isuckmost
9.6K posts

isuckmost retweetledi

@Emme0322 @ReviewsPossum U cant travel faster then light but u dont have to if u can manipulate the space where ur at and to the space u want to get to u can close that gap in an instant.
English

Nothing can travel faster than light because it's more accurately thought of as the speed of causality. If it could, then an event could happen before whatever caused it. That's time travel.
That said, nothing can travel through space faster than light, but space itself can expand and contract faster than light, which is exactly what happens in a black hole. This is the idea behind the theoretical Alcubierre warp drive. The spaceship is essentially stationary inside a "bubble" of "flat" spacetime while the spacetime in front of it is contracted and the spacetime behind it is expanded. The spaceship doesn't move faster than light. The space around it does.
The reason we can't build an Alcubierre drive despite the math working out is it requires a lot of negative energy. While the Casimir effect proves negative energy exists, to produce the amount needed requires exotic matter which doesn't exist, as far as we know.
In quantum mechanics, the term "locality" is used to refer to the distance at which any event can influence any other event in a given span of time, limited by the speed of light. In the normal world that we're used to, nothing can influence anything at a distance in less time than it takes light to travel that distance. But in quantum mechanics, there exist phenomena such as entanglement, where two particles with the same origin have the opposite quantum state, but this state is fundamentally undefined (not because we don't know what it is, but because reality itself hasn't "decided" it) for both until one of them interacts with something and its "wave function" is collapses. When this happens, state of its entangled partner also becomes defined, and this happens instantly, no matter the distance, in apparent violation of locality.
This would seem to imply that information is traveling between the two particles faster than light, but that's not really what's happening. Because particles have a wave function (wave-particle duality), their positions in space are fundamentally indefinite, and wherever they are in space is a matter of probability. When two particles are entangled, their wave functions overlap, so no matter how far apart they are, they're "touching" each other in some way. It might be easier to think of the two particles as both fully occupying all of the space between them, because they essentially are until their wave functions collapse and their positions become definite (this is called superposition).
Even though wave function collapse happens instantly, this cannot be used to transmit information faster than light because there's also fundamental randomness to it. You can't know what state either particle is in until after you observe one and thereby collapse the wave function of the whole system (to "observe" in this context means to interact with it since it's impossible to measure anything in a quantum system without influencing it in some way). There's no way to "tell" a particle to be in one state or another, and thereby tell the other what state to be in.


Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage
Are we 100% sure nothing can surpass light speed?
English

@JasonHornbuckle @SCHIZO_FREQ U like the coke because its sweet and carbonated but when u like a person u cant describe it like that so u say they have a nice personality which is BS. What u like is the sexy ass they have
English

@SCHIZO_FREQ That's like saying you are attracted to coke because it's sweet and carbonated, but you don't know why you like it
English

Important to remember that there's actually no mechanism by which being attracted to something tells you WHY you're attracted to it
When you're into someone, it's just a feeling of being into them. It does not come with metadata saying like, "she has a good hip to waist ratio" or "her smile is nice"
In theory, you should be able to analyze your history of selections and learn something from it, but in practice people are too delusional, self-interested and unobservant for this to occur
So what actually happens is:
- You ask someone why they prefer something
- They make up an answer that is completely unrelated to the actual reason for their choice, but tells a flattering story about themselves
That's how you get interactions lik
"What do you like about your 6'6 vampire billionaire husband?"
"His personality"
It's not even a lie - they just have literally never been given the answer to this question
Nothing about liking him gave them this knowledge, so they default to telling a story they think makes them sound good
English

@BoldfaceJames @VagrantVillain @RhockoHarrison Persona 4 got one updated release while p3 has 3 now. P4G is a complete experience while p3 has no definitive version. They still got it wrong with reload
English

@VagrantVillain @RhockoHarrison persona 3 and 4 are almost identical and they came out within like two years of each other
English

@ToxicZoomer @RnT45t1 Kevin would say. Buy a dog and die alone 🎺🎺🎺🎺🎺
English
isuckmost retweetledi

@MattBelloni Why is Netflix aspiring to become a traditional film studio when that model is clearly coming apart, partly because of Netflix itself?
English
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi

キングヘイロー
B85・W60・H85
ホッコータルマエ
B86・W56・H85
...🤔


Espy@EspokunCity
I know someone is lying about their three sizes here...
日本語
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi
isuckmost retweetledi

isuckmost retweetledi




























