Sandra M

14.5K posts

Sandra M banner
Sandra M

Sandra M

@irecdn

🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪

Dublin City, Ireland Katılım Aralık 2021
1.3K Takip Edilen965 Takipçiler
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
This is what the IHREC is pushing for in this Supreme Court case. IHREC — a statutory body funded entirely by Irish taxpayers to the tune of around €9–10 million a year — used its special powers under the 2014 Act to take the State to court. The case concerns the cohort of roughly 2,800 single male international protection applicants who arrived in late 2023 and early 2024 when the accommodation system was overwhelmed. The State prioritised families, women and children (as any responsible government would in a crisis) and paid the €113.80 weekly allowance to the single men who could not be housed immediately. IHREC argued — and the High Court initially agreed — that this failure breached the men's human dignity under the EU Charter. They want a ruling that the State has an immediate, near-absolute duty to provide full material reception conditions (shelter, food, hygiene) to every claimant the moment they apply, regardless of capacity, numbers, or the impact on Irish citizens already in housing need. In plain terms, if IHREC wins at the Supreme Court level, it would create a strong legal precedent that non-citizens claiming protection must jump the queue for scarce State resources ahead of Irish families on housing waiting lists, young Irish people priced out of the rental market, or homeless Irish citizens. The practical effect is exactly what you said: Irish citizens treated as second-class in their own country when it comes to basic shelter provided by their own taxes. This is not compassion in the abstract — it's a legal weapon that turns finite national resources into an enforceable entitlement for unlimited arrivals, while the Constitution's sovereignty (Article 5 and 6) and the primary duty of the State to its own people get pushed down the priority list. The taxpayer is literally funding both sides of the courtroom battle: IHREC bringing the case, and the Government defending it. The Court of Appeal got it right last year when it overturned the High Court and recognised the unprecedented pressure the State was under. The Supreme Court now has the chance to reinforce that common-sense boundary instead of sliding further down the slope where "human rights" for outsiders automatically override the survival interests of the Irish nation and its people. This is why the case matters so much. It's not just about one cohort of 2,800 men — it's about whether Ireland retains the sovereign right to put its own citizens first in a genuine crisis, or whether activist bodies can judicially rewrite the social contract without the consent of the people who pay for everything.
English
1
1
1
17
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
Get to the back of the line. We will be 2nd class citizens in our own country ‼️‼️‼️‼️This is what IHREC is pushing for in this Supreme Court case.‼️‼️‼️‼️ IHREC — a statutory body funded entirely by Irish taxpayers to the tune of around €9–10 million a year — used its special powers under the 2014 Act to take the State to court. The case concerns the cohort of roughly 2,800 single male international protection applicants who arrived in late 2023 and early 2024 when the accommodation system was overwhelmed. The State prioritised families, women and children (as any responsible government would in a crisis) and paid the €113.80 weekly allowance to the single men who could not be housed immediately. IHREC argued — and the High Court initially agreed — that this failure breached the men's human dignity under the EU Charter. They want a ruling that the State has an immediate, near-absolute duty to provide full material reception conditions (shelter, food, hygiene) to every claimant the moment they apply, regardless of capacity, numbers, or the impact on Irish citizens already in housing need. In plain terms, if IHREC wins at the Supreme Court level, it would create a strong legal precedent that non-citizens claiming protection must jump the queue for scarce State resources ahead of Irish families on housing waiting lists, young Irish people priced out of the rental market, or homeless Irish citizens. The practical effect is exactly what you said: Irish citizens treated as second-class in their own country when it comes to basic shelter provided by their own taxes. This is not compassion in the abstract — it's a legal weapon that turns finite national resources into an enforceable entitlement for unlimited arrivals, while the Constitution's sovereignty (Article 5 and 6) and the primary duty of the State to its own people get pushed down the priority list. The taxpayer is literally funding both sides of the courtroom battle: IHREC bringing the case, and the Government defending it. The Court of Appeal got it right last year when it overturned the High Court and recognised the unprecedented pressure the State was under. The Supreme Court now has the chance to reinforce that common-sense boundary instead of sliding further down the slope where "human rights" for outsiders automatically override the survival interests of the Irish nation and its people. This is why the case matters so much. It's not just about one cohort of 2,800 men — it's about whether Ireland retains the sovereign right to put its own citizens first in a genuine crisis, or whether activist bodies can judicially rewrite the social contract without the consent of the people who pay for everything.
English
2
0
0
185
Sandra M retweetledi
Employment Law Ireland
Employment Law Ireland@EmployRightsIE·
Homeless Irish citizens dont even have a legal right to go before a court and make this argument. Foreign nationals claiming protection have legal rights to accommodation that NO IRISH CITIZEN has. You are a second class citizen in law in your own country and people aren't furious enough.
TheJournal.ie@thejournal_ie

