Flo

hypersol.

whats the next hot top after ai gonna be?

@OndoFinance lower

The market closed. Ondo Stocks kept trading. This weekend, tokenized Google had two very different prices depending on the liquidity source, with GOOGLon settling 38x cheaper. Ondo Stocks trade with deep liquidity, even on weekends.

@SolanaFloor @solana reject volume, embrace liquidity

NEWS: @Solana flipped Binance in DEX spot trading volume on July 11, but the surge was largely driven by a pricing bug exploit on ZeroFi's DRAM/USDC pool. Nearly 400K flash loan transactions generated over $4.7B in volume, with roughly $45K stolen.

@Havochl_ guess we'll see $NEAR @ 142$

People treating $HYPE at $60 the same way they treated $HYPE at $20 back in January, guess we'll see $200+ in the next six months.

@EmanAbio -0.11456°/-79.06132°

privacy is not optional. it's a prerequisite for adoption

@ryonnixon rh is ngmi; in fact: worst of the worst

Vlad can just run the Solana playbook, but with 27M retail users. The more I think about it, the more and more I fomo Robinhood chain.

@bencirc @solana open to sharing those internal analyses?

@isqrt64 @solana Competition is already focused on authenticated searchers but it's mathematically more profitable to set a fixed percentage than to use an OFA (based on internal analyses).

A monetization layer must be competitive to efficiently monetize transactions on @solana. There is no clear leader in transaction monetization on Solana, we are going to become that leader. Here's our proposal: - Competitiveness with the top players - Fully verifiable on-chain transparency - A clear voice for companies looking to monetize their transactions To scale this vision quickly, we're exploring the possibility of raising funds and identifying potential partners. Want to join the journey? 👇

@PratikKala eth could have won if it wasn't for l2s

Robinhood chain: The section shows the operating costs that L2s pay to Ethereum. Note average cost per day source: l2beat

hyperliquid.

@binji_x simple as that: what goes around, comes around

Please explain why MEV is good, what’s ONE good point about getting inexplicably bamboozled while doing a transaction? It’s like moving to London, getting your phone snatched, and then everyone celebrating the snatcher for being a chad. I thought this was a SAFE SPACE man.

@mert many such cases

the cypherpunks have paved the way for the greatest upcoming movement of all: cyphercapitalism

@world_xyz @vladtenev robinhood has made no motion to provide public node snapshots

i was at dinner with a coinbase employee last night and he was like "your robinhood tweet was all over our slack. we were freaking out you picked them over base" we picked robinhood because @vladtenev has aura vlad never said "robinhood is for squirting" robinhood has motion

not declaring writable state upfront (evm) should be illegal.

@sama CLARITY Act would be nice!

clarity is nice

@0zSchnack @windhustler many such cases

@windhustler A story as old as time

blood sweat and tears cybersecurity is very asymmetrical you either get paid very well and your efforts are respected or you get paid peanuts and get a slap on your face

@0zSchnack I'd be careful trusting Sol; having terra+luna in the bag has a pretty bad track record ngl

Considering switching from Claude to 5.6 Sol. Haven’t gotten any security guardrail-refusals from Sol so far 🤔

@bencirc @solana @buffalu__ Then why not open that backrun order flow to public competition? Any private arrangement that restricts competition ultimately comes at a cost for users.

I agree: MEV is dead on @solana. I read and reacted to @buffalu__ article over a month ago, but it gave me a lot to think about as the CEO of one of the largest MEV data applications. After going through the opinions of traders and companies over the past month, I realize that MEV is still very often associated with sandwiching, mostly because the topic is misunderstood. If we exclude all the malicious parts of MEV, what is the concrete idea behind this practice? The idea is to monetize transactions. Nothing more complex than that. Most of the time, the expected monetization from MEV comes from arbitrage between DEXs. This practice is profitable for the arbitrager, but it also makes the market healthier by bringing the quote you see on your frontend closer to the actual execution value, meaning the real amount of tokens you will receive. In arbitrage, we need to clearly distinguish between several practices: - Spam: on-chain computation, not the most efficient for the chain - Shreds: off-chain computation, moderately efficient - Orderflows: off-chain computation, extremely efficient But we have the same problem with the word "Orderflow". It is the most efficient and healthy approach for the market, but people assume orderflow is a bad practice because it is often associated with sandwiching. There are already companies in the market representing around 35% of generated revenues. I won't name them in this tweet, but looking at Circular's top 10 makes it very easy to understand (one of them does not use Jito because they are a direct competitor 👀). Today, 35% of revenues are generated through orderflows. Which means 65% of revenues are still generated through shreds or spam. My opinion: no clear leader has emerged, and there is no solution that everyone knows, for several reasons: - The use of the word "MEV" - The use of the word "orderflow" - The fact that these players want to stay in the dark, fearing a bad image and the loss of customers After considering all these factors, and coming back to the article, I decided that with Circular, we are going to build a layer. Death to the terms "MEV" and "Orderflow". If the only purpose is to monetize transactions in a healthy way, why not call it exactly what it is? A monetization layer. Healthy. Clean. Transparent. Without harmful behavior for the chain. At @Circular_fi, we want to create the first Solana transaction monetization layer, giving full traceability to flow providers while also making it accessible to everyone. Everyone should be able to monetize their transactions. Validators. Wallets. dApps. AI. Traders. If this monetization layer had existed in early 2025, we could have already redistributed over $1 billion to flow providers. But our goal is not only to receive transactions earlier than the rest of the network simply to get an arbitrage hedge. Our goal is to build technologies on top of this hedge that will benefit the entire ecosystem. The ultimate goal? To use our monetization layer as a prediction layer, allowing us to build the most powerful and trustable aggregator in the ecosystem, giving traders the ability to truly get the most optimal quote and execution possible. That is possible. We're going to do it. Accelerate.