varnaru

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Less than 3%, a generation that seems to be on the verge of extinction in the Arabian Peninsula, and you should know that the heritage is in the alives, not in the dead.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 It's even found in many Arab people in arabian peninsula, not just "Assyrian".

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 You are mentally retarded, how many times do I have to explain this to you? I know that specific lineages from different branches contribute to the emergence of cultures, but you have no evidence that a branch of T was present in the emergence of Semitic groups.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 You ignorant, there certain lineages were Absorbed and even some few haplogroups reproduced and spread early in East Asia were absorbed. But what i mentioned had certain lineages were original to semites and contributed to the development of the Semites, this is what important.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Stop it, you're either not good enough at English or you're slow to understand, just forget it and go away.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Liar. No there no one or 2 certain lineages, it could be more than 10 haplogroups or even more but of certain lineages, that contribute to form or develop the language/culture. It's false claims/pseudo science say only one haplogroup and lineage are true founders.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I think that's enough, more studies are needed, nothing can be certain, although some things are closer to reality.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Still there no development of the specific branches, however, but the remains of the proto Semites, were often on the T1a1a (T-L208).

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Most of them belonged to pre-Semitic groups and almost unknown societies, later they mixed with other groups.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I have examined and studied many T sub-branches, all of which, except for a few lines limited to the Assyrians and Phoenicians, had no other specific connection with the early Semites.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 At least tell me the sub-branch or sub-branches of T that played a role in the formation of Semitic culture.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Well, my problem is this: you're saying it yourself: the T lineage wasn't necessarily the founder of Semitic culture, but rather a generation that absorbed multiple cultures over the millennia. And you still haven't sent a source that says early Semitic culture was shaped by T.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 What do you think about me, Zahar? Do you think my ancestors were also the truly founders of Semitic culture?

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Yes,and the date of the origin of the Semites in general is controversial subject academically. in fact arabic culture and later language actually not originated in arabian peninsula, but some of it went there, And in constant contact and movement as traders between civilizations

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Is it possible for you to send me the source? A reliable source, maybe it helped improve my informations, everything I said was the Facts from completely accurate sources that my mind also accepted.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Most Statistics are not accurate and contain exaggerations and false informations,linked to certain sites without others.Still earliet semites were of T and certain E subclades, then come J1, J2 Contributed to from and develope semitic language and followed by other lineages

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I didn't say that exactly, I said that each heritage has different lineages, but not all of these lineages necessarily inherit that heritage, but were later absorbed by the truly creators of that heritage.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I know that. It's not limited to certain culture, place, people, they were semi nomadic farmers found in most of western Eurasia like G, J2, J1 and some subclades of E. You the one who want to say that there are certain haplogroups and lineages are only linked to certain groups.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 If they were in that region, it was before the emergence of Semitic culture, perhaps 10,000 years ago. For example, Arabic culture may have been derived at most 4,000 years ago. So someone who lived in the Arabian Peninsula 10,000 years ago is not necessarily the creator of it

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Lies it found in early Semites who are not limited to natufian area, as some hypothesis claim, and that haplogroup also found in Syria since early period, early semites also found in much of levant and caucasus mountains, Pontic some of amorite (in fact earliest semitic)tribes.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 R1b-v88 lineage entered the Middle East from the East and mixed and merged with some Semitic groups such as the Assyrians, and later migrated to central Africa and merged with the indigenous African cultures there They were not the founders of those cultures at all

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I understand this but you don't understand it well, I'm saying that every culture has a core lineage, yes there are many sub-branches and many lineages among the Arabs today but these are the effects of later assimilation.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 It is not unique to Semitic culture, and in ancient charts it did not play a prominent role among Semitic peoples except the Assyrians.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 You are not capable of understanding what I mean, anyway, the T lineage was a generation that originated in levant and Anatolia and later absorbed various cultures such as Hellenic, Semitic and Persian

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I'm tired of talking to you, you're not smart and aware enough, why do you insist on linking all human lineages to Semitic culture?

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 I diot. I said some of them C, which have origins in western Eurasia, and Q apeared between Iran and Central Asia, Some of its branches were introduced into early Semites more than 4,000, but it is clear that its entry is late, so it is considered rare among the Semites/arabs.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Send me your source, the I2 lineage was found among the ancient Armenians and the Kura-Axes, not the Semites.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 All the haplogroups I mentioned are found high in early semitic culture and later ancient semitic civilizations even I2, it's earlies clans have common interests and all had contribution to developing the language, customs, culture, society, and gene pool.

@FGC4422171354 @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 You mentioned many lineages, but in the case of the Semites, J1 and E m35 were the core of this identity, the other lineages were absorbed later.

@itotwap @BY8509 @Braddaxu @JassasTY8849 Not truly. Different haplogroups from some certain lineages of the haplogroups contributed to form each different people, not just few haplogroups especially during early advanced cultures, like the semites, not the isolated one, but may some clans population explosion.