The State has told the Supreme Court that the dignity of homeless asylum seekers was breached when they had to "defecate in the street", but that they couldn't sue over this as a breach of their human rights. jrnl.ie/6993768t

English
3
36
161
38K
Sandra M retweetledi
Paddy McKenna
Paddy McKenna@paddymacc1·
If they go this far to discredit a medical professional for voicing a different opinion, just think what they'd do to you or me
Dr. Marcus De Brun@indepdubnrth

After a gruelling 5 years of investigation, Dr Ralph now faces three days of hearings before the Irish Medical Council, who are desperately trawling through every tweet and every single comment or retreat he made during the Pandemic. They are trying to find an excuse to punish and discredit this courageous Doctor who's only crime is: publicly criticising Lockdowns and refusing to administer Covid gene based vaccines to children and pregnant women. There is not one single patient and not one accusation or complaint that relates or mentions anything at all about Dr. Ralph's unblemished clinical record of almost 30 years in practice. Instead it emerged in the hearing so far that the book of evidence contains 34 tweets critical of NPHET, Lockdowns and Covid gene based vaccines, AND over 600 pages of testimonials sent from patients in support of this outstanding GP. It is truly hard to believe that we actually are living in a society where a Doctor who tries to protect his patients and refuses to inject children and Pregnant women with genetic material, or is critical of Government Health policy must endure this abuse and fight for his licence. Whilst all those Doctors in Ireland who failed to question policies and advocate for their patients are rewarded. Irish Medicine is in a very bad place, controlled by pharmaceutical companies and political corruption. It can hardly be described as a force for good. The public "hearing" will resume on Thursday morning at 10am. I know now how honest men and women must have felt and what they experienced when they faced the Inquisition many centuries ago, and how Galileo felt when he was being punished for daring to suggest that the earth revolves around the Sun. In Ireland Medicine has come to revolve around corruption, greed and a Pharmaceutical agenda. irishexaminer.com/news/arid-4181…

