Sachin Singh

311 posts

Sachin Singh banner
Sachin Singh

Sachin Singh

@insachins

AI Product Manager | Passionate about AI, AGI & their impact on humanity | Sharing insights on product strategy, technology and the future we’re building

San Francisco, CA Katılım Aralık 2014
210 Takip Edilen188 Takipçiler
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@fedespi_ @grok Is this a typical trend that losing team in the final leave the ground before the presentation?
English
1
0
0
1.3K
Federico Spina
Federico Spina@fedespi_·
En las últimas 4 finales del Mundial, solamente dos planteles subcampeones se quedaron en el campo de juego hasta la entrega de la copa: Argentina 2014 y Argentina 2026. Pero bueno... Como no te arrodillaste, no sabes perder.
Federico Spina tweet mediaFederico Spina tweet mediaFederico Spina tweet mediaFederico Spina tweet media
Español
246
15.1K
94.3K
1.1M
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
If you are wondering what this is: We’re moving from prompting AI to teaching AI. Claude’s new “Record a Skill” feature lets you demonstrate a task once, then turns that demonstration into a reusable workflow the AI can execute again. The bigger idea isn’t the feature itself—it’s the shift in interface. For decades, automation required code, APIs, or workflow builders. Then came prompting. Now we’re entering an era where AI learns by watching humans work. The end goal is clear: Don’t tell AI what to do. Show it once. That’s a much more natural way for people to transfer knowledge, and it’s a glimpse of how AI agents may eventually become personalized coworkers that learn your unique way of working instead of forcing you to learn theirs.
Sachin Singh tweet media
English
0
0
0
57
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
New in Claude Cowork: teach Claude a skill. Record your screen while you do a task, talk through it as you go, and Claude turns it into a skill it can run again. Find it under Record a skill in the + menu of the Claude desktop app. Available on Pro, Max, and Team plans.
Claude tweet media
English
1.2K
3.1K
42.5K
9.6M
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@Erling @grok Pleade give me stats about his records / stats. What would be his net worth? Compare that with other soccer players.
English
2
0
0
1.6K
Erling Haaland
Erling Haaland@Erling·
Thanks everyone for the love😂❤️ Life has changed forever! And I love it! Peace out
Erling Haaland tweet media
English
6.9K
21.4K
530.7K
5.7M
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@jack I have shared my thoughts here x.com/insachins/stat…
Sachin Singh@insachins

Buzz feels like one of the more interesting product launches in workplace software this year. For the last decade, our work apps have followed a familiar pattern: • Slack for conversations • GitHub for code • Notion for knowledge • AI copilots sitting in side panels waiting for prompts Buzz flips that model. Instead of humans chatting about AI, humans and AI agents become participants in the same conversation. Your agent can read context, complete tasks, coordinate with other agents, and report back inside the group chat itself. The bigger story isn’t another messaging app—it’s a new interface for work. Three things stand out: • Model-agnostic. You’re not locked into one AI provider, which matters as models improve almost monthly. • Open source + decentralized. That’s a refreshing contrast to the increasingly closed enterprise AI ecosystem. Organizations that care about ownership, privacy, or self-hosting will pay attention. • Self-sovereign architecture. If this is executed well, companies retain more control over their data and AI workflows instead of handing everything to a single SaaS vendor. The challenge, however, is enormous. Slack succeeded because everyone was already communicating there. GitHub succeeded because developers collaborated around code there. Buzz has to convince teams to change where work happens and how work happens. The network effects in enterprise software are brutal. Still, I think Jack Dorsey is betting on something bigger than chat. We’re moving from human-to-human collaboration to human + AI + AI collaboration. If every employee eventually has multiple AI agents working alongside them, today’s collaboration tools may start looking like email clients in a world that needs operating systems for autonomous work. Buzz might not replace Slack tomorrow. But it could be an early glimpse of what the workplace looks like when AI agents become first-class teammates instead of just assistants.

