FIG

I’ve seen casual listeners and people from other fandoms on TikTok buying tickets to see LNGSHOT. That means they might not be fans yet, but they could become fans after seeing them perform❤️

Regarding Emotional Oranges: The mere attempt to explore a collaboration is not automatically a breach of contract, and it is even less likely to be treated as a serious breach if: 1. No song was ever released. 2. No final collaboration agreement was executed. 3. No commercial activity actually occurred. 4. The alleged collaboration was later clarified as involving her sister, Olivia, not Danielle herself. 5. Danielle and the other members genuinely believed their contracts had already been terminated. In the ADOR-NewJeans dispute, that question is complicated because the members have consistently maintained that they lawfully terminated their contracts. If a party believes a contract has been validly terminated, actions taken afterward are generally not viewed by that party as contractual breaches but as exercising their freedom after termination. That said, courts usually distinguish between preparatory discussions or negotiations, and an actual commercial performance. A casual discussion, exploratory contact, or unrealized proposal is generally much weaker evidence than an actual released song, signed contract, paid appearance, endorsement, or concert. It is a fact that no Emotional Oranges x Danielle collaboration was released and that Azad of Emotional Oranges clarified on their official Instagram that the project involved Olivia Marsh, not Danielle, then the evidentiary value of that incident would likely be limited. It may be used by ADOR to support a broader argument that the members were seeking independent activities, but standing alone it would not necessarily prove a material breach. “Trying” to collaborate is not the same thing as actually collaborating, and the absence of a released song or finalized deal substantially weakens any breach-of-contract argument based on that incident alone.