Intentauri

@zerocipher002 Why spend 3 days on just poc when the other sr already used ai to poc as quick as possible, why would you be manually writing poc yourself in this era , when you know what you want

Spent 3 days building a proof of concept for a critical in a bug bounty. Full exploit chain. Exact steps showing how to drain the pool. Marked duplicate. Another researcher submitted the same finding hours before me. 72 hours of work. Zero payout. On to the next one.

@marmaduke091 You just talk without thinking

Best proof Anthropic has the best internal models: The Pentagon would rather invoke the Defense Production Act than use someone else's AI.

@AsimPaudel4 @trekedge Don’t use this sense of yours to cross the road.

@trekedge Yeah thats great but you are providing Codex for free.

Tell me when we hit 10x growth since the beginning of the year

@tycnio @btibor91 It was actually communicated, just didn’t take it serious, check Sam tweets

@btibor91 why the fuck would you not communicate change of model to users?

If you're having issues with Codex, your account might have been rerouted to a different, less-capable reasoning model OpenAI confirmed this happens when their systems detect potential cyber activity as part of their efforts to protect against cyber abuse, and you can go to chatgpt[.]com/cyber to verify and regain GPT-5.3-Codex access through their "Trusted Access for Cyber" flow OpenAI says they plan to add notifications across all Codex surfaces (TUI, extension, app) so users are aware when they are being rerouted, and will add a dedicated button in their feedback flow for reporting false positive classifications

@pratikbodkhe @reach_vb Try to use your sense for once. Codex doesn’t do this. It’s not everything you chase clout with

@reach_vb until it hallucinates an API endpoint that doesn't exist and you spend 20 minutes debugging fake code

you can just codex things!

@sarahwooders Don’t use this sense of yours to cross road.

@flavioAd Damn there is still more?

Didn’t expect the article to blow up like this! thanks you so much for all the support I’ve got so many things I can’t wait to share with you (once I’m allowed)

@Angaisb_ You are really enjoying this, and a lot more to enjoy, it’s a really great product and model

GPT-5.3-Codex with image gen skill (NBP) I'm loving this model so much. This is one-shot

@crypto_nobody_ @NeoAIForecast @chatgpt21 lol OpenAI has bigger guns regardless, you should know this, you haven’t even witnessed imo model

@NeoAIForecast @chatgpt21 Meanwhile, Claude holding their ace card close thats probably at 90% or something crazy

Claude 4.6 Opus claimed state of the art on terminal bench with a score of 65.4% and held onto their lead for a whopping 5 minutes 🤯 Gpt 5.3 dropped and crushed their score with 77.3%

@TalkingMusicz @soholev @sama Why won’t it be interesting for normal users? Have you tried the codex app?

@intentaurixyz @soholev @sama I’m saying, there’s a very low chance codex is interesting for normal users. What “normal” people care about has not been a priority for OAI for months

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.

@TalkingMusicz @soholev @sama Normal user? So a normal user can’t decide to do some coding? That doesn’t require them to have a separate subscription for? And you guys are feeling like codex doesn’t have users

@intentaurixyz @soholev @sama There’s almost zero chance “normal users” care about coding tho

@ticker_thoughts @sama Seems you are living under a rock

@fabi_dev @sama You don’t pay for ChatGPT?

@intentaurixyz @sama I don‘t want ads in any way. That was my statement. I read it and I understand but I simply don’t want it

@udaysy @soholev @sama You see build workflow around it? With codex app you can just do things right away easily, like easily

@soholev @intentaurixyz @sama mcp + hooks + skills is where the gap keeps growing. codex is clean but claude codes extensibility is hard to match once you build workflows around it

@soholev @sama Clearly you didn’t use it well because you love the glazing Claude does to you, people love the glazing hence think it better whereas codex is very much ahead if you really use it

@intentaurixyz @sama Codex was the first CLI coding tool I tried and I was amazed by it, especially because it is open source. But somehow, it’s always playing catchup with Claude Code.

@ticker_thoughts @sama lol lead to who

@fabi_dev @sama Did you read how they want to implement the ads? I guess you did not making say this

@sama Seems like someone is mad. However, Anthropic is right on this one. Ads in LLMs you use to get an objective opinion are a dealbreaker. Understandable from both sides but I prefer not having ads

@soholev @sama Codex already has the power users building things needed

@sama Wow, quite an outrage, did gpt-5.3 write it? But, an underdog Anthropic is killing it in codegen and workflow orchestration, mostly due to an incredible harness. People install codex app to play around with it same way as antigravity. Hype will die off

@Exuma72 @VraserX Think man, why would they leave? Is OpenAI the first platform to do this? You guys said the same thing when X was doing this and see where they are. Just stop and think for a seconds

@VraserX As soon as they integrate advertising, the users are gone.

Funny how some people on X keep insisting OpenAI is “falling behind.” Meanwhile, ChatGPT is pulling hundreds of millions of DAUs while Gemini is still stuck in the tens. DAU = Daily Active Users. You know, actual humans opening the app every single day. OpenAI isn’t just winning. It’s obliterating Gemini.