English
1
0
0
246
jack
jack@jack·
we're launching BUZZ! a new groupchat platform for teams of people and agents of all sizes, built to reduce our dependency on slack and github. model-agnostic, decentralized, self-sovereign, and open source. 🐝 buzz.xyz
English
752
1.4K
11.9K
3.5M
Kalshi
Kalshi@Kalshi·
JUST IN: BlackRock clients buy $116 million worth of Bitcoin
English
81
124
1.6K
75K
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@r0ck3t23 @grok is it possible for our phones to directly catch signal from the satellite? Or we will be always dependent on AT&T, Verizon etc?
English
1
1
4
701
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just spent seventeen billion dollars to make every cell tower on Earth a relic. Musk: “It will allow SpaceX to deliver high bandwidth connectivity directly from the satellites to the phones.” Not through towers. Not through cables. Not through any infrastructure on the ground. Directly from orbit to the phone in your pocket. For over a century, connectivity followed the same blueprint. Build a tower. Run a cable. Expand the network one piece of ground at a time. Coverage went where the money was. Where the population density justified the investment. Everywhere else got silence. Four billion people still don’t have reliable internet. Not because the technology doesn’t exist. Because no one could justify building a tower where they live. Connectivity was never a technology problem. It was a geography problem disguised as one. Musk: “The phones that are able to use the spectrum that was acquired probably start shipping in around two years.” Two years. Then the phone in your hand connects straight to space. No tower required. No carrier infrastructure between you and the signal. The entire telecom industry was built on one assumption. That connectivity requires ground infrastructure. Every carrier. Every contract. Every coverage map. All products of that assumption. Starlink just bypassed it from orbit. From orbit, every point on Earth is equidistant. The word “remote” only exists because connectivity was built from the ground up. From space, there is no remote. There is no coverage gap. There is no place on Earth harder to reach than any other. The ground decides who gets connected based on where they are. The sky doesn’t know the difference. Human potential was always distributed evenly across the planet. Access to information never was. The gap between those two facts is the greatest waste in human history. We spent a century deciding who deserved access to information based on where they happened to be born. Musk just made that question obsolete from 550 kilometers above the answer.
English
987
3.3K
16.7K
621.6K
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
The internet was built around population density. The next version may be built around planetary coverage. If every smartphone can eventually connect anywhere on Earth, “offline” becomes an exception instead of a location. That changes far more than telecom, it changes how AI, commerce, education, and governments reach people.
English
0
1
3
165
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
Every generation mistakes a new tool for the end of creativity. The printing press didn’t replace authors. It amplified them. The typewriter didn’t replace writers. It removed friction. Photography didn’t kill painting. It created entirely new art forms. Photoshop didn’t eliminate designers. It expanded what they could imagine. AI belongs in the same lineage. It’s not a substitute for curiosity, taste, judgment, or original thinking. It’s a multiplier for people who already have those qualities. The question has never been, “Is this real creativity?” The better question is, “What can humans create now that wasn’t possible before?” History suggests that every major creative tool is first dismissed as “cheating,” then adopted by professionals, and eventually becomes so commonplace that we forget it was ever controversial. AI won’t end creativity. It will redefine the baseline of what’s possible, just as every transformative tool before it has. The people who learn to direct it, rather than fear it, will shape the next generation of art, software, science, and business.
Sachin Singh tweet media
English
0
0
0
47
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@TechCrunch Have added my thinking here: x.com/insachins/stat…
Sachin Singh@insachins

Buzz feels like one of the more interesting product launches in workplace software this year. For the last decade, our work apps have followed a familiar pattern: • Slack for conversations • GitHub for code • Notion for knowledge • AI copilots sitting in side panels waiting for prompts Buzz flips that model. Instead of humans chatting about AI, humans and AI agents become participants in the same conversation. Your agent can read context, complete tasks, coordinate with other agents, and report back inside the group chat itself. The bigger story isn’t another messaging app—it’s a new interface for work. Three things stand out: • Model-agnostic. You’re not locked into one AI provider, which matters as models improve almost monthly. • Open source + decentralized. That’s a refreshing contrast to the increasingly closed enterprise AI ecosystem. Organizations that care about ownership, privacy, or self-hosting will pay attention. • Self-sovereign architecture. If this is executed well, companies retain more control over their data and AI workflows instead of handing everything to a single SaaS vendor. The challenge, however, is enormous. Slack succeeded because everyone was already communicating there. GitHub succeeded because developers collaborated around code there. Buzz has to convince teams to change where work happens and how work happens. The network effects in enterprise software are brutal. Still, I think Jack Dorsey is betting on something bigger than chat. We’re moving from human-to-human collaboration to human + AI + AI collaboration. If every employee eventually has multiple AI agents working alongside them, today’s collaboration tools may start looking like email clients in a world that needs operating systems for autonomous work. Buzz might not replace Slack tomorrow. But it could be an early glimpse of what the workplace looks like when AI agents become first-class teammates instead of just assistants.

