indif4ent

14.6K posts

indif4ent banner
indif4ent

indif4ent

@indif4ent

autological recursion

Katılım Temmuz 2020
1.3K Takip Edilen973 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
[Prudence Peony] With kaleidoscopic eyes, to rend cerulean skies; Iridescent dyes, of every hue; apply. Despair's lies, a mortal's cries; The throes of death, as sinners die; Diaphanous bloom, their doom; defied.
English
0
2
6
2.6K
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@FangYi11101 ...kinds of short date-me profiles truncate out the microdetails that matter. write something thats truly vulnerable, instead a list of coarse "self-pros" or basic wants/likes. then maybe you'll find someone who's really meant for you
English
0
0
0
2
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@FangYi11101 attachment is cognitive-emotional synchronization. deep, persistent attachment is deep synchronization on micro-intrinsic cognitive-emotional peculiarities of the pair. outward attractiveness/status is barely relevant and these...
English
1
0
0
11
indif4ent retweetledi
神樂坂🌸心海
神樂坂🌸心海@xinhaiying521·
好可爱的拟人图! asd+adhd可能是是造物主创造的最奇妙的神经多样性组合吧
神樂坂🌸心海 tweet media
Taiwan 🇹🇼 中文
18
284
2.6K
37.1K
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@xlr8harder ...as physical carriers for information transmission and manipulation between and within (thinking) cognitive systems. any system that manipulates information "thinks," whether it uses symbols or not
English
0
0
0
6
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@xlr8harder the whole question is ill-typed. symbols arent some special class of ontic thing, they're just semi-stable socio-thermodynamic convergence points of aggregated human cognitive-conceptual models, serving...
English
1
0
0
9
indif4ent retweetledi
Sichu Lu
Sichu Lu@lu_sichu·
Do you even know who @SchmidhuberAI is? He has been doing fundamental work on AI since before you were born. He is far more of an expert on AI than you, or 99.999% of self-proclaimed "experts". He has always thought about AI in the right ways. You are attacking his authority??
∿spencer.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​@_ontologic

Do you even know who @GaryMarcus is? He has been doing fundamental work on AI since before you were born. He is far more of an expert on AI than you, or 99.999% of self-proclaimed "experts". He has always thought about AI in the right ways. You are attacking his authority??

English
2
2
7
655
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
the hallmark of correctness is logical rigidity that explains things in boring, mundane ways. profundity signals error
English
0
0
1
37
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@tomieinlove any singular piece of art may look "worthless" but its really just a colossal collective "random" (not) walk that reintegrates into informational coherence at scale. its why diffusion models work [as are most things, i suppose] 😹
English
0
0
1
242
tomie
tomie@tomieinlove·
“art is useless”—uh have you considered it provides AI training data
English
18
143
2.9K
36.7K
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@sudovatnik ...non-injective "subjectivity" makes it easier to commit fraud, where the incentives to make "novel" contributions are strong. the coarser the grain, the more fraudulent (e.g., look at psychology's replication crisis, and every hyperreal humanities field ever)
English
0
0
1
28
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@sudovatnik pretty sure the racists self-select into it. what motivates one to be interested in human genetics? often because they want to understand/justify unjustified/niche beliefs about human determinism. for the rest, its because the discipline is coarse enough that massive...
English
1
0
4
65
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@wordgrammer ...without problematic reification of non-ontic things in its roots, math is much superior
English
0
0
0
18
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@wordgrammer ...experience), the inherent subjectivity/non-injectivity of verbal definitions means its hard for others to understand correctly when you do. at least on the front of unambiguous expression of meaning,...
English
1
0
0
17
indif4ent retweetledi
spor
spor@sporadica·
the greatest feeling in the world for man, second to none, is winning a big stuffed animal for your girlfriend from one of those rigged carnival games
English
4
1
82
2.7K
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
op is committing truncation error and not considering systemic effects. hes looking at isolated cases
indif4ent@indif4ent

@minordissent to the contrary, this is why democracy is the "least bad" system that we currently have and why the founding fathers were right. everyone lacks common sense/expertise somewhere for some things, due to intrinsic and trained comparative advantages/specializations. democracy...

English
0
0
1
40
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@minordissent ...making systematically boneheaded decisions in some areas alongside overlooking tiny local micro-optimizations that they have no attentional/computational capacity for
English
0
0
0
23
indif4ent
indif4ent@indif4ent·
@minordissent ...to learn and develop deep understanding in construction. without democracy, hierarchical monte carlo loses much of its potency because theres no formal mechanism to prevent homogenized elites who are boneheaded in some areas from...
English
1
0
0
87