more automated. But, I've always seen myself as someone who saw coding as a means to an end to solve problems. Not something whose craftsmanship, culture, methodologies, and fads were worth getting too hung up on, beyond what was needed to adeptly deliver value to others and not fall behind the (frankly, rare) genuine advancements over the years. This all changed for me over the last week. The frontier probably shifted a bit earlier than today, but I didn't see it until now. The change has come about for me because GPT-5.5 was able to build complex software I needed built autonomously for 2-3 days at a clip. Work that would have taken me months, or even years if you include learning the requisite languages, libraries, and tooling, being completed over a weekend. This isn't something I think anyone who has been programming as long as I have can really be prepared for, this kind of velocity jump is just mindboggling. This is truly superhuman performance - it's not perfect, and there certainly is a level of simplicity and clarity that would come in the hands of the world's best programmers, but that margin is so small so as to be unnoticable when contrasted with the sheer volume of working software that it can produce per unit time. So, why has this caused a shift in the way I feel about these technologies, after all this time not having felt it as each subsequent model advanced closer to what we see now? There are two reasons. First, it's clear that the age of humans understanding how software works is over. Yes, humans will need to understand things, at least for a few more years, but we are now at a kind of escape velocity where the % of lines of code that are created every year that are even read, nevermind understood, by humans, is now permanently declining. But the real shift, is I am no longer a programmer, I am a manager. Good managers do not take credit for the work of their team - they see themselves in service of their team. Up until now, claiming "I built this" still felt true when talking about things I had created with the help of LLMs. But now, when the LLMs are writing thousands of lines of code, and I am simply providing guidance, direction setting, and oversight to catching the bigger errors, I found myself in the bizarre situation (that many will be in soon, I presume) of no longer feeling entitled to take credit for the work being done. Not being able to say "I built this" when sharing something whose basic conception came from my own mind, but under the tireless effort of these insane machines to actually reason through and materialize into a working solution, is devastating. Not because of the fact it doesn't feel truthful now, but because I know it will never be truthful again for myself and soon for all of the rest of us.

@stephwakefield_ @default_friend @TheAnnaGat and the rest as essentially biofuel. if human consciousness had any inherent merit beyond this hardware conception, then the subhumans would have a legitimate claim to being equals, but they can’t have that.

@stephwakefield_ @default_friend @TheAnnaGat cause right wingers are fundamentally misanthropes, they hate most of humanity, viewing them as subhumans. They’re largely iq types / hereditarians who see humans as fundamentally complex computers, with whites and east asians being the worthwhile computers

The next anti-woke position is the fight against anthropocentrism. I’m just early,

@francoisfleuret question, the iq of models have long since super ceded that of animals (and that of many humans) models that can be run locally. do you think there is potential for consciousness to exist in these laptops ??

If you have certainties about the "hard problem", you are a midwit.

@Robob54174945 @Graffitinights1 feel like you all live in microscopic bubbles

@inceliban_ @Graffitinights1 At 35 in nyc I would argue no, it’s probably closer to the middle for finance outcomes

I feel like in nyc there is this pedalization of the finance bro. Yes it can be a great life if you do well but the reality is you’re likely not going to be the top dog in terms of money in your 20s or 30s, including when it comes to dating Take a moderately successful 35 yo finance bro making $700K a year. After taxes, rent, savings etc that *might* leave $100K a year for an entertainment budget. Nowadays the… how do I say it… “practical” young women in nyc want a $10K/month allowance minimum so he can’t even afford that. On the other hand, take a 35 y.o. trust fund kid with a $100mm trust fund with 4% annual withdrawals for living expenses (with favorable tax treatment). He can afford TEN TIMES the entertainment spend of the successful finance bro and he DOESNT WORK. PJ to Aspen for a ski week? No problem. Villa in the Maldives? Ditto. Meanwhile the finance bro is sharing a rental in East Hampton and going to Surf Lodge Now you might say the trust fund bros are few and far between but I’d wager there’s more of them in NYC than there are women on the Wilhelmina main board I’ve never seen a finance bro who does well with women who wouldn’t otherwise do well if he was broke. I’ve seen plenty of dorky ass trust fund guys pull dimes

@enggirlfriend i just know ur ass is flatter than kansas

i lost 20lbs over the last year (125 -> 105lbs) and it’s fascinating how different american and korean people around me respond americans: - do you have an eating disorder - you look too skinny - assumes i’m not healthy koreans: - tell me your diet techniques - assumes i lost weight to look better - not afraid to ask me questions (there’s no stigma talking about weight to women) americans are so fat pilled their view of weight is so skewed obviously everyone is case by case but i feel great being at 105lbs. i was always an extremely skinny child and my family is genetically thin. i feel the best ive felt in years at this weight most adult americans should lose some weight and thats just a simple truth. people are just in denial 🤷‍♀️

@avidseries did a mexican penetrate you or something

Lowell is a nationally-ranked elite school filled with brilliant Asians. Mission is a crap school filled with functionally illiterate Latinxos. Berkeley prefers the dumb Latinxos because antiracism dictates that diversity, not excellence, is the highest value.

@masochistmartyr pure likes you constantly see gym bros with fat girls and ugly asian girls with attractive white guys

@funandprofitco @ArtemisConsort you think the catholic take is to view ai as conscious ? mind you, what about you makes you catholic, hating others ?

@ArtemisConsort It's embarrassing to be a Catholic. His interpretations on illegal migration, AI, gays in the church, and refusal to defend Christianity should be criticized.

I know I’ll anger some followers with this, but I find this embarrassingly juvenile. Many of these claims are mere technical problems: embodiment, sensors, continual learning. The rest are just special pleading. These systems can already discuss love, friendship, responsibility etc more lucidly than most humans, so the claim must be some sort of totally unfalsifiable human chauvinism. There is no possible set of behaviors AIs could exhibit which would put a dent in his confidence in these assertions. An embodied AI (robot) could be raised (continually learning in context) among humans, exhibiting every conceivable sign of love, compassion, responsibility, and friendship, and the Pope would still say “doesn’t count because silicon instead of meat”. It would be more respectable if he just said “I don’t care if they can exhibit these traits because humans are my tribe” but instead he makes a giant list of assertions that have either already been proven false, will be proven false soon, or are unfalsifiable.