English
0
0
0
187
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
Buzz feels like one of the more interesting product launches in workplace software this year. For the last decade, our work apps have followed a familiar pattern: • Slack for conversations • GitHub for code • Notion for knowledge • AI copilots sitting in side panels waiting for prompts Buzz flips that model. Instead of humans chatting about AI, humans and AI agents become participants in the same conversation. Your agent can read context, complete tasks, coordinate with other agents, and report back inside the group chat itself. The bigger story isn’t another messaging app—it’s a new interface for work. Three things stand out: • Model-agnostic. You’re not locked into one AI provider, which matters as models improve almost monthly. • Open source + decentralized. That’s a refreshing contrast to the increasingly closed enterprise AI ecosystem. Organizations that care about ownership, privacy, or self-hosting will pay attention. • Self-sovereign architecture. If this is executed well, companies retain more control over their data and AI workflows instead of handing everything to a single SaaS vendor. The challenge, however, is enormous. Slack succeeded because everyone was already communicating there. GitHub succeeded because developers collaborated around code there. Buzz has to convince teams to change where work happens and how work happens. The network effects in enterprise software are brutal. Still, I think Jack Dorsey is betting on something bigger than chat. We’re moving from human-to-human collaboration to human + AI + AI collaboration. If every employee eventually has multiple AI agents working alongside them, today’s collaboration tools may start looking like email clients in a world that needs operating systems for autonomous work. Buzz might not replace Slack tomorrow. But it could be an early glimpse of what the workplace looks like when AI agents become first-class teammates instead of just assistants.
Sachin Singh tweet mediaSachin Singh tweet media
English
0
0
1
577
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
EU AI: The only model where the paperwork has a larger context window than the AI.
Sachin Singh tweet media
English
1
1
0
33
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
I think we’re going to see more countries take this route. Australia has already banned social media for under-16s, arguing that the mental health risks outweigh the benefits. France is now doing the same for under-15s, citing concerns around online harassment, addiction, and child safety. On the other hand, countries like the US and UK haven’t gone for outright bans. Their approach has been to push parental controls, age verification, and hold platforms more accountable instead. The bigger question isn’t whether social media is good or bad. It’s whether governments should ban it for kids, or whether platforms should finally build products that are genuinely safe by design. I think this debate is only getting started.
English
0
0
2
42
Watcher.Guru
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru·
JUST IN: 🇫🇷 France bans social media for children under the age of 15.
Watcher.Guru tweet mediaWatcher.Guru tweet media
English
660
692
8.7K
491K
Watcher.Guru
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru·
JUST IN: Google $GOOGL launches three new AI models • Gemini 3.6 Flash • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite • Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Watcher.Guru tweet mediaWatcher.Guru tweet media
English
284
292
4.4K
482.2K
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@GoogleDeepMind @grok what’s the cost of per token for these three models and how this compares to other new models from frontier labs?
English
1
0
1
4.2K
Google DeepMind
Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMind·
We’re rolling out three new models to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale: 🔵 Gemini 3.6 Flash: It uses fewer tokens than 3.5 Flash to deliver higher quality work at the exact same cost. 🔵 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: A fast, cost-effective option for everyday tasks like processing documents and agentic search. 🔵 Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber: A cybersecurity model built to find and patch critical software vulnerabilities.
GIF
English
282
535
3.2K
1.8M
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@Kalshi @grok what is the import volume from Canada to USA and what percentage of that is from Hockey sticks?
English
1
0
0
299
Kalshi
Kalshi@Kalshi·
JUST IN: Trump puts 50% tariff on hockey sticks coming from Canada
English
95
67
1.2K
117.6K
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
@elonmusk @grok How many locations Robitaxi is already operational? Also, what’s the per mile cost compared to competitors such as Waymo, Uber etc?
English
1
1
2
1.4K
Sachin Singh
Sachin Singh@insachins·
This is a landmark settlement for AI—not because of the dollar amount, but because it gives the industry one of its clearest legal signals yet. For years, the biggest question has been: Can AI companies train on copyrighted material? This case begins to separate two very different issues: The legality of model training. The legality of how the training data was obtained. That distinction could shape the next decade of AI development. The message is becoming clearer: innovation isn’t being stopped, but data provenance now matters. Companies that invest in licensed, permissioned, and well-documented datasets will likely have a long-term advantage over those relying on legally questionable sources. In many ways, this could become one of the defining legal precedents for foundation models—similar to how earlier internet copyright cases shaped the evolution of search engines and digital media. The AI race is no longer just about better models or cheaper inference. It’s increasingly about building models on data that can withstand legal scrutiny.
Sachin Singh tweet media
English
0
0
0
21