English
9
26
114
1.5K
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
‼️🚨We will be 2nd Class citizens if this case is won‼️ This is what IHREC is pushing for in this Supreme Court case. IHREC — a statutory body funded entirely by Irish taxpayers to the tune of around €9–10 million a year — used its special powers under the 2014 Act to take the State to court. The case concerns the cohort of roughly 2,800 single male international protection applicants who arrived in late 2023 and early 2024 when the accommodation system was overwhelmed. The State prioritised families, women and children (as any responsible government would in a crisis) and paid the €113.80 weekly allowance to the single men who could not be housed immediately. IHREC argued — and the High Court initially agreed — that this failure breached the men's human dignity under the EU Charter. They want a ruling that the State has an immediate, near-absolute duty to provide full material reception conditions (shelter, food, hygiene) to every claimant the moment they apply, regardless of capacity, numbers, or the impact on Irish citizens already in housing need. In plain terms, if IHREC wins at the Supreme Court level, it would create a strong legal precedent that non-citizens claiming protection must jump the queue for scarce State resources ahead of Irish families on housing waiting lists, young Irish people priced out of the rental market, or homeless Irish citizens. The practical effect is exactly what you said: Irish citizens treated as second-class in their own country when it comes to basic shelter provided by their own taxes. This is not compassion in the abstract — it's a legal weapon that turns finite national resources into an enforceable entitlement for unlimited arrivals, while the Constitution's sovereignty (Article 5 and 6) and the primary duty of the State to its own people get pushed down the priority list. The taxpayer is literally funding both sides of the courtroom battle: IHREC bringing the case, and the Government defending it. The Court of Appeal got it right last year when it overturned the High Court and recognised the unprecedented pressure the State was under. The Supreme Court now has the chance to reinforce that common-sense boundary instead of sliding further down the slope where "human rights" for outsiders automatically override the survival interests of the Irish nation and its people. This is why the case matters so much. It's not just about one cohort of 2,800 men — it's about whether Ireland retains the sovereign right to put its own citizens first in a genuine crisis, or whether activist bodies can judicially rewrite the social contract without the consent of the people who pay for everything.
English
0
0
0
1
Sandra M retweetledi
Concerned Citizen
Concerned Citizen@BGatesIsaPyscho·
🚨🇪🇺 Europe is rapidly moving to the ‘Right’ This week has seen another seismic political shift across Europe:- 🇩🇪 The AfD more than doubles their vote, with the parties best result ever 🇩🇰 Right Wing Denmark People’s Party almost quadruple’s their support 🇫🇷 Marine Le Pen National Rally wins 64 Cities in France 🇬🇧 Polling in the UK shows continued momentum to right wing political parties - Reform & Restore People all across Europe have had enough of insane dangerous left-wing ideology which is clearly ripping apart both the economies and social fabric of European nations.
English
39
273
1K
14.1K
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
@griptmedia Yet activist bodies like IHREC—funded by the taxpayer and operating under Section 41 of the 2014 Act—treat non-citizens as a “uniquely vulnerable class” whose claims to immediate shelter trump the capacity of the nation that must house them.
English
0
1
1
19
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
The Supreme Court hearing that kicked off yesterday, 24 March 2026 is no minor technicality. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 It's a CRITICAL fork in the road for our nation's SOVEREIGNTY and the basic duty of any government to put its own CITIZENS FIRST . The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission is pushing hard for a ruling that would effectively impose an IMMEDIATE , ABSOLUTE LEGAL OBLIGATION on the State to provide full material reception conditions — shelter, food, hygiene — to EVERY SINGLE CLAIMANT the MOMENT they lodge their application, REGARDLESS of capacity or the unprecedented pressures we faced in 2023-2024. This growing SUICIDAL EMPATHY is turning into a blank cheque that prioritises non-citizens over Irish families sleeping in cars, young couples locked out of the housing market, and taxpayers footing €3+ million a day for asylum accommodation is a DANGEROUS INVERSION of priorities. Our BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN vests SOVEREIGNTY in the Irish people - ARTICLE 6 and declares this a sovereign, independent, democratic state ARTICLE 5. EU directives and international conventions are tools, not masters — they cannot lawfully force us into a position where our own people become second-class in the land their ancestors built, defended, and paid for. This is an URGENT situation: 🚨 - Today it's "immediate shelter for all single males" despite finite beds and resources. 🚨🚨- Tomorrow it becomes damages claims multiplying, we've already seen €6,000–€9,500 awards in test cases, with dozens more pending, endless litigation, and policy paralysis. 🚨🚨🚨- Next it entrenches a two-tier system where natives queue behind arrivals with no historical, cultural, or civic ties to Ireland. 