InsideChainer

@General_Sentali @orelings Read the white paper😅 “Buying UORE through the canonical Uniswap v4 pool automatically mints Orelings to your wallet.”

@orelings I can't stake my claimed uORE

Coming soon…

@MeltedMindz @Raerol420 @uhootdotart “Are you joking? Or is this your first day in the memecoin world?”

@Raerol420 @uhootdotart Source?

@MeClaudeDEV @MederioNahal @BitcoinBenny69 @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 @dev__noah New wallets are typically dedicated gambling wallets people create a fresh wallet, fund it with 0.1–0.2 ETH, make a few buys, and move the profits out. You constantly see this in lottery-style projects.”

@insidechainer @MederioNahal @BitcoinBenny69 @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 @dev__noah It was over 400 a few hrs ago

Nobody is watching this crypto now Nobody talks about it .... But they should because it's looking like a takeoff ripple:native

@MeClaudeDEV @MederioNahal @BitcoinBenny69 @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 @dev__noah I thought it would take a bit longer for a new hit this time……

@MeClaudeDEV @MederioNahal @BitcoinBenny69 @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 @dev__noah “The motherlode was not hit. It’s still listed on the website?

What is getting me now is the tom foolery of the motherlode, some other random wallet got it a few hrs ago, with another "0.1" random buy I have been looking at wallets that have like 300+ orelings staked, and they have not gotten anything. It seems sketch tbh, last motherlode I gave them the benefit of the doubt. but yeah. not the best look imo

@MederioNahal @BitcoinBenny69 @MeClaudeDEV @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 If @dev__noah improves the UI/UX and launches a strong liquid staking platform at the right time, this could still become a success. The whales and launch-hype crowd are gone already. Even Upeg and other v4 hook projects had early issues with high gas fees and UI/UX bugs.

@BitcoinBenny69 @MeClaudeDEV @_g_x_g @flaviusmg89 How about now?

@avc_codes @lo0pio Don’t do it!

@lo0pio Is there a public snapshot sheet? I DCA’d and bought more ethereum:0x20ea861b3acec90d3a15b4755d9a1cf1f161496e after the exploit, so I’m not sure what the exact snapshot amount was. How many old tokens should I send for the 1:1 migration? Thanks team!

lo0p Relaunch Announcement Earlier today, an attacker exploited the absence of a per-block liquidation limit in our contracts. Within a single block, 24 positions were liquidated and cross-pool arbitrage was used to extract approximately 3.4 ETH in profit. While the protocol’s core math functioned as intended, this design flaw exposed LPs and borrowers to unnecessary risk. To address this issue, we are deploying updated lo0p contracts with the necessary fixes and relaunching the protocol. 1:1 Airdrop To ensure existing LO0P holders are not affected, we will conduct a full 1:1 airdrop. In addition, we have taken a snapshot from the block immediately before the exploit, and users who were liquidated during the attack will also receive their tokens back. Please send your old LO0P tokens to the following address: 0x1D73f1def90C6e23dF4D7Ff7Dff377a9c973686f An equivalent amount of new LO0P tokens will be automatically sent to the same wallet from the new contract. You will have 24 hours to send your LO0P tokens. Once this period ends, the new system will go live. Tokens sent before the relaunch time will also be included in the snapshot. New contract addresses and airdrop distribution details will be announced through our official channels.

@RunesPunks $rPEG

@RunesPunks $rPEG

@CryptoHermano14 It proves this is real hardware, not a simulator. Simulators return perfect results instantly, this took minutes and shows a 3.7% error rate that matches IQM Garnet's exact specs. You can verify it yourself for free.

@insidechainer Wat heb je hieraan dan?

@unicorev4 @R_obert82 You guys are done, bro. Too long silence on your channels.

@R_obert82 We were focused on delivering, and we apologize for the delay.

We know people were waiting, and we appreciate the patience. We took extra time because this is the first playable layer of UNICORE, and we wanted to be careful with it. The goal was not just to launch something fast, but to make sure the core game loop felt solid, understandable, and worth building on. So far, we’ve delivered everything we said we would deliver, and this won’t be different. Arena is another step in turning UNICORE from a collection into a larger ecosystem with real utility, gameplay, and token-based mechanics. Next, we’re moving toward the UNICORE launchpad and an FPS with token-game mechanics. To everyone who has believed in us, supported us, and stayed patient while we build: thank you. We don’t take that trust lightly, and we’ll keep working to earn it.

@MehebubV171 @unicorev4 Its a scam bro, I believed it too

@unicorev4 where are you...why yours token dump to dump....?

Working on fixing a few bugs before the deployment of ou arena. Sorry forte delay!

@unicorev4 Good and safe development takes time!

@xiskraps @unicorev4 Those people are coming back, they never learn. The team remains transparent, continues to build, and consistently shares updates.

@unicorev4 How are u intending to do the marketing since most people are left now ?

⚔️ 🛡️ 🦄 ⏱️

@unicorev4 @DavaaNaranbold @GuruB342 I can’t open the website; I thought it might be due to the renouncement process. Is that correct?