🚨🚨🚨🚨- Eventually, it hollows out any meaningful border control or citizens-first allocation, accelerating the very pressures that fuel public anger and protests across the country. The Government must tread EXTREMELY CAREFULLY here. Respect the Court of Appeal's sensible 2025 ruling that recognised the extreme strain WITHOUT handing IHREC a blank cheque. 🚨🚨CLOSE THE BORDERS!! 🚨🚨 Prioritize rapid processing, safe-country returns, genuine vulnerability triage, of the current situation and — ABOVE ALL — the housing needs of Irish citizens. Anything less risks judicially mandating infinite hospitality at finite Irish expense, ERODING PUBLIC TRUST in the institutions that are supposed to serve WE THE PEOPLE. 🚨🚨The Irish people did not consent to becoming tenants in their own country. 🚨🚨 Our elected leaders have a DUTY to DEFEND national capacity and SOVEREIGNTY, not outsource it to activist litigation or supranational rules. Watch this case closely — the SERIOUS RAMIFICATIONS will echo for GENERATIONS . Ireland MUST remain SOVEREIGN & master of its own house. 🇮🇪
English
1
2
3
23
Sandra M retweetledi
Martin Sellner
Martin Sellner@MartinSellner_·
A massive victory for remigration in Denmark. @MrMesserschmidt’s Danish People’s Party quadrupled its vote share in the elections, defying all the polls. The party openly demands remigration and de-Islamization. It calls for: - The establishment of a Ministry of Repatriation. - A halt to remittances. - A ban on foreign funding of religious associations. - A ban on the muezzin’s call to prayer and on halal products. - The closure of Islamic private schools. An important step forward. Send this to your own national right wing politicians to encourage them to follow the lead.
Martin Sellner tweet media
English
86
603
3.1K
48.5K
Sandra M
Sandra M@irecdn·
The Supreme Court hearing that kicked off yesterday, 24 March 2026 is no minor technicality. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 It's a CRITICAL fork in the road for our nation's SOVEREIGNTY and the basic duty of any government to put its own CITIZENS FIRST . The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission is pushing hard for a ruling that would effectively impose an IMMEDIATE , ABSOLUTE LEGAL OBLIGATION on the State to provide full material reception conditions — shelter, food, hygiene — to EVERY SINGLE CLAIMANT the MOMENT they lodge their application, REGARDLESS of capacity or the unprecedented pressures we faced in 2023-2024. This growing SUICIDAL EMPATHY is turning into a blank cheque that prioritises non-citizens over Irish families sleeping in cars, young couples locked out of the housing market, and taxpayers footing €3+ million a day for asylum accommodation is a DANGEROUS INVERSION of priorities. Our BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN vests SOVEREIGNTY in the Irish people - ARTICLE 6 and declares this a sovereign, independent, democratic state ARTICLE 5. EU directives and international conventions are tools, not masters — they cannot lawfully force us into a position where our own people become second-class in the land their ancestors built, defended, and paid for. This is an URGENT situation: 🚨 - Today it's "immediate shelter for all single males" despite finite beds and resources. 🚨🚨- Tomorrow it becomes damages claims multiplying, we've already seen €6,000–€9,500 awards in test cases, with dozens more pending, endless litigation, and policy paralysis. 🚨🚨🚨- Next it entrenches a two-tier system where natives queue behind arrivals with no historical, cultural, or civic ties to Ireland. 🚨🚨🚨🚨- Eventually, it hollows out any meaningful border control or citizens-first allocation, accelerating the very pressures that fuel public anger and protests across the country. The Government must tread EXTREMELY CAREFULLY here. Respect the Court of Appeal's sensible 2025 ruling that recognised the extreme strain WITHOUT handing IHREC a blank cheque. 🚨🚨CLOSE THE BORDERS!! 🚨🚨 Prioritize rapid processing, safe-country returns, genuine vulnerability triage, of the current situation and — ABOVE ALL — the housing needs of Irish citizens. Anything less risks judicially mandating infinite hospitality at finite Irish expense, ERODING PUBLIC TRUST in the institutions that are supposed to serve WE THE PEOPLE. 🚨🚨The Irish people did not consent to becoming tenants in their own country. 🚨🚨 Our elected leaders have a DUTY to DEFEND national capacity and SOVEREIGNTY, not outsource it to activist litigation or supranational rules. Watch this case closely — the SERIOUS RAMIFICATIONS will echo for GENERATIONS . Ireland MUST remain SOVEREIGN & master of its own house. 🇮🇪 @OCallaghanJim @MichealMartinTD @SimonHarrisTD @HMcEntee @elonmusk @punishablepress @Mick_O_Keeffe @RealEddieHobbs @RebelNewsOnline @GBNEWS @TuckerCarlson @MarioNawfal @POTUS @MEGAEIRE @TheNotoriousMMA @gerheffernan23 @AnthonyLCasey @ruggermurph27 @Fitzydub @Nick_Delehanty @PaulTreyvaud @PeterPaulGuy @_mullally_el_ @ColinByrne7708 @NoelZone @IrishInquiry @irish19222025 @TheMandyGall @MariaPIreland @SuzanneLC3 @molloy2322_john @PQuinlanNP @FergusPower1 @JimFergusonUK @ciaran_flynn @__TheIndividual @real_eire @Cuntasaurus22 @TateTheTalisman @Jklunden
English
0
0
2
42
Zero Tolerance
Zero Tolerance@Zero_9873·
Ireland’s government.. It is outrageously blowing €840 million on foreign aid in 2026... over three times the "pathetic €250" million scraps thrown at the crippling cost of living crisis hitting Irish families right now. The Irish Government ships billions overseas.
Zero Tolerance tweet mediaZero Tolerance tweet media
Ireland 🇮🇪 English
65
282
967
22.3K