@DavaaNaranbold @GuruB342 He's asking gpt to make more fud content

$UNICORE token ownership renouncement: complete and verifiable on chain The team has permanently given up admin control of the UnicoreToken contract. The owner of 0xd4e43c86334940a246daae8908c9b3cfb97c6817 now points at a small burner contract whose source code contains a single public function. Why a burner contract was needed UnicoreToken uses a two step ownership transfer pattern (the safer kind that prevents typo bricking). The current owner proposes a successor, and only that successor can finalize by calling acceptOwner. Sending ownership to a dead wallet like 0x000...dEaD therefore does not work: the dead address has no private key to call acceptOwner, so the transfer never finalizes and the original owner remains in charge in practice. We needed a real contract to be on the receiving end. We wrote a minimal contract called UnicoreOwnershipBurner. Its complete public surface is a single acceptOwner function. There is no transferOwner, no setter, no upgrade path, no fallback, no receive function, no rescue method. Once it becomes the owner of the token, the burner has no path to ever call any privileged function on the token. The administrative side of the contract is mathematically dead. Transactions Burner contract deploy: etherscan.io/tx/0xb838e4385… Propose burner as new owner of the token: etherscan.io/tx/0xf2b0e4b60… Finalize transfer (irreversible): etherscan.io/tx/0xa8c7b065d… Burner contract on Etherscan, verified source: etherscan.io/address/0x4613… Verification in thirty seconds Open the token's read tab: #readContract" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">etherscan.io/address/0xd4e4… 1. Read owner(). Returns 0x4613bde1d5FB42CCF8a010bce05Cd15a67bE4503 (the burner, not the team). 2. Open the burner address on Etherscan and switch to the Contract tab. The verified source is roughly 50 lines including comments. Confirm there is no setter, no admin function, no upgrade path. 3. Read burner.renounced(). Returns true. 4. Read burner.renouncedAtBlock(). Returns 25021755, the block where the renouncement finalized.

@cryptovenusrcr @unicorev4 Don’t do it, it’s better this way.

@unicorev4 Can you open up tg again? For community vibes

@GuruB342 @unicorev4 You don’t have enough money to buy one and you regret not buying the bottom.

@unicorev4 Scam is coming.

$UCORE Ownership Renouncement Underway We're in the process of permanently renouncing ownership of both core UNICORE contracts: • UnicoreToken — 0xd4e43c86334940a246daae8908c9b3cfb97c6817 • UnicoreHook — 0x80a26a3650d03b6332f0d88450D5c396a2C880Cc ⏱ Why this is taking a few hours UNICORE was deployed with a TWO-STEP ownership transfer pattern (transferOwner → acceptOwner). This is the safer pattern that prevents typo-bricking, but it means we cannot simply send ownership to 0xdead, that address has no private key to call acceptOwner, so the transfer would never finalize and we'd technically still be the owner (which defeats the entire purpose). The correct approach is to deploy a small dedicated "burner" contract whose only public function is acceptOwner(), with no setter, no upgrade path, no fallback, no rescue function // nothing. Once that burner becomes the owner of our contracts, there is no path on chain for the admin surface to ever be exercised again. We're writing, testing, and verifying that burner now. We're taking our time on purpose. We're not going to break the protocol just to ship faster, every reward in flight, every active slot, every pool position has to keep working flawlessly during and after this. 🔍 What you'll be able to verify on Etherscan once we're done 1. token.owner() → returns the burner contract address (not our wallet) 2. hook.owner() → returns the burner contract address (not our wallet) 3. Burner contract source on Etherscan → ~50 lines, ONE function, no admin surface whatsoever. The compiled bytecode hash matches the verified source. 4. burner.renounced() → true (with a block-number timestamp showing exactly when the transfer landed) 5. Try to call any privileged function from our deployer wallet // transaction reverts with Unauthorized Anyone can do these checks in 30 seconds. No trust required. ✅ What keeps working forever after renouncement Everything user-facing is permissionless by design and unaffected: • Swaps on Uniswap v4 (3% hook tax fires automatically) • hook.normalize() — anyone can push accumulated tax to the reward pool • token.withdrawRewards() — every holder claims their own ETH • Slot transfers, marketplace listings, swap-based slot mints, all of it ❌ What we permanently give up • setMaxWallet — the per-wallet cap is locked at its current value • setAssetBaseURI — the IPFS gateway URL is frozen (we've pinned the artwork redundantly in advance to ensure long-term durability) • transferOwner — ownership cannot be moved anywhere else, ever These are the costs we're accepting to give the community the strongest possible non-rug guarantee. 📡 Updates We'll post here the moment the deploy lands, with: - Burner contract addresses + Etherscan verification links - transferOwner / acceptOwner transaction hashes - A step-by-step verification guide — UNICORE team

@randomartz3 Are you sharing Solana bundle scam now? #auntie

Pump Fun Token Auntie Is Up 3.5X From My Call youtu.be/xOrKJBkPhdY?si… #auntie #unc solana:ACtfUWtgvaXrQGNMiohTusi5jcx5RJf5zwu9aAxkpump solana:GKkRKpLC9pPYkYqKfnQCvHiMRVhbeVitgobsvxBpump #memecoin #memecoins #solana #sol #PumpFun

@KcusNemow @Sykodelic_ What you want is different from what is actually going to happen.

@Sykodelic_ There will be one more drawndown to retest Lows, then 93k-160k the end.

This is all you need to know. If we close on a breakout like this and above HTF Bullish structure, on the weekly... The bottom is in. Not after $90k, $105K, or whatever. This would confirm a deviation and reclaim on HTF. New highs will then be in the sights over this year. This will also confirm that this is not the 4 year cycle bear market everyone expects, and it will prove that the cycle is driven by the macro, not time. That is the tweet.

@Chain_AlphaX @randomartz3 Just like predicting ROAR to a $1 billion market cap or BONE to $100? you’re genuinely good at calling these predictions.

@randomartz3 Finally, a take Wall Street can actually *afford*. WAGMI.

This is another one of my predictions. Wall Street will start buying infrastructure and crypto communities. It's cheaper to do so then to create their own from scratch.